Re: [netmod] WG Last Call: draft-ietf-netmod-acl-model-15

> On Jan 20, 2018, at 7:21 AM, Kent Watsen wrote: > > Hi Mahesh, > > I'm okay not adding the ability to reference an external rulebase now, or are > you saying that you'd also like to defer priming the YANG model now so that > it can be added later in a backwards

Re: [netmod] schema mount and YANG library

Dean writes: " At the end, if we need to we can revise to support future publications." I write: "Just a clarification on your last sentence, my understanding is that a revision is necessary in order for schema-mount to work on NMDA-based servers. Should we publish the current draft as is

Re: [netmod] schema mount and YANG library

Hi Dean, "As Lou mentioned, schema mount can be used with or without YANG library. As author who uses the schema mount in a draft and in product, don’t want to hold back the publication. We, IETF, are too slow. Getting data model RFCs published takes too much time and we are not getting

Re: [netmod] schema mount and YANG library

As Lou mentioned, schema mount can be used with or without YANG library. As author who uses the schema mount in a draft and in product, don’t want to hold back the publication. We, IETF, are too slow. Getting data model RFCs published takes too much time and we are not getting experience from

Re: [netmod] Regarding IPR on draft-bierman-netmod-yang-data-ext-01

"No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft" Andy On Sat, Jan 20, 2018 at 8:06 AM, Lou Berger wrote: > Authors, Contributors, WG, > > As part of the preparation for WG adoption: > > Are you aware of any IPR that applies to drafts identified above? > > Please

Re: [netmod] Regarding IPR on draft-bierman-netmod-yang-data-ext-01

No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft Kent // co-author = original message = Authors, Contributors, WG, As part of the preparation for WG adoption: Are you aware of any IPR that applies to drafts identified above? Please state either: "No, I'm not aware of any IPR

[netmod] Publication has been requested for draft-ietf-netmod-rfc6087bis-16

Kent Watsen has requested publication of draft-ietf-netmod-rfc6087bis-16 as Best Current Practice on behalf of the NETMOD working group. Please verify the document's state at https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-netmod-rfc6087bis/ ___ netmod

[netmod] The NETMOD WG has placed draft-bierman-netmod-yang-data-ext in state "Candidate for WG Adoption"

The NETMOD WG has placed draft-bierman-netmod-yang-data-ext in state Candidate for WG Adoption (entered by Lou Berger) The document is available at https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-bierman-netmod-yang-data-ext/ Comment: IPR Poll started:

[netmod] Regarding IPR on draft-bierman-netmod-yang-data-ext-01

Authors, Contributors, WG, As part of the preparation for WG adoption: Are you aware of any IPR that applies to drafts identified above? Please state either: "No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft" or "Yes, I'm aware of IPR that applies to this draft" If so, has this IPR

Re: [netmod] rfc6087bis shepherd writeup issues

Thank you, Andy. All issues have been addressed. I'll submit the shepherd writeup shortly. Kent // shepherd On 1/18/18, 5:11 PM, "Andy Bierman" > wrote: Hi, I posted draft-16 which has all changes below except the unused reference for RFC 5378.

Re: [netmod] WG Last Call: draft-ietf-netmod-acl-model-15

Hi Mahesh, I'm okay not adding the ability to reference an external rulebase now, or are you saying that you'd also like to defer priming the YANG model now so that it can be added later in a backwards compatible manner? If you plan to prime the YANG model so that the ability to reference an