Re: Dev Cl #1717 -- bug-tracker peeve

2014-02-13 Thread Jim Nagel
Brian Bailey wrote on 11 Feb: ... I'm not into guessology. # is not a British convention anyway so far as I am aware, for some 80ish years, it's a hindrance! Why put it there when it serves no useful purpose, I ask? You'd think the software behind the bug-tracker could simply ignore the # if

Re: Dev Cl #1717 -- bug-tracker peeve

2014-02-13 Thread Richard Porter
On 13 Feb 2014 Jim Nagel wrote: You'd think the software behind the bug-tracker could simply ignore the # if people type it in this box. It would seem natural enough for a user to type it, since # is shown loudclear in the Netsurf info box as part of the version number. Well there is a #

Re: Dev Cl #1717 -- bug-tracker peeve

2014-02-13 Thread Jim Nagel
Rob Kendrick wrote on 13 Feb: ...back then the same issue happened (occurs in revision field not accepting an r) and yet nobody complained! My point was just a general one that software needs to anticipate that different users might input stuff in ways that are obvious with hindsight. --

Dev Cl #1717

2014-02-11 Thread Brian
Re: http://500px.com/Valtsu does not render completely and crashes on 'PORTFOLIO'

Re: Dev Cl #1717

2014-02-11 Thread Peter Young
On 11 Feb 2014 Brian bbai...@argonet.co.uk wrote: Re: http://500px.com/Valtsu does not render completely and crashes on 'PORTFOLIO' Confirmed here. Are you going to report it on the bug tracker? I have the logfile here, so could do that, though today is a busy one. Off to Australia

Re: Dev Cl #1717

2014-02-11 Thread Brian
In article b00735d853.pnyo...@pnyoung.ormail.co.uk, Peter Young pnyo...@ormail.co.uk wrote: On 11 Feb 2014 Brian bbai...@argonet.co.uk wrote: Re: http://500px.com/Valtsu does not render completely and crashes on 'PORTFOLIO' Confirmed here. Are you going to report it on the bug

Re: Dev Cl #1717

2014-02-11 Thread Peter Young
On 11 Feb 2014 Brian bbai...@argonet.co.uk wrote: In article b00735d853.pnyo...@pnyoung.ormail.co.uk, Peter Young pnyo...@ormail.co.uk wrote: On 11 Feb 2014 Brian bbai...@argonet.co.uk wrote: Re: http://500px.com/Valtsu does not render completely and crashes on 'PORTFOLIO'

Re: Dev Cl #1717

2014-02-11 Thread Brian Jordan
In article 53d838bf45bbai...@argonet.co.uk, Brian bbai...@argonet.co.uk wrote: In article b00735d853.pnyo...@pnyoung.ormail.co.uk, Peter Young pnyo...@ormail.co.uk wrote: On 11 Feb 2014 Brian bbai...@argonet.co.uk wrote: Re: http://500px.com/Valtsu does not render completely

Re: Dev Cl #1717

2014-02-11 Thread Brian Jordan
In article d1cf3ad853.pnyo...@pnyoung.ormail.co.uk, Peter Young pnyo...@ormail.co.uk wrote: On 11 Feb 2014 Brian bbai...@argonet.co.uk wrote: In article b00735d853.pnyo...@pnyoung.ormail.co.uk, Peter Young pnyo...@ormail.co.uk wrote: On 11 Feb 2014 Brian bbai...@argonet.co.uk

Re: Dev Cl #1717

2014-02-11 Thread Brian Jordan
In article 53d83be5c4bbai...@argonet.co.uk, Brian bbai...@argonet.co.uk wrote: [Snip] Who'd have thought it?? Certainly not me. I'm intuitive but not that intuitive. I assumed that # was as per American practice and is part of any/all part codes. I think the logic is that the # is in the

Re: Dev Cl #1717

2014-02-11 Thread Brian
In article 53d83d6e6ebrian.jord...@btinternet.com, Brian Jordan brian.jord...@btinternet.com wrote: In article 53d83be5c4bbai...@argonet.co.uk, Brian bbai...@argonet.co.uk wrote: [Snip] Who'd have thought it?? Certainly not me. I'm intuitive but not that intuitive. I assumed that #

Re: Dev Cl #1717

2014-02-11 Thread Peter Young
On 11 Feb 2014 Peter Young pnyo...@ormail.co.uk wrote: On 11 Feb 2014 Brian bbai...@argonet.co.uk wrote: In article b00735d853.pnyo...@pnyoung.ormail.co.uk, Peter Young pnyo...@ormail.co.uk wrote: On 11 Feb 2014 Brian bbai...@argonet.co.uk wrote: Re: http://500px.com/Valtsu does