2 sites that don't!

2016-01-26 Thread Richard Torrens (lists)
http://www.catbehaviourist.com/sure-feed-microchip-pet-feeder-review/ http://www.zooplus.co.uk/shop/cats/cat_bowls_feeders/feeders/programmable/479534?gclid=CImfsqu3x8oCFUORGwodHCUFYQ Both display very badly. First site all text is hidden. The source is very over-complicated, so I can't see why.

Re: Big push on testing needed

2016-01-26 Thread lists
In article <3bc72c4755.davem...@my.inbox.com>, Dave Higton wrote: > Please, everybody, download the latest test build (which will, > of course, change as bugs are found and fixed), give it a good > thrashing, and get your bug reports in. A site I use a lot is

Re: Latest builds missing.

2016-01-26 Thread Peter Young
On 26 Jan 2016 David Pitt wrote: > Currently the Changes page shows #3312 as the latest successful build but > the Downloads page only goes up to #3307 for all builds. > http://ci.netsurf-browser.org/jenkins/job/netsurf/changes >

Re: Latest builds missing.

2016-01-26 Thread Michael Drake
On 26/01/16 07:49, David Pitt wrote: Currently the Changes page shows #3312 as the latest successful build but the Downloads page only goes up to #3307 for all builds. The downloads are still there, but "json" has been removed from the filenames.

Re: Latest builds missing.

2016-01-26 Thread David Pitt
Michael Drake, on 26 Jan, wrote: > > > On 26/01/16 07:49, David Pitt wrote: > > Currently the Changes page shows #3312 as the latest successful build > > but the Downloads page only goes up to #3307 for all builds. > > The downloads are still there, but "json" has been removed from the >

Re: 2 sites that don't!

2016-01-26 Thread Richard Torrens (lists)
In article , Grahame Parish wrote: > Not related to the problem with the sites, but I confirm that the > feeders work very well. We have several cats with different dietary > requirements. Thanks - but any other

Re: 2 sites that don't!

2016-01-26 Thread Richard Torrens (lists)
In article <145dff4755.ga...@wra1th.plus.com>, Gavin Wraith wrote: > I have a useful little Lua script, called noscript, for use with > StrongED that strips out all the stuff between matching > and tags. Here it is: Useful: I have on occasion loked for the tags and

Re: 2 sites that don't!

2016-01-26 Thread Jim Nagel
Gavin Wraith wrote on 26 Jan: > Using it on the text of the first webpage produces source for a leaner > webpage that reveals the hidden text. Here is the procedure: > 1. Page->View Source in NetSurf > 2. Save to some scrap directory. > 3. Shift-click to load into StrongED > 4. Shift-Drag

Filtering webpages

2016-01-26 Thread Gavin Wraith
It is some years ago that Fred Graute added scriptability to StrongED, using the 'apply' icon. It enables one to alter what is displayed in a StrongED window by dragging a script to that icon. There are often occasions when one would like to massage webpages displayed in a browser. At present one

Re: 2 sites that don't!

2016-01-26 Thread cj
In article <09d3064855@abbeypress.net>, Jim Nagel wrote: > Have often wished for a similar thing to override bothersome CSS, > particularly CSS that specifies tiny grey text (which seems to be a > current fashion among some designers with younger eyes than

Re: Filtering webpages

2016-01-26 Thread Richard Torrens (lists)
In article , Gavin Wraith wrote: > So many web pages these days are crammed with stuff put in by > advertisers or third parties which upset the viewing experience, > or which NetSurf is unable to render properly. The individual > user

Re: 2 sites that don't!

