Re: [netmod] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-netmod-syslog-model-11

2017-01-11 Thread Martin Bjorklund
Hi, "Clyde Wildes (cwildes)" wrote: > Any > > My comments inline as [clyde2]… > > From: Andy Bierman > Date: Saturday, December 31, 2016 at 8:24 AM > To: "Clyde Wildes (cwildes)" > Cc: Alex Campbell ,

Re: [netmod] [Netconf] Decision on the Intended Status of the Revised DS Draft WAS:RE: :candidate, :writable-running and RESTCONF edits

2017-01-11 Thread Martin Bjorklund
Ladislav Lhotka wrote: > > > On 11 Jan 2017, at 13:53, Martin Bjorklund wrote: > > > > Ladislav Lhotka wrote: > >> > >>> On 11 Jan 2017, at 13:27, Martin Bjorklund wrote: > >>> > >>> Ladislav Lhotka wrote: >

Re: [netmod] [Netconf] Decision on the Intended Status of the Revised DS Draft WAS:RE: :candidate, :writable-running and RESTCONF edits

2017-01-11 Thread Robert Wilton
On 11/01/2017 09:22, Martin Bjorklund wrote: Andy Bierman wrote: On Tue, Jan 10, 2017 at 1:20 PM, Kent Watsen wrote: I think it is better to have a human decide what is in the module instead of relying on a pyang plugin to generate some additional

Re: [netmod] [Netconf] Decision on the Intended Status of the Revised DS Draft WAS:RE: :candidate, :writable-running and RESTCONF edits

2017-01-11 Thread Ladislav Lhotka
> On 11 Jan 2017, at 15:18, Robert Wilton wrote: > > Hi, > > On 11/01/2017 13:05, Ladislav Lhotka wrote: >>> On 11 Jan 2017, at 13:53, Martin Bjorklund wrote: >>> >>> Ladislav Lhotka wrote: > Show me a single YANG data node definition

Re: [netmod] [Netconf] Decision on the Intended Status of the Revised DS Draft WAS:RE: :candidate, :writable-running and RESTCONF edits

2017-01-11 Thread Martin Bjorklund
Martin Bjorklund wrote: > Ladislav Lhotka wrote: > > > > > On 11 Jan 2017, at 13:53, Martin Bjorklund wrote: > > > > > > Ladislav Lhotka wrote: > > >> > > >>> On 11 Jan 2017, at 13:27, Martin Bjorklund wrote:

Re: [netmod] [Netconf] Decision on the Intended Status of the Revised DS Draft WAS:RE: :candidate, :writable-running and RESTCONF edits

2017-01-11 Thread Andy Bierman
On Wed, Jan 11, 2017 at 1:27 AM, Martin Bjorklund wrote: > Andy Bierman wrote: > > On Tue, Jan 10, 2017 at 4:53 PM, Kent Watsen > wrote: > > > > > Hi Andy, > > > > > > > > > > > > > Until the basic show-stoppers are solved, the

Re: [netmod] [Netconf] Decision on the Intended Status of the Revised DS Draft WAS:RE: :candidate, :writable-running and RESTCONF edits

2017-01-11 Thread Robert Wilton
Hi, On 11/01/2017 13:05, Ladislav Lhotka wrote: On 11 Jan 2017, at 13:53, Martin Bjorklund wrote: Ladislav Lhotka wrote: Show me a single YANG data node definition that's duplicate in my concept above. But then maybe I didn't explain it properly. The

Re: [netmod] [Netconf] Decision on the Intended Status of the Revised DS Draft WAS:RE: :candidate, :writable-running and RESTCONF edits

2017-01-11 Thread Ladislav Lhotka
> On 11 Jan 2017, at 15:37, Martin Bjorklund wrote: > > Ladislav Lhotka wrote: >> >>> On 11 Jan 2017, at 13:53, Martin Bjorklund wrote: >>> >>> Ladislav Lhotka wrote: > On 11 Jan 2017, at 13:27, Martin Bjorklund

