Re: User feedback requested (esp. RISC OS)
In article 52d7fa45b1t...@netsurf-browser.org, Michael Drake t...@netsurf-browser.org wrote: In article 52d7f97c49dhw...@talktalk.net, David H Wild dhw...@talktalk.net wrote: The readme file needs replacing, as it applies to the older system and tells you how to install the boot and system files which are not supplied with the new version. The !Boot and !System directories will be added at some point. I still think that the readme file should reflect what is in the ip file. It wouldn't be much work to change it when needed. -- David Wild using RISC OS on broadband www.davidhwild.me.uk
Re: User feedback requested (esp. RISC OS)
On Tue, 2012-10-02 at 09:53 +0100, David H Wild wrote: In article 52d7fa45b1t...@netsurf-browser.org, Michael Drake t...@netsurf-browser.org wrote: In article 52d7f97c49dhw...@talktalk.net, David H Wild dhw...@talktalk.net wrote: The readme file needs replacing, as it applies to the older system and tells you how to install the boot and system files which are not supplied with the new version. The !Boot and !System directories will be added at some point. I still think that the readme file should reflect what is in the ip file. It wouldn't be much work to change it when needed. Firstly, development builds come with a very large health warning as they represent the current state of development which, in all likelihood, is broken. Please don't confuse them with stable, numbered, release versions. Secondly, we have not yet announced the return of development builds for general use. Michael requested early feedback about the stability of the software only so we could see how widespread a problem the machine freezing behaviour was. There will be an announcement when development builds are available for general use; right now, they should be considered harmful. J.
Re: User feedback requested (esp. RISC OS)
On Tue, Oct 02, 2012 at 09:53:37AM +0100, David H Wild wrote: In article 52d7fa45b1t...@netsurf-browser.org, Michael Drake t...@netsurf-browser.org wrote: In article 52d7f97c49dhw...@talktalk.net, David H Wild dhw...@talktalk.net wrote: The readme file needs replacing, as it applies to the older system and tells you how to install the boot and system files which are not supplied with the new version. The !Boot and !System directories will be added at some point. I still think that the readme file should reflect what is in the ip file. It wouldn't be much work to change it when needed. Note what it says in big scary letters before you download test releases. I think we're in the best position to judge how much work it is and when we should spend our copious free time on doing it. B.
Re: User feedback requested (esp. RISC OS)
On Sat, 2012-09-29 at 21:54 +0100, Martin Bazley wrote: I've never had problems of this scale with any other site. Whatever andyfanton.com does, NetSurf really doesn't like it! In the interests of preventing this regression occurring a fifth time, perhaps 'Jenkins' could be amended to make sure NetSurf can cope with a fetch and display of that specific page? Stopping regressions what automated testing is for, right? A Jenkins job just runs a command. There is currently no infrastructure for this kind of testing. Patches to improve the situation are always welcome. J.
Re: User feedback requested (esp. RISC OS)
In article 52d6e2c396t...@netsurf-browser.org, Michael Drake t...@netsurf-browser.org wrote: CAUTION: SAVE ALL WORK BEFORE RUNNING THESE BUILDS We have at least one case of NetSurf freezing a RISC OS Iyonix such that it needs to be reset. We think this problem may gave been fixed by updating the autobuilder to use the GCCSDK 4.1.2 v2 release. Please could people who had the RISC OS 5 freeze problem test the latest build from http://ci.netsurf-browser.org/builds/riscos/ ? Best regards, -- Michael Drake (tlsa) http://www.netsurf-browser.org/
Re: User feedback requested (esp. RISC OS)
