Re: [netmod] YANG library update and new YANG guideline issue

> On 09 Jun 2016, at 13:57, Juergen Schoenwaelder > wrote: > > On Thu, Jun 09, 2016 at 01:08:36PM +0200, Ladislav Lhotka wrote: >> >>> On 09 Jun 2016, at 02:25, Andy Bierman wrote: >>> >>> Hi, >>> >>> >>> We have been asked to

Re: [netmod] leafref value space and constraint

> On 08 Jun 2016, at 17:22, Dale R. Worley wrote: > > Martin Bjorklund writes: >> The text for "path" already says: >> >> It takes as an argument a >> string that MUST refer to a leaf or leaf-list node. > > Given what the text must mean, that's

[netmod] Canonical order: linkage and meta

All, RFC 6020bis says “The ABNF grammar [RFC5234] [RFC7405] defines the canonical order. To improve module readability, it is RECOMMENDED that clauses be entered in this order.” The ABNF places linkage-stmts (import, include) before meta-stmts (organization, contact, description, reference)

Re: [netmod] YANG library update and new YANG guideline issue

Ladislav Lhotka wrote: > > > On 09 Jun 2016, at 02:25, Andy Bierman wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > > > We have been asked to make the YANG library module consistent > > wrt/ use of a container parent for a list. We decided to remove the > > submodules

Re: [netmod] YANG library update and new YANG guideline issue

> On 09 Jun 2016, at 02:25, Andy Bierman wrote: > > Hi, > > > We have been asked to make the YANG library module consistent > wrt/ use of a container parent for a list. We decided to remove the > submodules container parent from the child submodule. > The submodule list

Re: [netmod] YANG library update and new YANG guideline issue

On Thu, Jun 09, 2016 at 01:08:36PM +0200, Ladislav Lhotka wrote: > > > On 09 Jun 2016, at 02:25, Andy Bierman wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > > > We have been asked to make the YANG library module consistent > > wrt/ use of a container parent for a list. We decided to remove

Re: [netmod] YANG library update and new YANG guideline issue

Ladislav Lhotka wrote: > > > On 09 Jun 2016, at 13:57, Juergen Schoenwaelder > > wrote: > > > > On Thu, Jun 09, 2016 at 01:08:36PM +0200, Ladislav Lhotka wrote: > >> > >>> On 09 Jun 2016, at 02:25, Andy Bierman wrote:

Re: [netmod] YANG library update and new YANG guideline issue

> On 09 Jun 2016, at 14:18, Martin Bjorklund wrote: > > Ladislav Lhotka wrote: >> >>> On 09 Jun 2016, at 13:57, Juergen Schoenwaelder >>> wrote: >>> >>> On Thu, Jun 09, 2016 at 01:08:36PM +0200, Ladislav Lhotka wrote:

Re: [netmod] Replacing a YANG submodule with a module

wor...@ariadne.com (Dale R. Worley) wrote: > William Lupton writes: > > Consider the YANG module, submodule and tree files shown > > below. Suppose that I regret the decision to make "submod" be a > > submodule and want to replace it with a module (see listings

Re: [netmod] Replacing a YANG submodule with a module

Martin, I think that the answer is “yes” but please could you just confirm that the alternatives presented here are valid? In the real world I think I would usually follow the second approach of retaining the submodule (including its groupings) but simply breaking out the definitions of the

Re: [netmod] Opstate solutions discussions: update and request for WG input

I'm also in favor of B. I personally do not like the way state/config are expressed in [1] as it complexifies the way yang modules are written while a solution like [4] allows to have a more cleaner yang module while achieving the same goal. As expressed by others, B will also be faster with

Re: [netmod] Remove input-interface (metadata) from netmod-acl-model-07 ?

Dean/Acee, Is this a relevant example of ACL being configured on an interface? http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/routers/asr9000/software/asr9k_r4-2/addr_serv/configuration/guide/b_ipaddr_cg42a9k/b_ipaddr_cg42a9k_chapter_01.html#task_1049371 Talking to implementers, the feature is very much

[netmod] Fwd: YANG Model Coordination Group directory closure

FYI. Forwarded Message Subject:YANG Model Coordination Group directory closure Date: Thu, 9 Jun 2016 17:35:07 +0200 From: Benoit Claise To: IETF-Discussion list , yang-co...@ietf.org Dear all, The YANG

Re: [netmod] Remove input-interface (metadata) from netmod-acl-model-07 ?

Hi Mahesh, From: Mahesh Jethanandani Date: Thursday, June 9, 2016 at 10:35 AM To: Dean Bogdanovic Cc: Acee Lindem , netmod WG Subject: Re: [netmod] Remove input-interface (metadata) from netmod-acl-model-07 ?

Re: [netmod] [Gen-art] Gen-ART IETF Last Call review of draft-ietf-netmod-rfc6020bis-12 (part 1)

Martin Bjorklund writes: > Do you have an suggestion for what to write? These kinds of > multi-line strings are almost always 'description' statements, > used for human consumption. It is not clear to me what the warning > would be. >> So you can't write an isolated CR in most

Re: [netmod] update on "rdns" URN for enterprise YANG models

> -Original Message- > From: Alex Campbell [mailto:alex.campb...@aviatnet.com] > Sent: Thursday, May 26, 2016 8:54 PM > To: Ing-Wher (Helen) Chen > Cc: netmod@ietf.org > Subject: Re: [netmod] update on "rdns" URN for enterprise YANG models > > > > From: netmod

Re: [netmod] [Gen-art] Gen-ART IETF Last Call review of draft-ietf-netmod-rfc6020bis-12 (part 1)

wor...@ariadne.com (Dale R. Worley) wrote: > Martin Bjorklund writes: > > Do you have an suggestion for what to write? These kinds of > > multi-line strings are almost always 'description' statements, > > used for human consumption. It is not clear to me what the warning > >

Re: [netmod] YANG library update and new YANG guideline issue

My preference is not to add schema nodes that are not useful. If it is foreseen that other nodes will be added in the container then the container is fine; otherwise I see no reason to have one. From: netmod on behalf of Andy Bierman

Re: [netmod] Replacing a YANG submodule with a module

Martin Bjorklund writes: >> If I understand Yang correctly, that error can't be fixed by revising >> the new module test to clone mod:util as test:util, because though the >> new grouping is semantically identical to the old grouping, it's still a >> change in its definition: > >

Re: [netmod] Remove input-interface (metadata) from netmod-acl-model-07 ?

> On Jun 9, 2016, at 7:58 AM, Acee Lindem (acee) wrote: >> >> Is this a relevant example of ACL being configured on an interface? >> >> http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/routers/asr9000/software/asr9k_r4-2/a >>

[netmod] Tokenizing and strings (was: Gen-ART IETF Last Call review of draft-ietf-netmod-rfc6020bis-12 (part 2))

At this point, I think there are some aspects of the use of strings and identifiers that aren't completely specified, but I'd have to check the current text to know for certain. However, that's a minor matter. The issue that concerns me is that the ABNF doesn't specify what is allowed as a

Re: [netmod] Remove input-interface (metadata) from netmod-acl-model-07 ?

It is shown in the draft as an example of how to augment the interface module. Just to be clear -> the link you sent to the Cisco doc does not show the use of 'metadata' or an input-interface match criteria. Jason -Original Message- From: netmod [mailto:netmod-boun...@ietf.org] On