>> Could all the presenters please have a slide on their module's NMDA
>> compatibility status? Things to consider:
>>
>> - is the operational state of configured values important?
>> - is there is a need to support system generated entries?
>> - note: if yes to either, the module SHOULD
On Tue, Jul 11, 2017 at 09:48:30PM +, Kent Watsen wrote:
>
> Could all the presenters please have a slide on their module's NMDA
> compatibility status? Things to consider:
>
> - is the operational state of configured values important?
> - is there is a need to support system generated
Could all the presenters please have a slide on their module's NMDA
compatibility status? Things to consider:
- is the operational state of configured values important?
- is there is a need to support system generated entries?
- note: if yes to either, the module SHOULD be NMDA-compatible.
The draft agenda for the NETMOD sessions at IETF 99 has been posted:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/99/agenda/netmod/
Please let us know if any adjustments are needed.
Thanks,
NETMOD WG Chairs
___
netmod mailing list
netmod@ietf.org