Hello Kent,
I understand your issue with the RestConf format. It is very
relevant to my Use Case 2: Preloading Data.
However I wrote:
The JSON format SHALL follow the format of the reply returned for a
RESTCONF GET request directed at the datastore resource:
On 3/9/2018 2:27 AM, Adam Roach wrote:
On 3/8/18 12:18 PM, Clyde Wildes (cwildes) wrote:
Adam,
An earlier version of the model (draft-ietf-netmod-syslog-model-08
and prior) included “terminal” as a syslog destination which
addresses your requirement below:
+--rw terminal {termi
Hi,
On Thu, Mar 08, 2018 at 04:08:32PM -0800, Andy Bierman wrote:
I don't really know what a guideline should say about patterns.
I will try to add something that says to document the pattern limitations
and keep the pattern as simple as possible,
I object to a statement that "pattern should b
Hi Clyde,
On Thu, Mar 8, 2018, at 9:28 PM, Clyde Wildes (cwildes) wrote:
> Alexey,
>
> Your minor comments are addressed below…
>
> On 3/6/18, 12:06 PM, "Alexey Melnikov" wrote:
> >
> --
> COMMENT:
> --
Hi Adam,
On 08/03/2018 23:55, Adam Roach wrote:
Thanks for your quick response! I have some additional comments inline.
Clearly, the items that have already been published can't be changed,
but it seems like there is room for guidance about whether to optimize
for simple regexes, or for
From: netmod on behalf of "Robert Wilton -X (rwilton
- ENSOFT LIMITED at Cisco)"
Date: Friday, March 9, 2018 at 9:59 AM
To: Adam Roach , Andy Bierman
Cc: NetMod WG Chairs ,
"draft-ietf-netmod-rfc6087...@ietf.org"
, The IESG , NetMod WG
Subject: Re: [netmod] Adam Roach's No Objection on
d
On Fri, Mar 09, 2018 at 03:22:26PM +0100, Benoit Claise wrote:
> Hi,
> > On Thu, Mar 08, 2018 at 04:08:32PM -0800, Andy Bierman wrote:
> > > I don't really know what a guideline should say about patterns.
> > > I will try to add something that says to document the pattern limitations
> > > and keep
On Fri, Mar 9, 2018 at 7:54 AM, Juergen Schoenwaelder <
j.schoenwael...@jacobs-university.de> wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 09, 2018 at 03:22:26PM +0100, Benoit Claise wrote:
> > Hi,
> > > On Thu, Mar 08, 2018 at 04:08:32PM -0800, Andy Bierman wrote:
> > > > I don't really know what a guideline should say
On 3/9/18 9:35 AM, Acee Lindem (acee) wrote:
As the editor of RFC 8294, I can confirm that we did not reach
consensus on whether to use easily understandable regular expressions
versus regular expressions that precisely validate the input string.
During the protracted Working Group last call
> I came up with 2 sentences to add to 6087bis:
>
> #1)
>
> If the patterns used in a type definition have known limitations
> such as false positive matches, then these limitations
> SHOULD be documented within the typedef or data definition.
I like this, but it would be better to also mention
Hi,
A draft agenda has been uploaded (a couple of days ago). See
https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/101/materials/agenda-101-netmod.txt
I just updated it with a recent request, and there is one additional
topic that may be added.
Please take a look and verify that your request has bee
11 matches
Mail list logo
