Re: !Cache

2016-09-09 Thread John Williams
In article <55bcf7a3bdnets...@avisoft.f9.co.uk>, Martin Avison wrote: > 3.5 (6th April 1016) So before the Norman Conquest, then? -- | John Williams | joh...@ukgateway.net Names for Soul Band:- Soul Doubt *

Re: !Cache

2016-09-09 Thread Martin Avison
In article <20160909125304.gn3...@platypus.pepperfish.net>, Rob Kendrick wrote: > On Fri, Sep 09, 2016 at 01:37:42PM +0100, Richard Torrens (lists) wrote: > > But I have replaced !Cache.Caches.Default.Netsurf with a zip archive > > called Netsurf. This appeasrs to

Re: !Cache

2016-09-09 Thread Rob Kendrick
On Fri, Sep 09, 2016 at 01:37:42PM +0100, Richard Torrens (lists) wrote: > But I have replaced !Cache.Caches.Default.Netsurf with a zip archive > called Netsurf. This appeasrs to work fine, currently it's 492K - with 75 > directories in it. Replacing the directory with an image filing system

Re: !Cache

2016-09-09 Thread Richard Torrens (lists)
In article <55bcdc22b0nets...@avisoft.f9.co.uk>, Martin Avison wrote: > How does !Cache take account of NS choices? Disc cache is set to 1024MB. > > What are the disadvantages of using a zip fine for Netsurf in !Cache. > > This is on ARMX6. I'm aware that the lfau

Re: !Cache

2016-09-09 Thread Martin Avison
In article <55bc5e48e6li...@torrens.org.uk>, Richard Torrens (lists) wrote: > My SSD (250GB nominal) was running out - only about 6BG free. > So I deleted !Cache's Netsurf directory. Now 157GB. > Two questions: > How does !Cache take account of NS choices? Disc cache