Re: [netmod] draft-ietf-netmod-acl-model status

Tom, One mailing list suggestion was using yang 1.1 construct. If we do it without that suggestion, then the model doesn’t require update, but it is better with this suggestion Dean > On Feb 3, 2016, at 7:52 PM, Nadeau Thomas wrote: > > > Will your model

Re: [netmod] draft-ietf-netmod-acl-model status

Tom, We will publish ACL model requiring YANG 1.1 as per discussion on the list Dean > On Feb 3, 2016, at 4:35 PM, Lisa (Yi) Huang wrote: > > Tom, > > We discussed the review comments in the working group in offline meeting. > Will publish a new draft to address

Re: [netmod] draft-ietf-netmod-acl-model status

Will your model require any updates once 1.1 is ratified? We don’t want to predicate having a bunch of models move forward on the 1.1 work moving forward. —Tom > On Feb 3, 2016:11:45 AM, at 11:45 AM, Dean Bogdanovic > wrote: > > Tom, > > We will

[netmod] draft-ietf-netmod-acl-model status

ACL Doc Authors: What is your status and plan to address the numerous technical comments that have arisen since the WG LC? I know there are for example, numerous detailed comments from Juergen and I think Elliot Lear posted some too. —Tom