Re: [netmod] [Netconf] Decision on the Intended Status of the Revised DS Draft WAS:RE: :candidate, :writable-running and RESTCONF edits

2017-01-11 Thread Robert Wilton
On 11/01/2017 14:48, Ladislav Lhotka wrote: On 11 Jan 2017, at 15:18, Robert Wilton wrote: Hi, On 11/01/2017 13:05, Ladislav Lhotka wrote: On 11 Jan 2017, at 13:53, Martin Bjorklund wrote: Ladislav Lhotka wrote: Show me a single YANG

Re: [netmod] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-netmod-syslog-model-11

2017-01-11 Thread Clyde Wildes (cwildes)
Kent, I will respond to Andy’s comments this morning and publish a new draft ASAP. It would be very helpful if Andy and Alex could work with me on the new draft. Thanks, Clyde On 1/10/17, 11:34 AM, "Kent Watsen" wrote: Hi Clyde, The LC period has ended.

Re: [netmod] [Netconf] Decision on the Intended Status of the Revised DS Draft WAS:RE: :candidate, :writable-running and RESTCONF edits

2017-01-11 Thread Ladislav Lhotka
> On 11 Jan 2017, at 17:56, Andy Bierman wrote: > > Hi, > > > On Wed, Jan 11, 2017 at 7:12 AM, Robert Wilton wrote: > > > On 11/01/2017 09:22, Martin Bjorklund wrote: > Andy Bierman wrote: > On Tue, Jan 10, 2017 at 1:20 PM, Kent

Re: [netmod] [Netconf] Decision on the Intended Status of the Revised DS Draft WAS:RE: :candidate, :writable-running and RESTCONF edits

2017-01-11 Thread Ladislav Lhotka
> On 11 Jan 2017, at 12:16, Martin Bjorklund wrote: > > Ladislav Lhotka wrote: >> >>> On 11 Jan 2017, at 10:36, Martin Bjorklund wrote: >>> >>> Ladislav Lhotka wrote: > On 10 Jan 2017, at 09:39, Juergen Schoenwaelder

Re: [netmod] [Netconf] Decision on the Intended Status of the Revised DS Draft WAS:RE: :candidate, :writable-running and RESTCONF edits

2017-01-11 Thread Martin Bjorklund
Ladislav Lhotka wrote: > > > On 10 Jan 2017, at 09:39, Juergen Schoenwaelder > > wrote: > > > > On Tue, Jan 10, 2017 at 09:20:36AM +0100, Ladislav Lhotka wrote: > >> > >> I think we need protocol and YANG specs that are not tied to any > >>

Re: [netmod] [Netconf] Decision on the Intended Status of the Revised DS Draft WAS:RE: :candidate, :writable-running and RESTCONF edits

2017-01-11 Thread Martin Bjorklund
Andy Bierman wrote: > On Tue, Jan 10, 2017 at 1:20 PM, Kent Watsen wrote: > > > > > > I think it is better to have a human decide what is in the module > > > instead of relying on a pyang plugin to generate some additional module > > > that follows some

Re: [netmod] [Netconf] Decision on the Intended Status of the Revised DS Draft WAS:RE: :candidate, :writable-running and RESTCONF edits

2017-01-11 Thread Martin Bjorklund
Andy Bierman wrote: > On Tue, Jan 10, 2017 at 4:53 PM, Kent Watsen wrote: > > > Hi Andy, > > > > > > > > > Until the basic show-stoppers are solved, the redundant opstate objects > > are not important. > > > > > Removing the foo-state objects means they

Re: [netmod] [Netconf] Decision on the Intended Status of the Revised DS Draft WAS:RE: :candidate, :writable-running and RESTCONF edits

2017-01-11 Thread Ladislav Lhotka
> On 11 Jan 2017, at 13:27, Martin Bjorklund wrote: > > Ladislav Lhotka wrote: >> >>> On 11 Jan 2017, at 12:16, Martin Bjorklund wrote: >>> >>> Ladislav Lhotka wrote: > On 11 Jan 2017, at 10:36, Martin Bjorklund

