Re: [netmod] Alexey Melnikov's Discuss on draft-ietf-netmod-module-tags-07: (with DISCUSS)

Hi - On 2/17/2020 3:15 AM, Christian Hopps wrote: ... > BTW, I did look at the "SHOULD be avoided" (occurs twice that I saw) once dealing with LFs and CRs which lucky for us is not part of a tags allowable characters. There are lots of other things that complicate life.  The Yang string

Re: [netmod] Alexey Melnikov's Discuss on draft-ietf-netmod-module-tags-07: (with DISCUSS)

On Mon, Feb 17, 2020 at 10:40:30AM -0500, Christian Hopps wrote: > > > > On Feb 17, 2020, at 9:07 AM, Rob Wilton (rwilton) wrote: > > > > Hi Juergen, > > > > Please see inline ... > > > >> -Original Message- > >> From: Schönwälder, Jürgen > >> Sent: 14 February 2020 14:31 > >> To:

Re: [netmod] Alexey Melnikov's Discuss on draft-ietf-netmod-module-tags-07: (with DISCUSS)

> On Feb 17, 2020, at 9:07 AM, Rob Wilton (rwilton) wrote: > > Hi Juergen, > > Please see inline ... > >> -Original Message- >> From: Schönwälder, Jürgen >> Sent: 14 February 2020 14:31 >> To: Rob Wilton (rwilton) >> Cc: Alexey Melnikov ; netmod@ietf.org; Joel >> Jaeggli ;

[netmod] WGLC - Comparison of NMDA datastores - draft-ietf-netmod-nmda-diff-03

Greetings, This was supposed to get processed shortly after IETF 106, however I lost track of it. We are therefore running a 2 week WGLC on draft-ietf-netmod-nmda-diff-03. https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-netmod-nmda-diff/ the 02 - 03 diff is available here:

Re: [netmod] Alexey Melnikov's Discuss on draft-ietf-netmod-module-tags-07: (with DISCUSS)

Hi - On 2/17/2020 11:47 AM, Christian Hopps wrote: On Feb 17, 2020, at 11:51 AM, Randy Presuhn wrote: Hi - On 2/17/2020 3:15 AM, Christian Hopps wrote: ... BTW, I did look at the "SHOULD be avoided" (occurs twice that I saw) once dealing with LFs and CRs which lucky for us is not part of a

Re: [netmod] Implicit case statementa

A YANG-Next issue has been created to track a fix for this issue: https://github.com/netmod-wg/yang-next/issues/103 Kent > On Feb 14, 2020, at 6:48 AM, tom petch wrote: > > _ > From: netmod on behalf of

Re: [netmod] Alexey Melnikov's Discuss on draft-ietf-netmod-module-tags-07: (with DISCUSS)

On 2020-02-17 23:14, Christian Hopps wrote: > > >> On Feb 17, 2020, at 4:42 PM, Randy Presuhn wrote: >> >> Hi - >> >> On 2/17/2020 11:47 AM, Christian Hopps wrote: On Feb 17, 2020, at 11:51 AM, Randy Presuhn wrote: Hi - On 2/17/2020 3:15 AM, Christian Hopps wrote: ... > BTW, I did

Re: [netmod] Alexey Melnikov's Discuss on draft-ietf-netmod-module-tags-07: (with DISCUSS)

> On Feb 17, 2020, at 12:09 PM, Schönwälder, Jürgen > wrote: > > IANA assigned > +tags must conform to Net-Unicode as defined in RFC 5198 and they shall > +not need normalization. Seems good to me. Changed locally. Thanks, Chris. ___ netmod

Re: [netmod] Alexey Melnikov's Discuss on draft-ietf-netmod-module-tags-07: (with DISCUSS)

> On Feb 17, 2020, at 4:42 PM, Randy Presuhn > wrote: > > Hi - > > On 2/17/2020 11:47 AM, Christian Hopps wrote: >>> On Feb 17, 2020, at 11:51 AM, Randy Presuhn >>> wrote: Hi - On 2/17/2020 3:15 AM, >>> Christian Hopps wrote: ... BTW, I did look at the "SHOULD be avoided" (occurs

Re: [netmod] Alexey Melnikov's Discuss on draft-ietf-netmod-module-tags-07: (with DISCUSS)

FWIUW, I created a YANG-Next issue to track the needed long-term update to RFC 7950: https://github.com/netmod-wg/yang-next/issues/102 Kent > On Feb 17, 2020, at 5:31 PM, Per Hedeland wrote: > > On 2020-02-17 23:14, Christian Hopps wrote:

[netmod] draft-ietf-netmod-nmda-diff - IPR verfication request

Authors, Contributors, WG, As part of the preparation for WG Last Call: Are you aware of any IPR that applies to drafts identified above? Please state either: "No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft" or "Yes, I'm aware of IPR that applies to this draft" If so, has this IPR

Re: [netmod] Alexey Melnikov's Discuss on draft-ietf-netmod-module-tags-07: (with DISCUSS)

> On Feb 17, 2020, at 11:51 AM, Randy Presuhn > wrote: > > Hi - > > On 2/17/2020 3:15 AM, Christian Hopps wrote: > ... > > BTW, I did look at the "SHOULD be avoided" (occurs twice that I saw) once > > dealing with LFs and CRs which lucky for us is not part of a tags allowable > >

Re: [netmod] Alexey Melnikov's Discuss on draft-ietf-netmod-module-tags-07: (with DISCUSS)

On 2020-02-17 20:47, Christian Hopps wrote: > > >> On Feb 17, 2020, at 11:51 AM, Randy Presuhn wrote: >> >> Hi - >> >> On 2/17/2020 3:15 AM, Christian Hopps wrote: >> ... >>> BTW, I did look at the "SHOULD be avoided" (occurs twice that I saw) once dealing with LFs and CRs which lucky for us

Re: [netmod] Alexey Melnikov's Discuss on draft-ietf-netmod-module-tags-07: (with DISCUSS)

Hi - On 2/17/2020 2:14 PM, Christian Hopps wrote: ... If you are talking about the property categories (where I see 'Z' mentioned as "All separators") then there doesn't appear to be a "lower means include, upper means exclude" relationship. Also it appears that to refer to one of these

Re: [netmod] Alexey Melnikov's Discuss on draft-ietf-netmod-module-tags-07: (with DISCUSS)

> On Feb 14, 2020, at 1:05 PM, Randy Presuhn > wrote: > > Hi - > > On 2/14/2020 3:21 AM, Christian Hopps wrote: >> How about I add this to the description of "typedef tag" in the module: >> >>description >> "A tag is a type 'string' value that does not include carriage >>

Re: [netmod] Alexey Melnikov's Discuss on draft-ietf-netmod-module-tags-07: (with DISCUSS)

Hi Juergen, Please see inline ... > -Original Message- > From: Schönwälder, Jürgen > Sent: 14 February 2020 14:31 > To: Rob Wilton (rwilton) > Cc: Alexey Melnikov ; netmod@ietf.org; Joel > Jaeggli ; Christian Hopps ; The IESG > > Subject: Re: [netmod] Alexey Melnikov's Discuss on

[netmod] Publication has been requested for draft-ietf-netmod-factory-default-12

Kent Watsen has requested publication of draft-ietf-netmod-factory-default-12 as Proposed Standard on behalf of the NETMOD working group. Please verify the document's state at https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-netmod-factory-default/ ___