In article 1349168843.17266.11.camel@duiker, John-Mark Bell j...@netsurf-browser.org wrote: On Tue, 2012-10-02 at 09:53 +0100, David H Wild wrote: I still think that the readme file should reflect what is in the ip file. It wouldn't be much work to change it when needed. Once development builds are linked from the main NetSurf web site again we should have most of the is and ts dotted and crossed. :) Secondly, we have not yet announced the return of development builds for general use. Michael requested early feedback about the stability of the software only so we could see how widespread a problem the machine freezing behaviour was. There will be an announcement when development builds are available for general use; right now, they should be considered harmful. Indeed, sorry if that was unclear. -- Michael Drake (tlsa) http://www.netsurf-browser.org/
Re: User feedback requested (esp. RISC OS)
In message 52d84f6370st...@joyces.demon.co.uk Steve Joyce st...@joyces.demon.co.uk wrote: RISC OS 4.39 RPC Strongarm Using Netsurf-2012-09-30_10-23-17/zip Tried just a few websites. Looks ok on Demon and Amazon. Amazon site appears to work ok. However, streetmap.co.uk produced all the furniture but no map. None of the controls appear to do anything. Accepts postcode entry but does not produce map. No crash/lock-up so far. Steve Streetmap displays OK here. Iyonix 5.19 (26 Sept) Netsurf 2012-10-02_09-33-37 Dave Barrass
Re: User feedback requested (esp. RISC OS)
In article e34c53d852.dbarr...@davebarrass.sky.com, DB d.barr...@tesco.net wrote: In message 52d84f6370st...@joyces.demon.co.uk Steve Joyce st...@joyces.demon.co.uk wrote: RISC OS 4.39 RPC Strongarm Using Netsurf-2012-09-30_10-23-17/zip Tried just a few websites. Looks ok on Demon and Amazon. Amazon site appears to work ok. However, streetmap.co.uk produced all the furniture but no map. None of the controls appear to do anything. Accepts postcode entry but does not produce map. No crash/lock-up so far. Steve Streetmap displays OK here. Iyonix 5.19 (26 Sept) Netsurf 2012-10-02_09-33-37 And here. So does everything else I've tried so far. RiscPC 700 Adjust 4.39 with Unipod -- Chris
Re: User feedback requested (esp. RISC OS)
On 2 Oct 2012 Steve Joyce wrote: Tried just a few websites. Looks ok on Demon and Amazon. Amazon site appears to work ok. However, streetmap.co.uk produced all the furniture but no map. None of the controls appear to do anything. Accepts postcode entry but does not produce map. I always use oldmap.srf which works fine with NetSurf. However I normally use Fresco because it's much easier to save the page as a drawfile and delete all the clutter leaving just the grouped map sections (ungroup four times, deselect the map and delete the rest). Also it prints on the Calligraph. -- Richard Porterhttp://www.minijem.plus.com/ mailto:r...@minijem.plus.com I don't want a user experience - I just want stuff that works.
Re: User feedback requested (esp. RISC OS)
In article 1a4c5dd852.r...@user.minijem.plus.com, Richard Porter r...@minijem.plus.com wrote: On 2 Oct 2012 Steve Joyce wrote: Tried just a few websites. Looks ok on Demon and Amazon. Amazon site appears to work ok. However, streetmap.co.uk produced all the furniture but no map. None of the controls appear to do anything. Accepts postcode entry but does not produce map. I always use oldmap.srf Is that part of a URL? Can you clarify please. I tried www.oldmap.srf got a Could not resolve host message. -- Chris
Re: User feedback requested
Platform: RISC OS
using netsurf-2012-10-02_09-33-37/zip
RO 5.18 on Iyonix
Fault: NetSurf has to quit after rendering http://www.independent.co.uk/
I have an error log file. Tried sending it but complaints about
size of attachment. Last few lines:
(30.89) render/html.c html_convert_css_callback 1425: stylesheet
file:///Choices:WWW/NetSurf/User failed: UnacceptableType
(30.89) render/html.c html_convert_css_callback 1429: 0 fetches active
...
