[netmod] 答复: Regarding IPR on draft-entitydt-netmod-entity

Hi, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft. Best regards, Jie 发件人: Kent Watsen [mailto:kwat...@juniper.net] 发送时间: 2016年3月17日 2:20 收件人: a...@yumaworks.com; m...@tail-f.com; Dongjie (Jimmy); droma...@avaya.com 抄送: netmod@ietf.org; netmod-cha...@ietf.org 主题: Regarding IPR on

[netmod] Stephen Farrell's No Objection on draft-ietf-netmod-yang-json-09: (with COMMENT)

Stephen Farrell has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-netmod-yang-json-09: No Objection When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer

[netmod] Fwd: Cutoff date for requesting remote presentations support

Please let us (netmod-cha...@ietf.org) if you plan to present remotely for the BA meeting. Thanks, Lou Forwarded Message Subject:Cutoff date for requesting remote presentations support Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2016 17:36:25 +0100 From: Meetecho IETF support

[netmod] Regarding IPR on draft-entitydt-netmod-entity

[This regards the new pre-adoption process described by http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/netmod/current/msg15520.html] Authors, Contributors, WG, As part of the preparation for WG Last Call, are you aware of any IPR that applies to draft identified above? Please state either: "No,

Re: [netmod] [Gen-art] Gen-Art LC review: draft-ietf-netmod-yang-metadata-04

Thanks, Robert and all. I have balloted no-objection for this draft on tonights’s IESG telechat. Jari signature.asc Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail ___ netmod mailing list netmod@ietf.org

Re: [netmod] Regarding IPR on draft-wilton-netmod-intf-vlan-yang

No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft. David On 16/03/2016 18:52, Kent Watsen wrote: [This regards the new pre-adoption process described by http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/netmod/current/msg15520.html] Authors, Contributors, WG, As part of the preparation for WG

Re: [netmod] draft-bjorklund-netmod-structural-mount / possible simplification

- Original Message - From: "Juergen Schoenwaelder" Sent: Friday, March 04, 2016 4:52 PM > On Fri, Mar 04, 2016 at 04:25:37PM +, STUART VENTERS wrote: > > > > 2) Allow the 'rpc' and 'notification' nouns to be used in other places in the

Re: [netmod] Regarding IPR on draft-wilton-netmod-intf-ext-yang

Hi all, I am not aware of any IPR. I fully support this draft as a co author. Thanks Tapraj On Mar 16, 2016, at 11:18 AM, Kent Watsen > wrote: [This regards the new pre-adoption process described by

[netmod] Regarding IPR on draft-bjorklund-netmod-structural-mount and draft-lhotka-netmod-ysdl

Authors, Contributors, WG, As part of the preparation for WG Adoption Are you aware of any IPR that applies to drafts identified above? [NOTE: Adoption poll will be on the first draft, but authors have agreed that -01 WG revision will be based on both.] Please state either: "No, I'm not

[netmod] Regarding IPR on draft-wilton-netmod-intf-vlan-yang

[This regards the new pre-adoption process described by http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/netmod/current/msg15520.html] Authors, Contributors, WG, As part of the preparation for WG Last Call, are you aware of any IPR that applies to draft identified above? Please state either: "No,

[netmod] Fwd: Blog: YANG Data Models in the Industry: Current State of Affairs

Forwarded here, in case you don't look at the IETF-Discussion list Regards, B. Forwarded Message Subject:Blog: YANG Data Models in the Industry: Current State of Affairs Date: Thu, 17 Mar 2016 07:49:32 -0700 From: Benoit Claise To:

Re: [netmod] Differentiating the types of Mount

I have placed the Mount definitions from the email discussion into: draft-voit-netmod-yang-mount-requirements-00 This -00 draft isn't really that new. It is just our recent email exchanges incorporated into the last version of: draft-voit-netmod-peer-mount-requirements-03 But I renamed the -03

Re: [netmod] deviation that changes config true to false: deviate add or replace?

"Larsson, Gustav" wrote: > (Originally posted to the netconf mailing list in error. My > apologies.) > > Hello, > > When a node defaults to config true and a deviation changes it to > config false, should "deviate add" or "deviate replace" be used? Some > YANG

Re: [netmod] deviation that changes config true to false: deviate add or replace?

