Re: [netmod] JSON encoding of anyxml

Martin Bjorklund writes: > Andy Bierman wrote: >> On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 6:16 AM, Robert Varga wrote: >> >> > Hello, >> > >> > I am not favor of it, either, but RFC6020 is here and is being widely >> > deployed. So is RESTCONF+JSON, which is

Re: [netmod] Modelling ports that can support multiple physical layer standards

Hi William, I'm not that familiar with Broadband physical layer standards, but I have an interest in figuring out some of the physical layer and interface layer relationships in YANG. There are a couple of things that are not clear to me from your email, so I have two questions: 1) Am I

Re: [netmod] JSON encoding of anyxml

Robert Varga writes: > On 11/05/2015 09:56 AM, Ladislav Lhotka wrote: >>> Given the resolution of Y34 in YANG 1.1, Martin's proposal to encode >>> >anyxml as a string that has XML inside makes sense. >> The possibility of sending arbitrary (non-YANG) data in the native encoding >>

[netmod] Modelling ports that can support multiple physical layer standards

All, We would much appreciate comments and suggestions on the question posed below. Thanks, William Lupton (Software Architect, Broadband Forum) In the Broadband Forum we need to model a port that can support several physical layer standards, but only one at a time. An

Re: [netmod] JSON encoding of anyxml

On Wed, Nov 11, 2015 at 11:54:58AM +0100, Ladislav Lhotka wrote: > > > On 11 Nov 2015, at 09:07, Juergen Schoenwaelder > > wrote: > > > > On Wed, Nov 11, 2015 at 07:34:23AM +0100, Martin Bjorklund wrote: > >> Andy Bierman wrote: > >>>

Re: [netmod] JSON encoding of anyxml

On Wed, Nov 11, 2015 at 08:31:14AM -0800, Andy Bierman wrote: > On Wed, Nov 11, 2015 at 7:32 AM, Juergen Schoenwaelder < > j.schoenwael...@jacobs-university.de> wrote: > > > On Wed, Nov 11, 2015 at 03:14:13PM +0100, Ladislav Lhotka wrote: > > > > > > > On 11 Nov 2015, at 14:59, Juergen

Re: [netmod] JSON encoding of anyxml

On Wed, Nov 11, 2015 at 03:14:13PM +0100, Ladislav Lhotka wrote: > > > On 11 Nov 2015, at 14:59, Juergen Schoenwaelder > > wrote: > > > > On Wed, Nov 11, 2015 at 02:53:49PM +0100, Ladislav Lhotka wrote: > >> > >>> On 11 Nov 2015, at 14:44, Juergen

Re: [netmod] JSON encoding of anyxml

On Wed, Nov 11, 2015 at 7:32 AM, Juergen Schoenwaelder < j.schoenwael...@jacobs-university.de> wrote: > On Wed, Nov 11, 2015 at 03:14:13PM +0100, Ladislav Lhotka wrote: > > > > > On 11 Nov 2015, at 14:59, Juergen Schoenwaelder < > j.schoenwael...@jacobs-university.de> wrote: > > > > > > On Wed,

Re: [netmod] Modelling ports that can support multiple physical layer standards

On Wed, Nov 11, 2015 at 09:28:57AM +, William Lupton wrote: > All, > > We would much appreciate comments and suggestions on the question posed below. > [...] Good question. Is this question comparable to IEEE 802.3 interfaces and Medium Attachment Units (MAUs)? In the past, I think we have

Re: [netmod] Modelling ports that can support multiple physical layer standards

Rob, Thanks! Please see inline. Cheers, William. > On 11 Nov 2015, at 10:49, Robert Wilton wrote: > > Hi William, > > I'm not that familiar with Broadband physical layer standards, but I have an > interest in figuring out some of the physical layer and interface layer >

Re: [netmod] JSON encoding of anyxml

On Wed, Nov 11, 2015 at 02:24:15PM +0100, Ladislav Lhotka wrote: > > > > > I wrote 'effectively deprecated' and here is the text in 6020bis. > > > > Since the use of anyxml limits the manipulation of the content, it is > > RECOMMENDED that the "anyxml" statement not be used to define > >

Re: [netmod] Modelling ports that can support multiple physical layer standards

Hi Juergen, On 11/11/2015 12:13, Juergen Schoenwaelder wrote: On Wed, Nov 11, 2015 at 09:28:57AM +, William Lupton wrote: All, We would much appreciate comments and suggestions on the question posed below. [...] Good question. Is this question comparable to IEEE 802.3 interfaces and

Re: [netmod] Modelling ports that can support multiple physical layer standards

Hi William, Please see inline ... On 11/11/2015 12:21, William Lupton wrote: Rob, Thanks! Please see inline. Cheers, William. On 11 Nov 2015, at 10:49, Robert Wilton > wrote: Hi William, I'm not that familiar with Broadband physical layer

Re: [netmod] JSON encoding of anyxml

> On 11 Nov 2015, at 13:26, Juergen Schoenwaelder > wrote: > > On Wed, Nov 11, 2015 at 11:54:58AM +0100, Ladislav Lhotka wrote: >> >>> On 11 Nov 2015, at 09:07, Juergen Schoenwaelder >>> wrote: >>> >>> On Wed, Nov

Re: [netmod] JSON encoding of anyxml

> On 11 Nov 2015, at 14:44, Juergen Schoenwaelder > wrote: > > On Wed, Nov 11, 2015 at 02:24:15PM +0100, Ladislav Lhotka wrote: >> >>> >>> I wrote 'effectively deprecated' and here is the text in 6020bis. >>> >>> Since the use of anyxml limits the

Re: [netmod] Modelling ports that can support multiple physical layer standards

Robert Wilton writes: > Hi William, > > I'm not that familiar with Broadband physical layer standards, but I > have an interest in figuring out some of the physical layer and > interface layer relationships in YANG. > > There are a couple of things that are not clear to me

Re: [netmod] JSON encoding of anyxml

Randy Presuhn writes: > Hi - > >>From: Juergen Schoenwaelder >>Sent: Nov 11, 2015 5:44 AM >>To: Ladislav Lhotka >>Cc: netmod@ietf.org >>Subject: Re: [netmod] JSON encoding of anyxml > ... >>Observations: >> >> -

Re: [netmod] JSON encoding of anyxml

Hi - >From: Juergen Schoenwaelder >Sent: Nov 11, 2015 5:44 AM >To: Ladislav Lhotka >Cc: netmod@ietf.org >Subject: Re: [netmod] JSON encoding of anyxml ... >Observations: > > - Except b), none of the options is interoperable. Option d) is >

Re: [netmod] JSON encoding of anyxml

On Wed, Nov 11, 2015 at 07:34:23AM +0100, Martin Bjorklund wrote: > Andy Bierman wrote: > > On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 6:16 AM, Robert Varga wrote: > > > > > Hello, > > > > > > I am not favor of it, either, but RFC6020 is here and is being widely > > > deployed. So