Re: [netmod] draft-ietf-netmod-nmda-diff - IPR verfication request

Joel, Corrected statement - No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft that has not been previously disclosed. Cheers, Jeff On Feb 26, 2020, 1:42 AM -0500, Jeff Tantsura , wrote: > Joel, > > No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft. > > Cheers, > Je

Re: [netmod] draft-ietf-netmod-nmda-diff - IPR verfication request

Joel, No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft. Cheers, Jeff > On Feb 17, 2020, at 11:44, Joel Jaeggli wrote: > > No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft smime.p7s Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature ___

Re: [netmod] WG Last Call: draft-ietf-netmod-sub-intf-vlan-model-05

Yes/support Cheers, Jeff > On Jul 9, 2019, at 17:15, Kent Watsen wrote: > > All, > > This starts a twelve-day working group last call for > draft-ietf-netmod-sub-intf-vlan-model-05. > > The working group last call ends on July 21 (the day before the NETMOD 105 > sessions). Please send

Re: [netmod] WG Last Call: draft-ietf-netmod-artwork-folding-02

Lou, I support the progress of the draft and it is ready for the publication. Regards, Jeff > On May 12, 2019, at 14:19, Lou Berger wrote: > > > All, > > This starts a two-week working group last call for > draft-ietf-netmod-artwork-folding-02 > > The working group last call ends on May

Re: [netmod] 6021 ipv4-prefix

+1 Cheers, Jeff > On Apr 18, 2019, at 6:12 AM, Lou Berger wrote: > > Having worked with UIs that have the behavior of accepting an > address/prefix-len and mapping it to a prefix, (i.e., network/prefix-len and > zeroing out the non-significant bits) - some users really like it as they >

Re: [netmod] 6991bis: address-with-prefix-length

What Kristian has proposed makes sense, in favor. Cheers, Jeff On Apr 1, 2019, 1:09 PM -0700, Kristian Larsson , wrote: > Hello Mahesh, > > On 2019-04-01 21:40, Mahesh Jethanandani wrote: > > > > > On Apr 1, 2019, at 10:29 AM, Martin Bjorklund wrote: > > > > > > I know that this type is

Re: [netmod] Adoption poll for draft-chopps-netmod-geo-location-01

yes/support Cheers, Jeff On Mar 26, 2019, 7:41 AM +0100, Rob Wilton (rwilton) , wrote: > Support. > > From: netmod On Behalf Of Kent Watsen > Sent: 25 March 2019 21:32 > To: netmod@ietf.org > Subject: [netmod] Adoption poll for draft-chopps-netmod-geo-location-01 > > This email begins a 2-week

Re: [netmod] Confirming draft-ietf-netmod-module-tags-03 consensus call

+1 Christian Regards, Jeff > On Nov 16, 2018, at 10:23, Andy Bierman wrote: > > > >> On Thu, Nov 15, 2018 at 6:57 PM Christian Hopps wrote: >> So I would now have a new tags server to store tags associated with the >> modules for each of my actual servers in my network? >> >> This seems

Re: [netmod] WG adoption poll draft-kwatsen-netmod-artwork-folding-08

Yes/support Cheers, Jeff On Oct 18, 2018, 6:12 AM -0700, Lou Berger , wrote: > All, > > This is start of a two week poll on making > draft-kwatsen-netmod-artwork-folding-08 a working group > document. Please send email to the list indicating "yes/support" or > "no/do not support". If indicating

Re: [netmod] WG adoption poll for draft-clemm-netmod-nmda-diff-00

Support as co-author Cheers, Jeff On Oct 1, 2018, 11:48 AM -0700, Kent Watsen , wrote: > The IETF 102 in-room poll should really good support to adopt > this draft, and no objections. > > This email starts an adoption poll for: > > https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-clemm-netmod-nmda-diff-00 > >

