The NETCONF and NETMOD chairs are actively discussing how we might move content
around between drafts maintained by the two groups. Resolving this
notification statement issue is part of that. Here are some of my thoughts
about this:
1) I think that YANG is primarily used to define the
On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 4:41 AM, Ladislav Lhotka wrote:
> Hi Balazs,
>
> I agree that such a mechanism would be pretty useful.
>
> I think though that the deviation-based approach can be used without
> further ado. Why do you think that the "deviate" statement cannot handle
>
> On 25 Jan 2017, at 16:13, Balazs Lengyel wrote:
>
> Hello Lada,
>
> Thanks for the support, I would like to get this in as a workgroup document
> soon.
>
> Deviations are conceptually used to define ugly limitations. The yang-push
> group agreed it would be a
Hi Balazs,
Yes we do agree, that there is a need to associate additional
information with the data modeled objects, based on the use cases the kind
of information required and interpretation would vary.
So we had defined a generic extension for annotations, as per the
below draft (which
The following errata report has been verified for RFC7950,
"The YANG 1.1 Data Modeling Language".
--
You may review the report below and at:
http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=7950=4916
--
Status: Verified
Benoit Claise wrote:
> On 1/24/2017 8:26 PM, Martin Bjorklund wrote:
> > Kent Watsen wrote:
> >> Hi Andy,
> >>
> >> I think this discussion has come to a head. Please submit an updated
> >> 6087bis as soon as you can. Some comments:
> >>
> >>
> >> 1) on
On 1/24/2017 8:26 PM, Martin Bjorklund wrote:
Kent Watsen wrote:
Hi Andy,
I think this discussion has come to a head. Please submit an updated 6087bis
as soon as you can. Some comments:
1) on the 3rd line below, should the text clarify that --ietf is only for IETF
Dear all,
This looks correct to me according to section 7.17.1
Need one more pair of eyes to double-check before approving.
Regards, Benoit
The following errata report has been submitted for RFC7950,
"The YANG 1.1 Data Modeling Language".
--
You may review
Hello,
As a result of work coming from the Yangpush effort I just posted a draft
https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-lengyel-netmod-schema-annotation-00
This proposes a way to extend YANG modules with extra properties for
specific schema nodes without modifying the text of the original YANG