Re: [netmod] YANG 1.1 ABNF for deviate-stmt

Andy Bierman wrote: > On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 1:45 AM, Martin Bjorklund wrote: > > > Hi Andy, > > > > Are you ok with the proposed OLD/NEW changes? > > > > > Yes, except the issue of multiple deviations (that could be in 1 module on > N modules). > The

Re: [netmod] YANG 1.1 ABNF for deviate-stmt

On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 1:45 AM, Martin Bjorklund wrote: > Hi Andy, > > Are you ok with the proposed OLD/NEW changes? > > Yes, except the issue of multiple deviations (that could be in 1 module on N modules). The actual result depends on the order the deviations are applied.

Re: [netmod] AD review draft-ietf-netmod-rfc6020bis-11 (part 1)

On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 12:24:09PM +0200, Martin Bjorklund wrote: > Hi Benoit, > > Benoit Claise wrote: > > Dear all, > > > > Here is part 1 of my AD review. > > > > I found this useful: > >

Re: [netmod] input Interface match

Any other opinions on this issue? There were quite a few hands in the air during the WG meeting Dean > On Apr 8, 2016, at 8:25 AM, Sterne, Jason (Nokia - CA) > wrote: > > Hi Dean, > > We should remove the metadata grouping from the base model. It is out of > place

Re: [netmod] AD review draft-ietf-netmod-rfc6020bis-11 (part 1)

Hi Benoit, Benoit Claise wrote: > Dear all, > > Here is part 1 of my AD review. > > I found this useful: > http://tools.ietf.org/rfcdiff/rfcdiff.pyht?url1=http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc6020.txt=http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-netmod-rfc6020bis-11.txt > > - Do we want to

Re: [netmod] YANG 1.1 ABNF for deviate-stmt

Hi Andy, Are you ok with the proposed OLD/NEW changes? /martin Martin Bjorklund wrote: > Andy Bierman wrote: > > Hi, > > > > The ABNF for "default" is wrong in the deviate-*-stmt (add, replace, delete) > > Is says [default-stmt] but it should be

Re: [netmod] yang model classification

Yali, > On Apr 21, 2016, at 6:03 AM, zhangyali (D) wrote: > > Hi all, > > I noticed that there is a draft intents to classify the various yang model, > it is really a meaningful work. Many points are consistent with my > understanding, whereas, there are some