Hi,
RFC7950 section 7.9.2. says that if a “case” statement is omitted (i.e. “case”
shorthand) and implicit “case” node is created, schema node identifiers MUST
always explicitly include the implicit “case” node identifiers. So the
following snippet from yang model (below) is valid for Yang 1.1.
Hi everybody,
we have encountered the following issue:
augment "/other:module" {
container foo {
presence "some reason";
leaf bar {
mandatory true;
}
}
}
We assume the augment is incorrect due to mandatory leaf "bar" and target node
in another module. Is it