Re: [netmod] [Netconf] Decision on the Intended Status of the Revised DS Draft WAS:RE: :candidate, :writable-running and RESTCONF edits

2017-01-11 Thread Martin Bjorklund
Ladislav Lhotka wrote: > > > On 11 Jan 2017, at 13:27, Martin Bjorklund wrote: > > > > Ladislav Lhotka wrote: > >> > >>> On 11 Jan 2017, at 12:16, Martin Bjorklund wrote: > >>> > >>> Ladislav Lhotka wrote: >

Re: [netmod] [Netconf] Decision on the Intended Status of the Revised DS Draft WAS:RE: :candidate, :writable-running and RESTCONF edits

2017-01-11 Thread Martin Bjorklund
Ladislav Lhotka wrote: > > > On 11 Jan 2017, at 12:16, Martin Bjorklund wrote: > > > > Ladislav Lhotka wrote: > >> > >>> On 11 Jan 2017, at 10:36, Martin Bjorklund wrote: > >>> > >>> Ladislav Lhotka wrote: >

Re: [netmod] [Netconf] Decision on the Intended Status of the Revised DS Draft WAS:RE: :candidate, :writable-running and RESTCONF edits

2017-01-11 Thread Ladislav Lhotka
> On 11 Jan 2017, at 13:53, Martin Bjorklund wrote: > > Ladislav Lhotka wrote: >> >>> On 11 Jan 2017, at 13:27, Martin Bjorklund wrote: >>> >>> Ladislav Lhotka wrote: > On 11 Jan 2017, at 12:16, Martin Bjorklund

Re: [netmod] [Netconf] Decision on the Intended Status of the Revised DS Draft WAS:RE: :candidate, :writable-running and RESTCONF edits

2017-01-11 Thread Ladislav Lhotka
> On 11 Jan 2017, at 10:36, Martin Bjorklund wrote: > > Ladislav Lhotka wrote: >> >>> On 10 Jan 2017, at 09:39, Juergen Schoenwaelder >>> wrote: >>> >>> On Tue, Jan 10, 2017 at 09:20:36AM +0100, Ladislav Lhotka wrote:

Re: [netmod] [Netconf] Decision on the Intended Status of the Revised DS Draft WAS:RE: :candidate, :writable-running and RESTCONF edits

2017-01-11 Thread Martin Bjorklund
Ladislav Lhotka wrote: > > > On 11 Jan 2017, at 10:36, Martin Bjorklund wrote: > > > > Ladislav Lhotka wrote: > >> > >>> On 10 Jan 2017, at 09:39, Juergen Schoenwaelder > >>> wrote: > >>> > >>> On Tue, Jan

Re: [netmod] [Netconf] Decision on the Intended Status of the Revised DS Draft WAS:RE: :candidate, :writable-running and RESTCONF edits

2017-01-11 Thread Andy Bierman
On Wed, Jan 11, 2017 at 9:21 AM, Ladislav Lhotka wrote: > > > On 11 Jan 2017, at 17:56, Andy Bierman wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > > > On Wed, Jan 11, 2017 at 7:12 AM, Robert Wilton > wrote: > > > > > > On 11/01/2017 09:22, Martin Bjorklund

Re: [netmod] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-netmod-syslog-model-11

2017-01-11 Thread Clyde Wildes (cwildes)
Any My comments inline as [clyde2]… From: Andy Bierman Date: Saturday, December 31, 2016 at 8:24 AM To: "Clyde Wildes (cwildes)" Cc: Alex Campbell , "netmod@ietf.org" Subject: Re: [netmod] WG Last Call for

Re: [netmod] [Netconf] Decision on the Intended Status of the Revised DS Draft WAS:RE: :candidate, :writable-running and RESTCONF edits

2017-01-11 Thread Andy Bierman
Hi, On Wed, Jan 11, 2017 at 7:12 AM, Robert Wilton wrote: > > > On 11/01/2017 09:22, Martin Bjorklund wrote: > >> Andy Bierman wrote: >> >>> On Tue, Jan 10, 2017 at 1:20 PM, Kent Watsen >>> wrote: >>> >>> I think it is better to