Re: [netmod] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC8342 (5362)

2018-05-17 Thread Juergen Schoenwaelder
I agree, we screwed this up. These references should have not been
updated to the new versions.

/js

On Wed, May 16, 2018 at 09:25:34PM -0700, RFC Errata System wrote:
> The following errata report has been submitted for RFC8342,
> "Network Management Datastore Architecture (NMDA)".
> 
> --
> You may review the report below and at:
> http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid5362
> 
> --
> Type: Editorial
> Reported by: Rohit R Ranade 
> 
> Section: 2
> 
> Original Text
> -
> The convention adopted by the interfaces
>data model [RFC8343] and the IP data model [RFC8344] was to use two
>separate branches rooted at the root of the data tree: one branch for
>configuration data objects and one branch for operational state data
>objects.
> 
> 
> Corrected Text
> --
> The convention adopted by the interfaces
>data model [RFC7223] and the IP data model [RFC7277] was to use two
>separate branches rooted at the root of the data tree: one branch for
>configuration data objects and one branch for operational state data
>objects.
> 
> 
> Notes
> -
> The duplication of definition and separation of operational state data and 
> configuration data happened in RFC7223 and RFC7277. RFC8343 and RFC8344 have 
> corrected this using NMDA architecture
> 
> Instructions:
> -
> This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please
> use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or
> rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party  
> can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. 
> 
> --
> RFC8342 (draft-ietf-netmod-revised-datastores-10)
> --
> Title   : Network Management Datastore Architecture (NMDA)
> Publication Date: March 2018
> Author(s)   : M. Bjorklund, J. Schoenwaelder, P. Shafer, K. Watsen, 
> R. Wilton
> Category: PROPOSED STANDARD
> Source  : Network Modeling
> Area: Operations and Management
> Stream  : IETF
> Verifying Party : IESG

-- 
Juergen Schoenwaelder   Jacobs University Bremen gGmbH
Phone: +49 421 200 3587 Campus Ring 1 | 28759 Bremen | Germany
Fax:   +49 421 200 3103 

___
netmod mailing list
netmod@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod


Re: [netmod] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC8342 (5362)

2018-05-17 Thread Martin Bjorklund
Ignas Bagdonas  wrote:
> Hi there,
> 
> Reading the text, this errata appears to be correct - the previous
> obsoleted versions had separate branches, not the new NMDA based ones.

I agree.

> Authors, would you object to this?

No, this errata should be accepted.

However, the Informative References section (10.2) also needs to be
updated.


/martin

> 
> Thank you.
> 
> Ignas
> 
> 
> 
> On 17/05/2018 05:25, RFC Errata System wrote:
> > The following errata report has been submitted for RFC8342,
> > "Network Management Datastore Architecture (NMDA)".
> >
> > --
> > You may review the report below and at:
> > http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid5362
> >
> > --
> > Type: Editorial
> > Reported by: Rohit R Ranade 
> >
> > Section: 2
> >
> > Original Text
> > -
> > The convention adopted by the interfaces
> > data model [RFC8343] and the IP data model [RFC8344] was to use two
> > separate branches rooted at the root of the data tree: one branch for
> > configuration data objects and one branch for operational state data
> > objects.
> >
> >
> > Corrected Text
> > --
> > The convention adopted by the interfaces
> > data model [RFC7223] and the IP data model [RFC7277] was to use two
> > separate branches rooted at the root of the data tree: one branch for
> > configuration data objects and one branch for operational state data
> > objects.
> >
> >
> > Notes
> > -
> > The duplication of definition and separation of operational state data
> > and configuration data happened in RFC7223 and RFC7277. RFC8343 and
> > RFC8344 have corrected this using NMDA architecture
> >
> > Instructions:
> > -
> > This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please
> > use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or
> > rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party
> > can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary.
> >
> > --
> > RFC8342 (draft-ietf-netmod-revised-datastores-10)
> > --
> > Title   : Network Management Datastore Architecture (NMDA)
> > Publication Date: March 2018
> > Author(s) : M. Bjorklund, J. Schoenwaelder, P. Shafer, K. Watsen,
> > R. Wilton
> > Category: PROPOSED STANDARD
> > Source  : Network Modeling
> > Area: Operations and Management
> > Stream  : IETF
> > Verifying Party : IESG
> 

___
netmod mailing list
netmod@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod