On 08/26/2015 03:48 PM, Andy Bierman wrote:
On Wed, Aug 26, 2015 at 12:33 PM, Lou Berger lber...@labn.net
mailto:lber...@labn.net wrote:
Tom,
On 8/26/2015 9:34 AM, Nadeau Thomas wrote:
...
This is exactly what I want to get on the table.
So taking a
Tom,
On 8/26/2015 9:34 AM, Nadeau Thomas wrote:
...
This is exactly what I want to get on the table.
So taking a step back, perhaps there is a YANG language question at the
heart of this discussion. I think we're seeing cases where the same
data model is useful in multiple
On Wed, Aug 26, 2015 at 12:33 PM, Lou Berger lber...@labn.net wrote:
Tom,
On 8/26/2015 9:34 AM, Nadeau Thomas wrote:
...
This is exactly what I want to get on the table.
So taking a step back, perhaps there is a YANG language question at the
heart of this discussion. I think
Martin,
On 8/26/2015 6:41 AM, Martin Bjorklund wrote:
Lou Berger lber...@labn.net wrote:
Martin,
Sorry for the delayed response, was away for a bit. Not sure if any of
this is OBE as just starting to catch up on mail.
On 08/20/2015 03:58 AM, Martin Bjorklund wrote:
Lou Berger
On Wed, Aug 26, 2015 at 09:41:26AM +, Acee Lindem (acee) wrote:
On 8/26/15, 2:40 AM, Juergen Schoenwaelder
j.schoenwael...@jacobs-university.de wrote:
On Tue, Aug 25, 2015 at 10:53:55PM -0400, Lou Berger wrote:
Hopefully, a decision to change all existing models (including vendor
On 8/26/15, 2:40 AM, Juergen Schoenwaelder
j.schoenwael...@jacobs-university.de wrote:
On Tue, Aug 25, 2015 at 10:53:55PM -0400, Lou Berger wrote:
Hopefully, a decision to change all existing models (including vendor
models!) will be based on something more technical than the fact that
a
On Aug 26, 2015:5:51 AM, at 5:51 AM, Lou Berger lber...@labn.net wrote:
On August 26, 2015 2:42:26 AM Juergen Schoenwaelder
j.schoenwael...@jacobs-university.de wrote:
On Tue, Aug 25, 2015 at 10:53:55PM -0400, Lou Berger wrote:
Hopefully, a decision to change all existing models
On Aug 26, 2015:6:26 AM, at 6:26 AM, Martin Bjorklund m...@tail-f.com wrote:
Acee Lindem (acee) a...@cisco.com wrote:
On 8/26/15, 2:40 AM, Juergen Schoenwaelder
j.schoenwael...@jacobs-university.de wrote:
On Tue, Aug 25, 2015 at 10:53:55PM -0400, Lou Berger wrote:
Hopefully, a
Nadeau Thomas tnad...@lucidvision.com wrote:
[Speaking for myself]
Is the resistance to this proposal because of the actual changes to
structure, or is it a resistance to churn/change?
The former. IMO this is technically not a good proposal, as I have
tried to explain
On August 26, 2015 6:24:19 AM Juergen Schoenwaelder
j.schoenwael...@jacobs-university.de wrote:
On Wed, Aug 26, 2015 at 09:41:26AM +, Acee Lindem (acee) wrote:
On 8/26/15, 2:40 AM, Juergen Schoenwaelder
j.schoenwael...@jacobs-university.de wrote:
On Tue, Aug 25, 2015 at 10:53:55PM
On Aug 26, 2015:9:09 AM, at 9:09 AM, Acee Lindem (acee) a...@cisco.com
wrote:
On 8/26/15, 8:09 AM, Martin Bjorklund m...@tail-f.com wrote:
Nadeau Thomas tnad...@lucidvision.com wrote:
On Aug 26, 2015:6:26 AM, at 6:26 AM, Martin Bjorklund m...@tail-f.com
wrote:
Acee Lindem
On Wed, Aug 26, 2015 at 6:34 AM, Nadeau Thomas tnad...@lucidvision.com
wrote:
On Aug 26, 2015:9:09 AM, at 9:09 AM, Acee Lindem (acee) a...@cisco.com
wrote:
On 8/26/15, 8:09 AM, Martin Bjorklund m...@tail-f.com wrote:
Nadeau Thomas tnad...@lucidvision.com wrote:
On Aug 26,
On Aug 26, 2015:10:51 AM, at 10:51 AM, Kent Watsen kwat...@juniper.net
wrote:
Another approach is to not rely so heavily on one giant uber-tree
that MUST be correct on the first try and never change.
I agree that an uber tree stands to make things worse.
This seems to
On Aug 19, 2015:10:31 PM, at 10:31 PM, Lou Berger lber...@labn.net wrote:
On 08/19/2015 08:48 AM, Nadeau Thomas wrote:
On Aug 18, 2015:9:38 PM, at 9:38 PM, Lou Berger lber...@labn.net wrote:
[Adding authors and RTG WG.]
Hi Andy,
I'm not sure who you are looking to hear from as you
On 08/19/2015 08:48 AM, Nadeau Thomas wrote:
On Aug 18, 2015:9:38 PM, at 9:38 PM, Lou Berger lber...@labn.net wrote:
[Adding authors and RTG WG.]
Hi Andy,
I'm not sure who you are looking to hear from as you addressed this
mail to the netmod list. I'm happy to give my opinion as it
Hi,
Lou Berger lber...@labn.net wrote:
On 8/18/2015 8:01 PM, Andy Bierman wrote:
Q1) scope
sec 2:
The model organization can itself be thought of as a meta-model,
in that it describes the relationships between individual models. We
choose to represent it also as simple
[Adding authors and RTG WG.]
Hi Andy,
I'm not sure who you are looking to hear from as you addressed this
mail to the netmod list. I'm happy to give my opinion as it seems you
might have been aiming this at the draft authors. (but then again
perhaps not.)
On 8/18/2015 8:01 PM, Andy Bierman
17 matches
Mail list logo
