Re: [netmod] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-netmod-syslog-model-15

Hi Clyde, Trimming down to just the active discussion points. > 12. S3, P8: I'm having trouble understanding the pseudocode. What >happens if S and/or F are not present? Can S or F ever not be >present? - looking at the tree diagram, it seems like they might >

Re: [netmod] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-netmod-syslog-model-15 references

Clyde What concerns me most is that AFAICT anything that is referenced in a YANG module is a Normative Reference in the RFC that defines it and you do not have those two I-D in the list of references. Since they have not been published, then they would appear as I-Ds in the references and the

Re: [netmod] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-netmod-syslog-model-15

Kent, Comments inline as [clyde]… On 8/14/17, 6:53 AM, "Kent Watsen" wrote: >5. S1 as a whole. I'm a bit unclear what this section is doing. It >seems to be a general summary of Syslog (RFC5424). Do we need this here? > > [clyde]

Re: [netmod] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-netmod-syslog-model-15

>5. S1 as a whole. I'm a bit unclear what this section is doing. It >seems to be a general summary of Syslog (RFC5424). Do we need this here? > > [clyde] Suggestions appreciated. I wanted to provide a high level overview > of the syslog process. I cleaned it up a little. Move

Re: [netmod] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-netmod-syslog-model-15

Kent, Thanks for your exhaustive review. I will be publishing the revised model momentarily. Comments inline as [clyde]. On 7/12/17, 2:55 PM, "netmod on behalf of Kent Watsen" wrote: As shepherd, yang doctor, and individual

Re: [netmod] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-netmod-syslog-model-15

atsen" <kwat...@juniper.net>; <netmod@ietf.org> Sent: Wednesday, August 09, 2017 5:53 PM Subject: Re: [netmod] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-netmod-syslog-model-15 > Tom, > > The agreement was that I should use “” until the two unapproved RFCs that the model depends

Re: [netmod] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-netmod-syslog-model-15

Today's activity on this thread necessitates another response as well: The WG LC is closed. Authors, please address any comments that have been received, and let the WG know how the issues have been addressed, and when a version is available that is ready to be submitted for publication.

Re: [netmod] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-netmod-syslog-model-15

Hi Clyde, In my drafts that depend on more than one work in progress, I typically assign each of them a value (e.g., , , ) and then have RFC Editor instructions mapping each to a specific value. Kent // contributor -- Tom, The agreement was that I should use “” until the two

Re: [netmod] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-netmod-syslog-model-15

Tom, The agreement was that I should use “” until the two unapproved RFCs that the model depends on are assigned numbers. RFC : Keystore Management RFC : Transport Layer Security (TLS) Client"; Imported are: import ietf-tls-client { prefix tlsc; } import

Re: [netmod] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-netmod-syslog-model-15

Clyde You use as a placeholder for three different RFC and two of these do not appear AFAICT in the list of References. This might be a challenge for the RFC Editor. Tom Petch - Original Message - From: "Clyde Wildes (cwildes)" Sent: Wednesday, July 19, 2017

Re: [netmod] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-netmod-syslog-model-15

n...@ietf.org> on behalf of Kent Watsen <kwat...@juniper.net> Sent: Saturday, 8 July 2017 6:34 a.m. To: netmod@ietf.org Subject: [netmod] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-netmod-syslog-model-15 This is a notice to start a three week NETMOD WG last call for the docu

Re: [netmod] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-netmod-syslog-model-15

Juergen and Alex, The choice of Posix 1003.2 regular expressions was because of multiple vendors who supported same and asked for model support: http://www.juniper.net/documentation/en_US/junos12.3/topics/reference/configuration-statement/syslog-edit-system.html

Re: [netmod] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-netmod-syslog-model-15

As shepherd, yang doctor, and individual contributor, following is my LC/YD review. 1. Because I know this draft will not be presented in Prague, I first checked to see if it was NMDA-compatible. The draft contains just one module, and it only contains config true nodes (no config false nodes).

[netmod] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-netmod-syslog-model-15

This is a notice to start a three week NETMOD WG last call for the document: A YANG Data Model for Syslog Configuration https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-netmod-syslog-model-15 Note: Three weeks is more than needed, especially given this draft has been through Last Call