Martin Bjorklund writes:
> Ladislav Lhotka wrote:
>> On Mon, 2017-12-04 at 18:22 +0100, Juergen Schoenwaelder wrote:
>> > On Mon, Dec 04, 2017 at 06:05:58PM +0100, Ladislav Lhotka wrote:
>> > > On Mon, 2017-12-04 at 17:34 +0100, Martin Bjorklund wrote:
>> > > >
On Tue, 2017-12-05 at 15:38 +0100, Martin Bjorklund wrote:
> Balazs Lengyel wrote:
> > On 2017-12-05 11:04, Robert Wilton wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > I see your point now.
> > The server has to evaluate the when-stmts in operational.
> >
> >
On 05/12/2017 14:38, Martin Bjorklund wrote:
Balazs Lengyel wrote:
On 2017-12-05 11:04, Robert Wilton wrote:
I see your point now.
The server has to evaluate the when-stmts in operational.
I think that this is probably down to
Balazs Lengyel wrote:
> On 2017-12-05 11:04, Robert Wilton wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> I see your point now.
> The server has to evaluate the when-stmts in operational.
>
> I think that this is probably down to implementation, but I don't
> think
On 2017-12-05 11:04, Robert Wilton
wrote:
I see your point now.
The server has to evaluate the when-stmts in
operational.
On Tue, 2017-12-05 at 11:25 +0100, Juergen Schoenwaelder wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 05, 2017 at 10:03:07AM +0100, Ladislav Lhotka wrote:
> > On Mon, 2017-12-04 at 21:00 +0100, Juergen Schoenwaelder wrote:
> > > On Mon, Dec 04, 2017 at 07:09:51PM +0100, Ladislav Lhotka wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Well,
On Tue, Dec 05, 2017 at 10:03:07AM +0100, Ladislav Lhotka wrote:
> On Mon, 2017-12-04 at 21:00 +0100, Juergen Schoenwaelder wrote:
> > On Mon, Dec 04, 2017 at 07:09:51PM +0100, Ladislav Lhotka wrote:
> > >
> > > Well, according to draft-ietf-netmod-revised-datastores-07:
> > >
> > >o
On 04/12/2017 17:47, Andy Bierman wrote:
On Mon, Dec 4, 2017 at 9:05 AM, Ladislav Lhotka > wrote:
On Mon, 2017-12-04 at 17:34 +0100, Martin Bjorklund wrote:
> Ladislav Lhotka > wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
On Mon, 2017-12-04 at 17:29 +, Robert Wilton wrote:
> Hi Lada,
>
>
> On 04/12/2017 17:05, Ladislav Lhotka wrote:
> > On Mon, 2017-12-04 at 17:34 +0100, Martin Bjorklund wrote:
> > > Ladislav Lhotka wrote:
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > if we have
> > > >
> > > > augment
On Mon, 2017-12-04 at 21:00 +0100, Juergen Schoenwaelder wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 04, 2017 at 07:09:51PM +0100, Ladislav Lhotka wrote:
> >
> > Well, according to draft-ietf-netmod-revised-datastores-07:
> >
> >o datastore schema: The combined set of schema nodes for all modules
> >
day, 5 December 2017 7:09 a.m.
To: Juergen Schoenwaelder
Cc: NETMOD WG
Subject: Re: [netmod] evaluation of "when" under NMDA
On Mon, 2017-12-04 at 18:22 +0100, Juergen Schoenwaelder wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 04, 2017 at 06:05:58PM +0100, Ladislav Lhotka wrote:
> > On Mon, 2017-12-04 at 17
Ladislav Lhotka wrote:
> On Mon, 2017-12-04 at 18:22 +0100, Juergen Schoenwaelder wrote:
> > On Mon, Dec 04, 2017 at 06:05:58PM +0100, Ladislav Lhotka wrote:
> > > On Mon, 2017-12-04 at 17:34 +0100, Martin Bjorklund wrote:
> > > > Ladislav Lhotka wrote:
> > > > >
On Mon, Dec 04, 2017 at 07:09:51PM +0100, Ladislav Lhotka wrote:
>
> Well, according to draft-ietf-netmod-revised-datastores-07:
>
>o datastore schema: The combined set of schema nodes for all modules
> supported by a particular datastore, taking into consideration any
>
On Mon, 2017-12-04 at 09:36 -0800, Andy Bierman wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, Dec 4, 2017 at 9:22 AM, Juergen Schoenwaelder university.de> wrote:
> > On Mon, Dec 04, 2017 at 06:05:58PM +0100, Ladislav Lhotka wrote:
> > > On Mon, 2017-12-04 at 17:34 +0100, Martin Bjorklund
On Mon, 2017-12-04 at 18:22 +0100, Juergen Schoenwaelder wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 04, 2017 at 06:05:58PM +0100, Ladislav Lhotka wrote:
> > On Mon, 2017-12-04 at 17:34 +0100, Martin Bjorklund wrote:
> > > Ladislav Lhotka wrote:
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > if we have
> > > >
> > > >
On Mon, Dec 4, 2017 at 9:05 AM, Ladislav Lhotka wrote:
> On Mon, 2017-12-04 at 17:34 +0100, Martin Bjorklund wrote:
> > Ladislav Lhotka wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > if we have
> > >
> > > augment "/target/node" {
> > > when "...";
> > > ...
> > > }
> > >
> > >
On Mon, Dec 4, 2017 at 9:22 AM, Juergen Schoenwaelder <
j.schoenwael...@jacobs-university.de> wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 04, 2017 at 06:05:58PM +0100, Ladislav Lhotka wrote:
> > On Mon, 2017-12-04 at 17:34 +0100, Martin Bjorklund wrote:
> > > Ladislav Lhotka wrote:
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
>
Hi Lada,
On 04/12/2017 17:05, Ladislav Lhotka wrote:
On Mon, 2017-12-04 at 17:34 +0100, Martin Bjorklund wrote:
Ladislav Lhotka wrote:
Hi,
if we have
augment "/target/node" {
when "...";
...
}
is the "when" expression supposed to be evaluated separately in each
On Mon, Dec 04, 2017 at 06:05:58PM +0100, Ladislav Lhotka wrote:
> On Mon, 2017-12-04 at 17:34 +0100, Martin Bjorklund wrote:
> > Ladislav Lhotka wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > if we have
> > >
> > > augment "/target/node" {
> > > when "...";
> > > ...
> > > }
> > >
> > > is
On Mon, 2017-12-04 at 17:34 +0100, Martin Bjorklund wrote:
> Ladislav Lhotka wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > if we have
> >
> > augment "/target/node" {
> > when "...";
> > ...
> > }
> >
> > is the "when" expression supposed to be evaluated separately in each
>
> datastore,
> > and
Ladislav Lhotka wrote:
> Hi,
>
> if we have
>
> augment "/target/node" {
> when "...";
> ...
> }
>
> is the "when" expression supposed to be evaluated separately in each
> datastore,
> and the augment applied only in those datastores where the result is true?
Yes.
> RFC
Hi,
if we have
augment "/target/node" {
when "...";
...
}
is the "when" expression supposed to be evaluated separately in each datastore,
and the augment applied only in those datastores where the result is true?
RFC 7950 says in sec. 7.21.5 that the context node for XPath evaluation is
22 matches
Mail list logo