Re: [netmod] IPR poll on draft-clemm-netmod-nmda-diff-00

Kent, I’m not aware of any IPR that has not been disclosed. Thanks! Cheers, Jeff On Oct 1, 2018, 11:48 AM -0700, Kent Watsen , wrote: > This mail starts the IPR poll for draft-clemm-netmod-nmda-diff-00. > > Are you aware of any IPR that applies to this draft? If so, has this IPR been >

Re: [netmod] "iana" in yang modules' name/namespace/prefix

Same here, let’s focus on immediate problems, there are plenty of those... Regards, Jeff > On Jul 22, 2018, at 07:20, Acee Lindem (acee) > wrote: > > Hi Benoit, et al, > I couldn't agree more. The IETF has much more exigent issues with respect to > YANG models and the attendant protocol

Re: [netmod] Correction, date It ends Feb 20th Re: Adoption Poll: draft-rtgyangdt-netmod-module-tags-02

Yes/support On 2/6/18 3:47 PM, joel jaeggli wrote: Hi, This is the start of a *two* week poll on making draft-rtgyangdt-netmod-module-tags-02 a working group document. https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-rtgyangdt-netmod-module-tags-02 This document was most recently discussed at IETF

Re: [netmod] Live meeting? and my opinion. [Re: moving forward with schema mount]

+1 Dean. I’m having this discussion on daily bases... I do care about sustainability and long term growth though Regards, Jeff > On Jan 26, 2018, at 07:30, Dean Bogdanovic wrote: > > I will ask a different question > > How many people have implemented the draft? And are

Re: [netmod] schema mount and YANG library

+1, with Acee Cheers, Jeff On 1/22/18, 08:18, "netmod on behalf of Acee Lindem (acee)" wrote: Hi Lada, My primary concern is that the YANG Schema Mount delay will not only hold the NI/LNE but all the models that are dependent

Re: [netmod] WGLC - draft-ietf-netmod-yang-tree-diagrams

+1 to 2 Cheers, Jeff On 1/16/18, 07:41, "netmod on behalf of Martin Bjorklund" wrote: Vladimir Vassilev wrote: > On 01/16/2018 11:56 AM, Martin Bjorklund wrote: > > > Vladimir Vassilev

Re: [netmod] Augmentation to Groupings

+1 Very much needed capability Regards, Jeff > On Dec 19, 2017, at 08:45, Xufeng Liu wrote: > > During the discussions of TE tunnel and topology models, we have found that > it is desirable to have the capability of augmenting a grouping. > > In our case, there

Re: [netmod] Joel Jaeggli as a third NETMOD co-chair

Welcome Joel! Cheers, Jeff From: netmod on behalf of Kent Watsen Date: Friday, December 15, 2017 at 13:03 To: Lou Berger Cc: "EXT - joe...@bogus.com" , NETMOD Working Group Subject:

Re: [netmod] WG Last Call: draft-ietf-netmod-schema-mount-07

Yes/support! Very important work with many other drafts depending on. Regards, Jeff > On Oct 20, 2017, at 14:37, Kent Watsen wrote: > > All, > > This starts a two-week working group last call on > draft-ietf-netmod-schema-mount-07. > > The working group last call ends on

Re: [netmod] WG adoption poll draft-acee-netmod-rfc8022bis-03

Yes/support Jeff >> On 13/10/2017 15:37, Kent Watsen wrote: >> All, >> >> Now that we have resolved the module naming issue on the list (i.e. >> that keeps the original rfc module names and updates the unwanted >> legacy nodes to have status 'obsolete'), rather than wait for the >> changes to

Re: [netmod] WG adoption poll draft-bjorklund-netmod-yang-tree-diagrams

yes/support (TM for Acee() Cheers, Jeff On 4/7/17, 7:22 PM, "netmod on behalf of Kent Watsen" wrote: >All, > >This is start of a two-week poll on making the following draft a >NETMOD working group

Re: [netmod] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-netmod-acl-model-09 (until Oct 27, 2016)

Yes/support Cheers, Jeff This is a notice to start a two-week NETMOD WG last call for the document: Network Access Control List (ACL) YANG Data Model https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-netmod-acl-model-09 Please indicate your support