> On Dec 16, 2015:3:55 AM, at 3:55 AM, Benoit Claise wrote:
>
> Dear all,
>>> On 15 Dec 2015, at 13:34, Nadeau Thomas wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> NETMOD:
>>>
>>> The Broadband Forum and the members of the design team who worked on the
>>> IETF
> On 16 Dec 2015, at 09:55, Benoit Claise wrote:
>
> Dear all,
>>> On 15 Dec 2015, at 13:34, Nadeau Thomas wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> NETMOD:
>>>
>>> The Broadband Forum and the members of the design team who worked on the
>>> IETF Entity module
Hi Tom,
Good question. I should have made it clear. Sorry.
"While I understand the concern of work prioritization, one of the
issues in NETMOD is that we need to grow the number of people involved
in participating/editing/reviewing, and I'm happy to see Dan and Jimmy
taking the lead here."
Dear all,
On 15 Dec 2015, at 13:34, Nadeau Thomas wrote:
NETMOD:
The Broadband Forum and the members of the design team who worked on the
IETF Entity module have asked that the working group considerthe ietf-entity
YANG module
(currently
> On 15 Dec 2015, at 13:34, Nadeau Thomas wrote:
>
>
> NETMOD:
>
> The Broadband Forum and the members of the design team who worked on the
> IETF Entity module have asked that the working group considerthe ietf-entity
> YANG module
> (currently
NETMOD:
The Broadband Forum and the members of the design team who worked on the
IETF Entity module have asked that the working group considerthe ietf-entity
YANG module
(currently https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-entitydt-netmod-entity/ which
is
still in individual draft