On 29 Jul 2015, at 17:02, Juergen Schoenwaelder
j.schoenwael...@jacobs-university.de wrote:
On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 04:55:03PM +0200, Ladislav Lhotka wrote:
On 29 Jul 2015, at 16:44, Juergen Schoenwaelder
j.schoenwael...@jacobs-university.de wrote:
On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 04:38:41PM
There are some interesting ideas proposed. Here are some initial questions and
somewhat random comments based on a quick read of
draft-mansfield-netmod-uml-to-yang-00.
General questions on draft-mansfield-netmod-uml-to-yang:
1. Is the proposed mapping supposed to be bi-directional in
Andy Bierman a...@yumaworks.com wrote:
Hi,
I understand the intent is that an implementation of NACM
has to understand these NACM extensions. I agree with Lada
that the YANG text about MAY ignore extensions casts doubt whether
this sort of NACM rule is enforceable or specified correctly.
Hi,
I understand the intent is that an implementation of NACM
has to understand these NACM extensions. I agree with Lada
that the YANG text about MAY ignore extensions casts doubt whether
this sort of NACM rule is enforceable or specified correctly.
Andy
On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 10:44 AM,
Andy Bierman a...@yumaworks.com writes:
Hi,
I do not agree that ephemeral data should be outside the scope of the
standard.
I do not agree that YANG extensions should be used for IETF standards track
modules.
It was a mistake to define the get-filter hack in the first place.
IMO it is a
Juergen Schoenwaelder j.schoenwael...@jacobs-university.de writes:
Lada,
there won't be any decision as long as there is not a concrete
actionable proposal to be discussed. Such a proposal does not have to
be 'complete rewrite' but it needs to be a detailed list of what would
have to change
On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 09:34:17AM +0200, Martin Bjorklund wrote:
Hi,
Andy Bierman a...@yumaworks.com wrote:
I do not agree that YANG extensions should be used for IETF standards track
modules.
I strongly disagree. This was one of the two original ideas behind
extension statements
Dear all,
Agree with Lada and Juergen, regarding quantifying the changes and the time
frame.
Thank you,
Tina
On Jul 29, 2015, at 6:35 PM, Juergen Schoenwaelder
j.schoenwael...@jacobs-university.demailto:j.schoenwael...@jacobs-university.de
wrote:
On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 11:49:01AM +0200,
On 29 Jul 2015, at 12:25, Juergen Schoenwaelder
j.schoenwael...@jacobs-university.de wrote:
On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 09:34:17AM +0200, Martin Bjorklund wrote:
Hi,
Andy Bierman a...@yumaworks.com wrote:
I do not agree that YANG extensions should be used for IETF standards track
