Dear Lou Berger,
The session(s) that you have requested have been scheduled.
Below is the scheduled session information followed by
the original request.
netmod Session 1 (2:00:00)
Tuesday, Afternoon Session II 1550-1820
Room Name: Blenheim size: 200
-
Guys,
Before we start proposing whole set of changes, please verify that the model is
not doing what it was supposed to. The only difference between the changes
below and what is in the model is that instead of it being a repeat for source
and destination ports, the code below exists as a group
So it this a possible way out of the current situation? We publish a
trimmed down document that just defines the mount point extension and
we do an update of this document that adds all the details needed to
obtain the schema information?
/js
+1
This was something I suggested a while back. Th
What Kristian and I discussed, what Sonal and I had discussed, and what I
thought we had accepted as a proposed change was something like:
choice source-port-range-or-operator {
case range {
leaf source-port-lower {
type inet:port-number;
must ". <= ../source
This edit doesn't seem correct to me because now we have a choice with a
single case, with range having been removed. Can we please revert and
proceed?
On 26.02.18 20:24, Mahesh Jethanandani wrote:
> A pull request to address LC, shepherd, this and the other comments,
> including derived-from(),
Juergen Schoenwaelder wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 26, 2018 at 04:09:21PM +0100, Martin Bjorklund wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Christian Hopps wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi Rob,
> > >
> > > You do realize that no-one trying to actually deploy and run networks
> > > cares about live-discovery of different schema per
On Tue, 2018-02-27 at 09:31 +0100, Juergen Schoenwaelder wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 26, 2018 at 04:09:21PM +0100, Martin Bjorklund wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Christian Hopps wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi Rob,
> > >
> > > You do realize that no-one trying to actually deploy and run networks
> > > cares about live
On Mon, Feb 26, 2018 at 04:09:21PM +0100, Martin Bjorklund wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Christian Hopps wrote:
> >
> > Hi Rob,
> >
> > You do realize that no-one trying to actually deploy and run networks
> > cares about live-discovery of different schema per datastore for the
> > same mount point right? L