Martin Bjorklund je 17.3.2016 ob 21:32 napisal: "Larsson, Gustav" wrote: (Originally posted to the netconf mailing list in error. My apologies.) Hello, When a node defaults to config true and a deviation changes it to config false, should "deviate add" or "deviate

Re: [netmod] Differentiating the types of Mount

Eric, I did the suggested OpenDaylight (ODL)search, and yes there is a lot of activity there. There are a lot of trees in that forest. The best overview I found seems to be here. https://wiki.opendaylight.org/view/OpenDaylight_Controller:_SAL_Architecture_Overview#Nested_Subsystems Mapping

Re: [netmod] Differentiating the types of Mount

> From: STUART VENTERS, March 16, 2016 12:58 PM > > Defining a schema-tree seems Yang's strong suite. > I'm not sure if the suite extends to defining what goes into a data-tree > governed > by the schema-tree. Hi Stuart, Open Daylight has found Mounting YANG data from one device to another has

Re: [netmod] draft-bjorklund-netmod-structural-mount / possible simplification

Juergen, Agreed, given where you are in the process, the Yang1.1/action ship has sailed. At this point, if the feedback is valid (consensus for which hasn't been shown), it only provides an Occam's Razor reminder for thinking about how to add future features. If the mount ship has not

Re: [netmod] Regarding IPR on draft-wilton-netmod-intf-ext-yang

Hi, No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft. Thanks, Selvakumar From: Kent Watsen > Date: Wednesday, March 16, 2016 at 11:18 AM To: "rwil...@cisco.com" >,

Re: [netmod] Differentiating the types of Mount

Thank you Eric and Juergen, this is really helpful, especially the diagram. Is there an implementation distinction between alias-mount and peer-mount? I’m hoping that there is one solution for both. Is there a difference with edits? E.g., a remote data mount is read-only, whereas a local

Re: [netmod] draft-bjorklund-netmod-structural-mount / possible simplification

On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 12:26:17PM +, t. petch wrote: > - Original Message - > From: "Juergen Schoenwaelder" > Sent: Friday, March 04, 2016 4:52 PM > > > > On Fri, Mar 04, 2016 at 04:25:37PM +, STUART VENTERS wrote: > > > > > > 2) Allow

[netmod] Fwd: I-D Action: draft-ietf-netmod-acl-model-07.txt

The ver 07 has incorporated comments from the WG LC and it has been moved to YANG 1.1 Dean > Begin forwarded message: > > From: internet-dra...@ietf.org > Subject: [netmod] I-D Action: draft-ietf-netmod-acl-model-07.txt > Date: March 11, 2016 at 12:59:30 PM EST > To: >

Re: [netmod] draft-bjorklund-netmod-structural-mount / possible simplification

Speaking with my WG chair hat on, I think it is a bit late to discuss the design of actions. The WG has been working on YANG 1.1 for almost two years and unless something is really broken in the specification I am not going to take the specification back from where it is now, namely the processing

Re: [netmod] Regarding IPR on draft-wilton-netmod-intf-vlan-yang

"No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft" Thanks, Selvakumar From: Kent Watsen > Date: Wednesday, March 16, 2016 at 11:52 AM To: "rwil...@cisco.com" >,

Re: [netmod] Differentiating the types of Mount

Hi, I have one addition on top of Eric's response --- Alex > > Is your alias mount simply a special case of a peer mount where the > peer is local? Or is there more to it? >From a syntax standpoint, peer mount is more general. But underneath, things >get more complicated. For example,

[netmod] deviation that changes config true to false: deviate add or replace?

(Originally posted to the netconf mailing list in error. My apologies.) Hello, When a node defaults to config true and a deviation changes it to config false, should "deviate add" or "deviate replace" be used? Some YANG implementations allow either, some allow only "deviate replace". Perhaps

Re: [netmod] draft-bjorklund-netmod-structural-mount / possible simplification

Interesting, this highlights a concern I have with Yang. It's highlevel goals and progress are great, but at a detail level, instead of using one general purpose language construct per feature, it seems to be evolving to use many. For a new language evolving in an old problem area, this

Re: [netmod] Regarding IPR on draft-entitydt-netmod-entity

I am not aware of any IPR related to this draft. [BTW, you should change the text from "preparation for WG Last Call" to "preparation for WG adoption" or something.] /martin Kent Watsen wrote: > [This regards the new pre-adoption process described by >

Re: [netmod] Regarding IPR on draft-entitydt-netmod-entity

Hi, No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft Andy On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 11:19 AM, Kent Watsen wrote: > [This regards the new pre-adoption process described by > http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/netmod/current/msg15520.html] > > > Authors,