On 2016-09-02 00:14, Phil Shafer wrote:
> Martin Bjorklund writes:
>> See Section 1.1 (Summary of Changes from RFC 6020)
>
> I may be missing something but it says:
>
> o Allow "choice" as a shorthand "case" statement (see
> Section 7.9.2).
>
> which is definitely in 6020.
No, it
Martin Bjorklund writes:
>See Section 1.1 (Summary of Changes from RFC 6020)
I may be missing something but it says:
o Allow "choice" as a shorthand "case" statement (see
Section 7.9.2).
which is definitely in 6020.
Thanks,
Phil
___
Phil Shafer wrote:
> rfc-edi...@rfc-editor.org writes:
> >A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries.
> >RFC 7950
> >Title: The YANG 1.1 Data Modeling Language
>
> I don't see a "changes since YANG-1.0" section. Is this
rfc-edi...@rfc-editor.org writes:
>A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries.
>RFC 7950
>Title: The YANG 1.1 Data Modeling Language
I don't see a "changes since YANG-1.0" section. Is this information
recorded somewhere?
Thanks,
Phil
A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries.
RFC 7950
Title: The YANG 1.1 Data Modeling Language
Author: M. Bjorklund, Ed.
Status: Standards Track
Stream: IETF
Date: August 2016