Fatal signal received: Segmentation fault
Stack backtrace:
Running thread 0x6a32c8
( 6abee4) pc: 528d64 lr:8a6d0 sp: 6abee8 __write_backtrace()
( 6abf10) pc:8a634 lr: 5295ac sp: 6abf14 ^ro_gui_signal()
( 6abf38) pc: 52959c lr: 5293d0 sp: 6abf3c __unixlib_exec_sig()
( 6abfa0) pc: 528e88 lr: 529bb0 sp: 6abfa4 __unixlib_raise_signal()
( 6abfb0) pc: 529ab4 lr:1d648 sp: 6aabc8 __h_cback()
Register dump at 006abfb4:
a1: 74786574 a2:5 a3:0 a4:0
v1:0 v2: 61bd4888 v3:0 v4: 6aacf4
v5:1 v6: 61bd4888 sl: 6aa208 fp: 6aabd4
ip: 6aabd8 sp: 6aabc8 lr:1d648 pc:11908
cpsr: 2010
000118f4 : ..» : bb149919 : BLLT00537D60
000118f8 : ..Pã : e350 : CMP R0,#0
000118fc : : 0a03 : BEQ 00011910
00011900 : ..å : e590 : LDR R0,[R0,#0]
00011904 : ..Pã : e350 : CMP R0,#0
00011908 : ... : 1590 : LDRNE R0,[R0,#0]
0001190c : .¨.é : e91ba800 : LDMDB R11,{R11,R13,PC}
00011910 : Q? ã : e3a03f51 : MOV R3,#0144 ; =324
00011914 : .0â : e2833001 : ADD R3,R3,#1
( 6aabd4) pc:118f0 lr:1d648 sp: 6aabd8
hlcache_handle_get_content()
( 6aabe4) pc:1d63c lr:590a0 sp: 6aabe8 nscss_get_stylesheet()
( 6aac54) pc:5900c lr:594a0 sp: 6aac58 html_finish_conversion()
( 6aac98) pc:593d0 lr:11ff8 sp: 6aac9c
^html_convert_css_callback()
( 6aad6c) pc:11f80 lr:12548 sp: 6aad70 ^hlcache_migrate_ctx()
( 6aade8) pc:12374 lr:134d4 sp: 6aadec ^hlcache_llcache_callback()
( 6aae1c) pc:13358 lr:13da0 sp: 6aae20
^llcache_object_notify_users()
( 6aae34) pc:13d78 lr:125f4 sp: 6aae38 llcache_poll()
( 6aae44) pc:125e8 lr:344b8 sp: 6aae48 hlcache_poll()
( 6aae5c) pc:34490 lr:8b284 sp: 6aae60 netsurf_main_loop()
( 6aafe8) pc:8ab9c lr: 5379c0 sp: 6aafec main()
I have no file called User in Choices:WWW/NetSurf. Could that be the problem?
So I made a copy of Choices:WWW/NetSurf/Choices and called it User. Still no go
but log file now
ends with
(117.13) render/html.c html_convert_css_callback 1419: 1 fetches active
(117.13) riscos/filetype.c fetch_filetype 84: unix_path =
'Choices:WWW.NetSurf.User'
(117.13) riscos/filetype.c fetch_filetype 93: riscos path
'Choices:WWW.NetSurf.User'
(117.14) render/html.c html_convert_css_callback 1425: stylesheet
file:///Choices:WWW/NetSurf/User failed: UnacceptableType
(117.14) render/html.c html_convert_css_callback 1429: 0 fetches active
So should Choices:WWW/NetSurf/User be a directory? I tried setting some
preferences but
no such directory got created. At this point I think I need some advice before
experimenting
further.
--
Gavin Wraith (ga...@wra1th.plus.com)
Home page: http://www.wra1th.plus.com/
Re: User feedback requested (esp. RISC OS)
On 2 Oct 2012 Chris Newman wrote: In article 1a4c5dd852.r...@user.minijem.plus.com, Richard Porter r...@minijem.plus.com wrote: On 2 Oct 2012 Steve Joyce wrote: Tried just a few websites. Looks ok on Demon and Amazon. Amazon site appears to work ok. However, streetmap.co.uk produced all the furniture but no map. None of the controls appear to do anything. Accepts postcode entry but does not produce map. I always use oldmap.srf Is that part of a URL? Can you clarify please. I tried www.oldmap.srf got a Could not resolve host message. No, I'm talking about streetmap.co.uk. You can still use the old format page layout. I have a form on my local home page like this (I've taken out the formatting): form action=http://www.streetmap.co.uk/oldsearch.srf?; name=f method=post input type=hidden value=oldmap name=mapp input type=hidden value=oldsearch name=searchp input type=text size=36 name=name input id=Submit1 type=submit value=Streetmap NAME=Submit1 input id=Radio2 type=radio CHECKED value=PostCode name=typePost Code input id=Radio3 type=radio value=PlaceName name=typeGB Place input id=Radio1 type=radio value=UKStreet name=typeUK Street input id=Radio8 type=radio value=LondonStreet name=typeLondon Street input id=Radio4 type=radio value=OSGrid name=typeOS grid (x,y) input id=Radio5 type=radio value=LRGrid name=typeLandranger input id=Radio6 type=radio value=LatLong name=typeLat/Long input id=Radio7 type=radio value=Telephone name=typeTel Code /form Clearly the search goes to oldsearch.srf but the map comes back as oldmap.srf with a few arguments. Sorry if this is getting off-topic. -- Richard Porterhttp://www.minijem.plus.com/ mailto:r...@minijem.plus.com I don't want a user experience - I just want stuff that works.
