Re: [netmod] YANG 1.1 final review of the edits resulting from the IESG process

Juergen Schoenwaelder wrote: > On Fri, Jun 10, 2016 at 01:06:42PM +0200, Juergen Schoenwaelder wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Martin has posted revision -13 of the YANG 1.1 specification. This > > revision incorporates all comments that we have received during the >

Re: [netmod] YANG 1.1 final review of the edits resulting from the IESG process

On Fri, Jun 10, 2016 at 01:06:42PM +0200, Juergen Schoenwaelder wrote: > Hi, > > Martin has posted revision -13 of the YANG 1.1 specification. This > revision incorporates all comments that we have received during the > IESG process. A big thanks in particular to our gen-art and ops-dir >

Re: [netmod] YANG 1.1 final review of the edits resulting from the IESG process

> On 10 Jun 2016, at 15:48, Martin Bjorklund wrote: > > Ladislav Lhotka wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I don't want to open a new round of discussion about the leafref >> issue, but I think the text in sec. 9.9 isn't correct: >> >> - The first paragraph says that "path"

Re: [netmod] YANG 1.1 final review of the edits resulting from the IESG process

Thank you Jürgen and Martin. The document really improved IMO. Regards, Benoit Hi, Martin has posted revision -13 of the YANG 1.1 specification. This revision incorporates all comments that we have received during the IESG process. A big thanks in particular to our gen-art and ops-dir

[netmod] YANG 1.1 final review of the edits resulting from the IESG process

Hi, Martin has posted revision -13 of the YANG 1.1 specification. This revision incorporates all comments that we have received during the IESG process. A big thanks in particular to our gen-art and ops-dir reviewers and to Martin for following up on the issues. Please check the edits do make