2016-01-26 Thread Gavin Wraith
In message <09d3064855@abbeypress.net> Jim Nagel wrote: >Did that on the first web page. Got a security warning from StrongEd >about "process"; I said "allow always". >Then "File name '.in' not recognised". Sounds like !StrongED$ScrapDir has not been

Re: Filtering webpages

2016-01-26 Thread Gavin Wraith
In message <55480e2bfeli...@torrens.org.uk> "Richard Torrens (lists)" wrote: >NS has choices: >Hide advertisements >Disable pop-up windows >Disable JavaScript > >These, I would guess, tell it to ignore such content. It is then filtering >exactly as you seem to

/ Archive 23:12 white-on-grey

2016-01-26 Thread Jim Nagel
cj wrote on 26 Jan: > ... and what about the latest issue of Archive where, on page 3 you > have white text on a light grey background??? Yes; that was bad. The contrast looked fine in the past, and looked fine this time too on screen, but unfortunately my printshop used a new printer.

Re: NetSurf progress

2016-01-26 Thread lists
In article <41035cf02c7.007bd...@davehigton.me.uk>, Dave Higton wrote: > NetSurf is fully capable of creating bug reports using the Mantis > issue tracker, including attaching files and adding notes. If > you have a problem, ask on this list for help. This morning

Re: JavaScript enabled builds for Atari

2016-01-26 Thread Ole Loots
Hello, enabling JS for the atari builds was great :-) Attached is a screenshot of another testpage from the NetSurf JS Testsuite. Things like works fine. document.getElementById() works, also document.write() works, at least when called during the rendering phase. The JS Prime-Test page

Re: Filtering webpages

2016-01-26 Thread lists
In article <4ee4134855.ga...@wra1th.plus.com>, Gavin Wraith wrote: > I seem to remember using a browser on an Acorn machine, many years ago, > that gave you the option of not displaying images unless you > specifically clicked on the icon that the browser used to

Re: Big push on testing needed

2016-01-26 Thread Dave Higton
In message <57e4a64755.iyoj...@rickman.argonet.co.uk> John Rickman Iyonix wrote: >As far as I know javascript should ignore html comments and the >javascript validator does not flag them as errors > > http://www.javascriptlint.com/online_lint.php My reference

Re: Big push on testing needed

2016-01-26 Thread Dave Higton
In message <5547e95991stuartli...@orpheusinternet.co.uk> lists wrote: >In article <3bc72c4755.davem...@my.inbox.com>, > Dave Higton wrote: >> Please, everybody, download the latest test build (which will, >> of course, change

Re: Big push on testing needed

2016-01-26 Thread lists
In article , Dave Higton wrote: > Please raise an issue on Mantis. At around 10 this morning, I went to the bug-tracker site and went through the process of creating a login - user name, email, catchpa - all went ok but I'm still

Re: Big push on testing needed

2016-01-26 Thread John Rickman Iyonix
Dave Higton wrote > In message <57e4a64755.iyoj...@rickman.argonet.co.uk> > John Rickman Iyonix wrote: >>As far as I know javascript should ignore html comments and the >>javascript validator does not flag them as errors >> >>

Re: Big push on testing needed

2016-01-26 Thread Chris Young
On 26 January 2016 23:58:51 GMT+00:00, John Rickman Iyonix wrote: >Dave Higton wrote > >> In message <57e4a64755.iyoj...@rickman.argonet.co.uk> >> John Rickman Iyonix wrote: > >>>As far as I know javascript should ignore html comments and

Re: 2 sites that don't!

2016-01-26 Thread Grahame Parish
In message <5547fb845eli...@torrens.org.uk> "Richard Torrens (lists)" wrote: > http://www.catbehaviourist.com/sure-feed-microchip-pet-feeder-review/ > http://www.zooplus.co.uk/shop/cats/cat_bowls_feeders/feeders/programma >

Re: 2 sites that don't!

2016-01-26 Thread Gavin Wraith
In message <5547fb845eli...@torrens.org.uk> "Richard Torrens (lists)" wrote: >http://www.catbehaviourist.com/sure-feed-microchip-pet-feeder-review/ > >http://www.zooplus.co.uk/shop/cats/cat_bowls_feeders/feeders/programmable/479534?gclid=CImfsqu3x8oCFUORGwodHCUFYQ