Re: User feedback requested
On 2 Oct 2012 Gavin Wraith ga...@wra1th.plus.com wrote: Platform: RISC OS using netsurf-2012-10-02_09-33-37/zip RO 5.18 on Iyonix Fault: NetSurf has to quit after rendering http://www.independent.co.uk/ Same here, ARMini, RISC OS 5.19 (16 May 2012). With best wishes, Peter. -- Peter \ / zfc Ta \ Prestbury, Cheltenham, Glos. GL52 and \/ ____ \ England. family / / \ | | |\ | / _ \ http://pnyoung.orpheusweb.co.uk / \__/ \_/ | \| \__/ \__ pnyo...@ormail.co.uk
Re: User feedback requested (esp. RISC OS)
In article 20121002090730.gd4...@pepperfish.net, Rob Kendrick r...@netsurf-browser.org wrote: I think we're in the best position to judge how much work it is and when we should spend our copious free time on doing it. I'm talking about altering the readme file to reflect what is in the zip file and not complaining about faults in the program. -- David Wild using RISC OS on broadband www.davidhwild.me.uk
Re: User feedback requested (esp. RISC OS)
On 2 Oct 2012 David H Wild wrote: In article 20121002090730.gd4...@pepperfish.net, Rob Kendrick r...@netsurf-browser.org wrote: I think we're in the best position to judge how much work it is and when we should spend our copious free time on doing it. I'm talking about altering the readme file to reflect what is in the zip file and not complaining about faults in the program. I'm grateful to have the latest test versions. I'm not worried about the ReadMe file or the System and Boot files unless they change. In fact the additional resources could usefully be a separate download. -- Richard Porterhttp://www.minijem.plus.com/ mailto:r...@minijem.plus.com I don't want a user experience - I just want stuff that works.
Re: User feedback requested
On 2 Oct 2012 Peter Young wrote: On 2 Oct 2012 Gavin Wraith ga...@wra1th.plus.com wrote: Platform: RISC OS using netsurf-2012-10-02_09-33-37/zip RO 5.18 on Iyonix Fault: NetSurf has to quit after rendering http://www.independent.co.uk/ Same here, ARMini, RISC OS 5.19 (16 May 2012). Same with RiscPC Kinetic 300, OS 6.16 (Segfault at 200118b0) I've saved the log file but I assume one of you will have submitted a bug report. -- Richard Porterhttp://www.minijem.plus.com/ mailto:r...@minijem.plus.com I don't want a user experience - I just want stuff that works.
Re: User feedback requested
I fixed one double free bug that was showing up when this page was run on gtk frontend but it may be unrelated, can you try the latest build to be see? -- Regards Vincent http://www.kyllikki.org/
Re: User feedback requested (esp. RISC OS)
On Mon, Oct 01, 2012 at 08:15:00PM +0100, David H Wild wrote: In article nsc41be8d752.b...@yo.rk, Bryn Evans nets...@bryork.freeuk.com wrote: Tried the second Sept 30th release and seems ok - RiscPC, StrongArm, RO4·02, 130Mb memory. In my case using RO 6.20. I have had no crashes but there is a silly with Flickr which doesn't produce the individual images - although it does show the images on the index page. With the March version I could see the pictures but there was a message telling me to use Javascript for the best results. This message has now disappeared, but I'd rather have the pictures. The readme file needs replacing, as it applies to the older system and tells you how to install the boot and system files which are not supplied with the new version. Although this message is a reply to Mr Wild *everyone* should read it and understand what I am saying. I will endeavour to be as clear as I can be. If that comes across as overly abrupt I apologise but before any additional misunderstanding occurs I wish to make these points clear. * The Continuous Integration (CI) builds are produced for the NetSurf Developers. * We have chosen to make them publicly available *only* as a courtesy to our users. * The prominent and clear warning in the big orange box [1] is there for a reason, please read what it says. If you disagree its not open for discussion, simply do not use the builds! * The CI builds are *NOT* in any way, whatsoever, at all (can I make this more emphatic?) to be considered a usable release or something stable. If a build happens to work and not explode you are fortunate. * We are happy to accept reports of issues on these builds as long as full and concise information is provided in the report. A patch to fix the problem is more than welcome (do discuss it with the developers first - we may have