Re: [netmod] draft-ietf-netmod-rfc6087bis-16
Hi Tom,
I know where you're going with this, and I agree, but as we're past AD-review,
maybe this is a good candidate for guidelines-next?
https://github.com/netmod-wg/guidelines-next/issues
Kent // shepherd
- Original Message -
From: "Andy Bierman"
Sent: Wednesday, February 07, 2018 5:48 PM
> On Wed, Feb 7, 2018 at 4:58 AM, t.petch wrote:
>
> > Andy
> >
> > If an RFC is mentioned in a Description clause, should it also
appear in
> > the related Reference clause?
>
> yes -- there are many places in 6087bis that mention the
reference-stmt
>
> e.g.:
>
>If the notification semantics are defined in an external document
>(other than another YANG module indicated by an import statement),
>then a reference statement MUST be present.
>
> I cannot find any text that says it is OK or not OK to also put
> the reference in the description-stmt.
Andy
Just to be clear, what I am seeing is RFC in a Description clause in
a YANG module but not appearing anywhere else in the I-D, not in a
Reference clause or in the I-D Reference sections or anywhere.
e.g. in draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-yang
leaf uuid {
type yang:uuid;
description "A Universally Unique IDentifier in the string
representation
defined in RFC 4122.
4122 appears in three such Description clauses but nowhere else; I am
thinking that it should also be in a Reference clause as well
Tom Petch
> > draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-yang-05 has examples of this not being the
case,
> > as I mention in a recent post. I assumed that they should be but
cannot
> > see any discussion of this in RFC6087bis
> >
> > Tom Petch
> >
> >
> Andy
>
___
netmod mailing list
netmod@ietf.org
https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.ietf.org_mailman_listinfo_netmod&d=DwICAg&c=HAkYuh63rsuhr6Scbfh0UjBXeMK-ndb3voDTXcWzoCI&r=9zkP0xnJUvZGJ9EPoOH7Yhqn2gsBYaGTvjISlaJdcZo&m=CT9Hf4F4H2prnOg0sLp9WvPE51q0zSwxAufnFGEFI38&s=rKLyZFgHK884Wvw2Xj2gu2_xu6PRJDZekh3FgzhTzI0&e=
___
netmod mailing list
netmod@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
Re: [netmod] draft-ietf-netmod-rfc6087bis-16
- Original Message -
From: "Andy Bierman"
Sent: Wednesday, February 07, 2018 5:48 PM
> On Wed, Feb 7, 2018 at 4:58 AM, t.petch wrote:
>
> > Andy
> >
> > If an RFC is mentioned in a Description clause, should it also
appear in
> > the related Reference clause?
>
> yes -- there are many places in 6087bis that mention the
reference-stmt
>
> e.g.:
>
>If the notification semantics are defined in an external document
>(other than another YANG module indicated by an import statement),
>then a reference statement MUST be present.
>
> I cannot find any text that says it is OK or not OK to also put
> the reference in the description-stmt.
Andy
Just to be clear, what I am seeing is RFC in a Description clause in
a YANG module but not appearing anywhere else in the I-D, not in a
Reference clause or in the I-D Reference sections or anywhere.
e.g. in draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-yang
leaf uuid {
type yang:uuid;
description "A Universally Unique IDentifier in the string
representation
defined in RFC 4122.
4122 appears in three such Description clauses but nowhere else; I am
thinking that it should also be in a Reference clause as well
Tom Petch
> > draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-yang-05 has examples of this not being the
case,
> > as I mention in a recent post. I assumed that they should be but
cannot
> > see any discussion of this in RFC6087bis
> >
> > Tom Petch
> >
> >
> Andy
>
___
netmod mailing list
netmod@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
Re: [netmod] draft-ietf-netmod-rfc6087bis-16
On Wed, Feb 7, 2018 at 4:58 AM, t.petch wrote: > Andy > > If an RFC is mentioned in a Description clause, should it also appear in > the related Reference clause? > yes -- there are many places in 6087bis that mention the reference-stmt e.g.: If the notification semantics are defined in an external document (other than another YANG module indicated by an import statement), then a reference statement MUST be present. I cannot find any text that says it is OK or not OK to also put the reference in the description-stmt. > draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-yang-05 has examples of this not being the case, > as I mention in a recent post. I assumed that they should be but cannot > see any discussion of this in RFC6087bis > > Tom Petch > > Andy ___ netmod mailing list netmod@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
