Ignas Bagdonas <ibagd...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi there,
> 
> Reading the text, this errata appears to be correct - the previous
> obsoleted versions had separate branches, not the new NMDA based ones.

I agree.

> Authors, would you object to this?

No, this errata should be accepted.

However, the Informative References section (10.2) also needs to be
updated.


/martin

> 
> Thank you.
> 
> Ignas
> 
> 
> 
> On 17/05/2018 05:25, RFC Errata System wrote:
> > The following errata report has been submitted for RFC8342,
> > "Network Management Datastore Architecture (NMDA)".
> >
> > --------------------------------------
> > You may review the report below and at:
> > http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid5362
> >
> > --------------------------------------
> > Type: Editorial
> > Reported by: Rohit R Ranade <rohitrran...@huawei.com>
> >
> > Section: 2
> >
> > Original Text
> > -------------
> > The convention adopted by the interfaces
> >     data model [RFC8343] and the IP data model [RFC8344] was to use two
> >     separate branches rooted at the root of the data tree: one branch for
> >     configuration data objects and one branch for operational state data
> >     objects.
> >
> >
> > Corrected Text
> > --------------
> > The convention adopted by the interfaces
> >     data model [RFC7223] and the IP data model [RFC7277] was to use two
> >     separate branches rooted at the root of the data tree: one branch for
> >     configuration data objects and one branch for operational state data
> >     objects.
> >
> >
> > Notes
> > -----
> > The duplication of definition and separation of operational state data
> > and configuration data happened in RFC7223 and RFC7277. RFC8343 and
> > RFC8344 have corrected this using NMDA architecture
> >
> > Instructions:
> > -------------
> > This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please
> > use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or
> > rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party
> > can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary.
> >
> > --------------------------------------
> > RFC8342 (draft-ietf-netmod-revised-datastores-10)
> > --------------------------------------
> > Title               : Network Management Datastore Architecture (NMDA)
> > Publication Date    : March 2018
> > Author(s) : M. Bjorklund, J. Schoenwaelder, P. Shafer, K. Watsen,
> > R. Wilton
> > Category            : PROPOSED STANDARD
> > Source              : Network Modeling
> > Area                : Operations and Management
> > Stream              : IETF
> > Verifying Party     : IESG
> 

_______________________________________________
netmod mailing list
netmod@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod

Reply via email to