already fixed it). * Opinion on what steps we should or ought to take to resolve an issue is best kept to yourself, especially if you have not understood the above points. * If these simple guidelines are ignored or argued over we will have to reconsider the open access policy FOR CI BUILDS (before anyone misquotes me). In summary: These builds are a debugging tool for the NetSurf developers which you can choose to use if you wish, as long as you understand they are in no way a release. If you find a bug reporting it clearly and concisely is fine patches very welcome and opinion is not useful. In this case: A report that the additional resources mentioned in the readme were missing (which is now fixed BTW) would have been fine. The exact version used and other information would have been nice to have. That was where it should have been left and now I have clarified the purpose of these builds I assume that in future the issue will not arise again. [1] http://ci.netsurf-browser.org/builds/ -- Regards Vincent
Re: User feedback requested (esp. RISC OS)
In article 64f368d852.r...@user.minijem.plus.com, Richard Porter r...@minijem.plus.com wrote: On 2 Oct 2012 Chris Newman wrote: In article 1a4c5dd852.r...@user.minijem.plus.com, Richard Porter r...@minijem.plus.com wrote: On 2 Oct 2012 Steve Joyce wrote: Tried just a few websites. Looks ok on Demon and Amazon. Amazon site appears to work ok. However, streetmap.co.uk produced all the furniture but no map. None of the controls appear to do anything. Accepts postcode entry but does not produce map. I always use oldmap.srf Is that part of a URL? Can you clarify please. I tried www.oldmap.srf got a Could not resolve host message. No, I'm talking about streetmap.co.uk. You can still use the old format page layout. I have a form on my local home page like this (I've taken out the formatting): form action=http://www.streetmap.co.uk/oldsearch.srf?; That link worked fine for me (RiscPC 700 Adjust 4.39 with Unipod). I get to the old Streetmap.com page via... http://www.streetmap.co.uk/newdefaulte2.htm Cheers, -- Chris
Re: User feedback requested
In article 20121002174956.gb11...@kyllikki.org, Vincent Sanders vi...@netsurf-browser.org wrote: Although this message is a reply to Mr Wild *everyone* should read it and understand what I am saying. I will endeavour to be as clear as I can be. If that comes across as overly abrupt I apologise but before any additional misunderstanding occurs I wish to make these points clear. * The Continuous Integration (CI) builds are produced for the NetSurf Developers. big snip A report that the additional resources mentioned in the readme were missing (which is now fixed BTW) would have been fine. The exact version used and other information would have been nice to have. In the info window obtained from the iconbar icon, Version just gives 3.0 (development). Is there a way of checking which version/build you are using except noting at the time of downloading? Thanks for all your hard work. Regards, -- Chris
Re: User feedback requested (esp. RISC OS)
On 2 Oct 2012 Michael Drake t...@netsurf-browser.org wrote: In article 52d6e2c396t...@netsurf-browser.org, Michael Drake t...@netsurf-browser.org wrote: CAUTION: SAVE ALL WORK BEFORE RUNNING THESE BUILDS We have at least one case of NetSurf freezing a RISC OS Iyonix such that it needs to be reset. We think this problem may gave been fixed by updating the autobuilder to use the GCCSDK 4.1.2 v2 release. Please could people who had the RISC OS 5 freeze problem test the latest build from http://ci.netsurf-browser.org/builds/riscos/ ? Having fully understood Vincent's warning, which has just arrived here, I can report this: I've been running the version in netsurf-2012-10-02_13-35-15/zip for several hours now, and have used pretty much the full range of apps that I usually use, and haven't had a freeze yet. ARMini, RISC OS 5.19 (16 May 2012). I've kept a copy of the latest (I think) 2.9, but the new one looks good so far; many thanks for the work. With best wishes, Peter. -- Peter \ / zfc Ta \ Prestbury, Cheltenham, Glos. GL52 and \/ ____ \ England. family / / \ | | |\ | / _ \ http://pnyoung.orpheusweb.co.uk / \__/ \_/ | \| \__/ \__ pnyo...@ormail.co.uk
Re: User feedback requested
