In message d55ad31754.andrew-...@waitrose.com
on 14 Jun 2014 Andrew Pinder andrew.pin...@tiscali.co.uk wrote:
In message mpro.n768be0c1izuo01q9.li...@stevefryatt.org.uk
on 14 Jun 2014 Steve Fryatt li...@stevefryatt.org.uk wrote:
I don't run NetSurf during the boot sequence -- are all the
Andrew Pinder, on 15 Jun, wrote:
In message d55ad31754.andrew-...@waitrose.com
on 14 Jun 2014 Andrew Pinder andrew.pin...@tiscali.co.uk wrote:
In message mpro.n768be0c1izuo01q9.li...@stevefryatt.org.uk
on 14 Jun 2014 Steve Fryatt li...@stevefryatt.org.uk wrote:
I don't run NetSurf
In article 9ed6811754.andrew-...@waitrose.com,
Andrew Pinder andrew.pin...@tiscali.co.uk wrote:
In message 20140613221516.gc1...@platypus.pepperfish.net
on 13 Jun 2014 Rob Kendrick r...@netsurf-browser.org wrote:
On Fri, Jun 13, 2014 at 09:42:54PM +0100, Andrew Pinder wrote:
Couple
In article 5418100903...@mightyoak.org.uk,
Bob Latham b...@mightyoak.org.uk wrote:
I've tried hiding !cache so I can control when it is filer_booted but it
still gives the problem.
I downloaded #1967 a day or so ago, merged the provided !Boot and !System
directories with my existing and I
is loaded before
!Cache is booted.
That is what is happening here but so far I have not seen the Not enough
application memory to start Basic error.
Raspberry Pi, OS5.21 (03-Jun-14).
Hope this helps.
--
David Pitt
David Pitt, on 14 Jun, wrote:
[snip - !Cache memory issues]
Have spent an entertaining morning with this the penny finally dropped.
All the NetSurf needs to run its cache is a value for Cache$Dir pointing to
the chosen location.
--
David Pitt
On 14/06/14 13:48, David Pitt wrote:
All the NetSurf needs to run its cache is a value for Cache$Dir
pointing to the chosen location.
Indeed. The original proposal for Cache by Rob Kendrick[1] simply set
two variables in its !Run file. These were:
Caches$Write - Expands to where you
In message 539c4cfe.6020...@netsurf-browser.org
on 14 Jun 2014 Michael Drake t...@netsurf-browser.org wrote:
We recently decided to make use of !Cache as we assumed it would be
suitable and correct. (None of the core developers are actually using
RISC OS at the moment, so we hadn't checked
On 14/06/14 14:30, Andrew Pinder wrote:
We recently decided to make use of !Cache as we assumed it would be
suitable and correct. (None of the core developers are actually using
RISC OS at the moment, so we hadn't checked it actually worked.)
If you give some clues as to how to test it,
In article 539c509c.8090...@netsurf-browser.org,
Michael Drake t...@netsurf-browser.org wrote:
Our options are to get Cache from
http://www.snowstone.org.uk/riscos/
fixed, and continue using it, or create our own simpler solution.
Having had a very *quick* look, it seems !Cache is
On 14 Jun, Michael Drake wrote in message
539c509c.8090...@netsurf-browser.org:
On 14/06/14 14:30, Andrew Pinder wrote:
We recently decided to make use of !Cache as we assumed it would be
suitable and correct. (None of the core developers are actually using
RISC OS at the
In article mpro.n768be0c1izuo01q9.li...@stevefryatt.org.uk,
Steve Fryatt li...@stevefryatt.org.uk wrote:
I don't run NetSurf during the boot sequence
Neither do I.
--
Chris Johnson
On 14 Jun 2014 Steve Fryatt li...@stevefryatt.org.uk wrote:
On 14 Jun, Michael Drake wrote in message
539c509c.8090...@netsurf-browser.org:
On 14/06/14 14:30, Andrew Pinder wrote:
We recently decided to make use of !Cache as we assumed it would be
suitable and correct. (None of
In message mpro.n768be0c1izuo01q9.li...@stevefryatt.org.uk
on 14 Jun 2014 Steve Fryatt li...@stevefryatt.org.uk wrote:
I don't run NetSurf during the boot sequence -- are all the people seeing
issues doing that? What are people's Next slots configured to during the
boot process?
On
I've been getting this error when the desktop starts since installing
NetSurf CI #1959. Clicking on Cancel allow the Boot to complete. I
mistakenly thought that installing CI #1965 had solved the problem.
Has anyone else had this problem?
Is it associated with the installation of the !Cache
In article bb69011754.andrew-...@waitrose.com,
Andrew Pinder andrew.pin...@tiscali.co.uk wrote:
I've been getting this error when the desktop starts since installing
NetSurf CI #1959. Clicking on Cancel allow the Boot to complete. I
mistakenly thought that installing CI #1965 had solved
On Fri, Jun 13, 2014 at 03:32:26PM +0100, Bob Latham wrote:
In article bb69011754.andrew-...@waitrose.com,
Andrew Pinder andrew.pin...@tiscali.co.uk wrote:
I've been getting this error when the desktop starts since installing
NetSurf CI #1959. Clicking on Cancel allow the Boot to
In message 20140613143931.gp3...@platypus.pepperfish.net
on 13 Jun 2014 Rob Kendrick r...@netsurf-browser.org wrote:
On Fri, Jun 13, 2014 at 03:32:26PM +0100, Bob Latham wrote:
In article bb69011754.andrew-...@waitrose.com,
Andrew Pinder andrew.pin...@tiscali.co.uk wrote:
I've been
On Fri, Jun 13, 2014 at 09:42:54PM +0100, Andrew Pinder wrote:
Couple people try moving it elsewhere (ie, outside !Boot.Resources), and
configure !Boot to look at !Cache *BEFORE* it looks at or runs
!NetSurf, and see if this solves the problem?
Well, that put it slightly *later* in the
19 matches
Mail list logo
