Yes/support Jeff >> On 13/10/2017 15:37, Kent Watsen wrote: >> All, >> >> Now that we have resolved the module naming issue on the list (i.e. >> that keeps the original rfc module names and updates the unwanted >> legacy nodes to have status 'obsolete'), rather than wait for the >> changes to be made in the individual document, we'd like to move >> ahead with the adoption now, with the understanding that these >> changes will be made in the -01 version of the adopted draft. >> >> This is start of a two-week poll on making draft-acee-netmod-rfc8022bis-03 >> a working group document. Please send email to the list indicating >> "yes/support" or "no/do not support". If indicating no, please state >> your reservations with the document. If yes, please also feel free to >> provide comments you'd like to see addressed once the document is a WG >> document. >> >> The poll ends Oct 27. >> >> Thanks, >> Kent (and Lou) >> >> _______________________________________________ >> netmod mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod >> . >> > > _______________________________________________ > netmod mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
_______________________________________________ netmod mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
