Re: [netmod] convert it and not throw an error was Re: 6021 ipv4-prefix

2019-05-03 Thread Christian Hopps
> On May 3, 2019, at 8:08 AM, tom petch wrote: > > - Original Message - > From: "Mikael Abrahamsson" > To: "Randy Presuhn" > Cc: > Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2019 12:35 PM > >> On Wed, 1 May 2019, Randy Presuhn wrote: >> >>> Hi - >>> >>> On 5/1/2019 12:46 PM, Mikael Abrahamsson

[netmod] I-D Action: draft-ietf-netmod-module-tags-08.txt

2019-05-03 Thread internet-drafts
A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories. This draft is a work item of the Network Modeling WG of the IETF. Title : YANG Module Tags Authors : Christian Hopps Lou Berger

Re: [netmod] Alvaro Retana's No Objection on draft-ietf-netmod-module-tags-07: (with COMMENT)

2019-05-03 Thread Christian Hopps
> On Apr 11, 2019, at 9:30 AM, Alvaro Retana via Datatracker > wrote: > > Alvaro Retana has entered the following ballot position for > draft-ietf-netmod-module-tags-07: No Objection > > When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all > email addresses included in the

Re: [netmod] Benjamin Kaduk's Discuss on draft-ietf-netmod-module-tags-07: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

2019-05-03 Thread Christian Hopps
> On Apr 11, 2019, at 9:49 AM, Benjamin Kaduk via Datatracker > wrote: > > -- > DISCUSS: > -- > > I think this document does introduce new security

Re: [netmod] validating a YANG action

2019-05-03 Thread Andy Bierman
On Fri, May 3, 2019 at 9:53 AM Juergen Schoenwaelder < j.schoenwael...@jacobs-university.de> wrote: > On Fri, May 03, 2019 at 09:43:44AM -0700, Andy Bierman wrote: > > On Fri, May 3, 2019 at 2:20 AM Juergen Schoenwaelder < > > j.schoenwael...@jacobs-university.de> wrote: > > > > > On Fri, May 03,

Re: [netmod] validating a YANG action

2019-05-03 Thread Juergen Schoenwaelder
On Fri, May 03, 2019 at 09:43:44AM -0700, Andy Bierman wrote: > On Fri, May 3, 2019 at 2:20 AM Juergen Schoenwaelder < > j.schoenwael...@jacobs-university.de> wrote: > > > On Fri, May 03, 2019 at 01:10:58AM -0700, Andy Bierman wrote: > > > On Thu, May 2, 2019 at 10:57 PM Juergen Schoenwaelder < >

Re: [netmod] validating a YANG action

2019-05-03 Thread Andy Bierman
On Fri, May 3, 2019 at 2:20 AM Juergen Schoenwaelder < j.schoenwael...@jacobs-university.de> wrote: > On Fri, May 03, 2019 at 01:10:58AM -0700, Andy Bierman wrote: > > On Thu, May 2, 2019 at 10:57 PM Juergen Schoenwaelder < > > j.schoenwael...@jacobs-university.de> wrote: > > > > > On Thu, May

Re: [netmod] Management Protocol Roles: Client/Server vs Manager/Agent

2019-05-03 Thread Juergen Schoenwaelder
On Fri, May 03, 2019 at 10:43:50AM +, Schwarz Albrecht (ETAS/ESY1) wrote: > Leading (for me) to a principle dilemma from (management) protocol > engineering perspective due to > a) Manager-to-Agent = 1:N > b) Client-to-Server = N:1 > c) and the mapping approach in NETCONF/NETMOD of

[netmod] convert it and not throw an error was Re: 6021 ipv4-prefix

2019-05-03 Thread tom petch
- Original Message - From: "Mikael Abrahamsson" To: "Randy Presuhn" Cc: Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2019 12:35 PM > On Wed, 1 May 2019, Randy Presuhn wrote: > > > Hi - > > > > On 5/1/2019 12:46 PM, Mikael Abrahamsson wrote: > > > >> Where is the text that tells the server implementor

[netmod] Management Protocol Roles: Client/Server vs Manager/Agent

2019-05-03 Thread Schwarz Albrecht (ETAS/ESY1)
Hello Andy, Juergen, I got a side question for clarification (which was perhaps already discussed years ago on the list, but I'm just starting to follow NETCONF & NETMOD activities): The management paradigm and management association is related to roles (Management) Manager (or Master) and

Re: [netmod] validating a YANG action

2019-05-03 Thread Juergen Schoenwaelder
On Fri, May 03, 2019 at 01:10:58AM -0700, Andy Bierman wrote: > On Thu, May 2, 2019 at 10:57 PM Juergen Schoenwaelder < > j.schoenwael...@jacobs-university.de> wrote: > > > On Thu, May 02, 2019 at 04:15:28PM -0700, Andy Bierman wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > The text about invoking actions in RFC

Re: [netmod] 6021 ipv4-prefix

2019-05-03 Thread Ladislav Lhotka
"Rob Wilton (rwilton)" writes: >> -Original Message- >> From: netmod On Behalf Of Ladislav Lhotka >> Sent: 02 May 2019 13:39 >> To: Mikael Abrahamsson ; Randy Presuhn >> >> Cc: netmod@ietf.org >> Subject: Re: [netmod] 6021 ipv4-prefix >> >> Mikael Abrahamsson writes: >> >> > On Wed,

Re: [netmod] validating a YANG action

2019-05-03 Thread Andy Bierman
On Thu, May 2, 2019 at 10:57 PM Juergen Schoenwaelder < j.schoenwael...@jacobs-university.de> wrote: > On Thu, May 02, 2019 at 04:15:28PM -0700, Andy Bierman wrote: > > Hi, > > > > The text about invoking actions in RFC 7950, sec. 7.15 is not clear > > about whether the ancestor data nodes have

Re: [netmod] Canonical value representations in typedefs [was RE: 6021 ipv4-prefix]

2019-05-03 Thread Ladislav Lhotka
Robert Varga writes: > On 02/05/2019 15:12, Ladislav Lhotka wrote: >>> But this really means that YANG has two sorts of typedefs: >>> >>> (i) A regular typedef which is just an alias for a base type, perhaps with >>> some additional refinements that can all be handled automatically (e.g. >>>