On 2 Oct 2012 Chris Newman cvj...@waitrose.com wrote: In article 20121002174956.gb11...@kyllikki.org, Vincent Sanders vi...@netsurf-browser.org wrote: Although this message is a reply to Mr Wild *everyone* should read it and understand what I am saying. I will endeavour to be as clear as I can be. If that comes across as overly abrupt I apologise but before any additional misunderstanding occurs I wish to make these points clear. * The Continuous Integration (CI) builds are produced for the NetSurf Developers. big snip A report that the additional resources mentioned in the readme were missing (which is now fixed BTW) would have been fine. The exact version used and other information would have been nice to have. In the info window obtained from the iconbar icon, Version just gives 3.0 (development). Is there a way of checking which version/build you are using except noting at the time of downloading? It's in the name of the zip file, I think. Thanks for all your hard work. Seconded. With best wishes, Peter. -- Peter \ / zfc Ta \ Prestbury, Cheltenham, Glos. GL52 and \/ ____ \ England. family / / \ | | |\ | / _ \ http://pnyoung.orpheusweb.co.uk / \__/ \_/ | \| \__/ \__ pnyo...@ormail.co.uk
Re: User feedback requested
In article 52d877edfdcvj...@waitrose.com, Chris Newman cvj...@waitrose.com wrote: In the info window obtained from the iconbar icon, Version just gives 3.0 (development). Is there a way of checking which version/build you are using except noting at the time of downloading? There is just the name of the zip file you downloaded to identify it at the moment. This is just one reason we aren't yet ready to announce development builds being available for general testing use; there's currently no good way to identify them. We need to come up with a new identification scheme, since Subversion revision numbers are no longer available. -- Michael Drake (tlsa) http://www.netsurf-browser.org/
Re: User feedback requested (esp. RISC OS)
In article 016d78d852.pnyo...@pnyoung.ormail.co.uk, Peter Young pnyo...@ormail.co.uk wrote: On 2 Oct 2012 Michael Drake t...@netsurf-browser.org wrote: Please could people who had the RISC OS 5 freeze problem test the latest build from http://ci.netsurf-browser.org/builds/riscos/ ? I've been running the version in netsurf-2012-10-02_13-35-15/zip for several hours now, and have used pretty much the full range of apps that I usually use, and haven't had a freeze yet. ARMini, RISC OS 5.19 (16 May 2012). That's great, thanks for the feedback. -- Michael Drake (tlsa) http://www.netsurf-browser.org/
Re: User feedback requested (esp. RISC OS)
In message 52d845e915t...@netsurf-browser.org Michael Drake t...@netsurf-browser.org wrote: In article 52d6e2c396t...@netsurf-browser.org, Michael Drake t...@netsurf-browser.org wrote: CAUTION: SAVE ALL WORK BEFORE RUNNING THESE BUILDS We have at least one case of NetSurf freezing a RISC OS Iyonix such that it needs to be reset. We think this problem may gave been fixed by updating the autobuilder to use the GCCSDK 4.1.2 v2 release. Please could people who had the RISC OS 5 freeze problem test the latest build from http://ci.netsurf-browser.org/builds/riscos/ ? I gave 2012-10-02_17-27-57 a good thrashing this evening. No freeze occurred. I'm going to stick with it for now. I welcome the CI builds. Iyonix, RO 5.18, 512 MiB. This is a good point at which to offer my thanks again to the whole NetSurf team! Dave Send any screenshot to your friends in seconds... Works in all emails, instant messengers, blogs, forums and social networks. TRY IM TOOLPACK at http://www.imtoolpack.com/default.aspx?rc=if2 for FREE
Re: User feedback requested (esp. RISC OS)
In message 52d84f6370st...@joyces.demon.co.uk Steve Joyce st...@joyces.demon.co.uk wrote: RISC OS 4.39 RPC Strongarm Using Netsurf-2012-09-30_10-23-17/zip Tried just a few websites. Looks ok on Demon and Amazon. Amazon site appears to work ok. However, streetmap.co.uk produced all the furniture but no map. None of the controls appear to do anything. Accepts postcode entry but does not produce map. I've got apparently full functionality from http://www.streetmap.co.uk/newdefaulte2.htm Dave Share photos screenshots in seconds... TRY FREE IM TOOLPACK at http://www.imtoolpack.com/default.aspx?rc=if1 Works in all emails, instant messengers, blogs, forums and social networks.
Re: User feedback requested
netsurf-2012-10-02_20-23-02/zip now working OK with http://www.independent.co.uk/ . -- Gavin Wraith (ga...@wra1th.plus.com) Home page: http://www.wra1th.plus.com/
