Re: [PATCH] dnsmasq: does handle more than one nameserver per domain

2013-07-09 Thread Pavel Simerda
- Original Message - From: Jack Bates u32...@nottheoilrig.com To: networkmanager-list@gnome.org Sent: Friday, July 5, 2013 12:20:06 AM Subject: [PATCH] dnsmasq: does handle more than one nameserver per domain http://nottheoilrig.com/networkmanager/201307040/perdomain.patch Hi, +1

Re: discuss: NM server defaults

2013-07-09 Thread Pavel Simerda
From: Dan Winship d...@gnome.org On 07/01/2013 04:14 PM, Dan Winship wrote: danw, any rationale behind the argument for ignore-carrier? Servers, by definition, tend to have fixed IP addresses. Therefore, if you are using DHCP on a server, it's probably for ease of deployment, not

Re: How frequently org.freedektop.ModemManager.Modem.Cdma.SignalQuality signals signal strength?

2013-07-09 Thread satya gowtham kudupudi
hi, this is what i've done... 1. i found 3 endpoints on interface 0. 2. # echo 1-1.2:1.0 /sys/bus/usbl/drivers/option/unbind 3. # modprobe qmi_wwan 4. echo 19d2 fff1 /sys/bus/usb/drivers/qmi_wwan/new_id 5. installed libqmi-utils i didnt find /dev/cdc-wdmX device ! what should i do now?

Re: discuss: NM server defaults

2013-07-09 Thread Colin Walters
On Mon, 2013-07-08 at 12:47 -0400, Dan Winship wrote: On 07/01/2013 04:14 PM, Dan Winship wrote: danw, any rationale behind the argument for ignore-carrier? Servers, by definition, tend to have fixed IP addresses. Therefore, if you are using DHCP on a server, it's probably for ease of

Network manager dbus interface

2013-07-09 Thread Fotis P
Hello everyone, This is a really nooby question but I cannot figure out how to get the Network Manager dbus Interface other than the basic org.freedesktop.NetworkManager. I get this by calling the CreateInterface utility. But what about the rest of the interfaces like

Re: [PATCH] dnsmasq: does handle more than one nameserver per domain

2013-07-09 Thread Jack Bates
On 09/07/13 01:50 AM, Pavel Simerda wrote: Hi, +1 from me with a couple of minor issues: Thank you Pavel, I attempted to address the issues: * Name *i* is good enough for an integer counter. There are already some loops using *i* and if I'm not mistaken, they would conflict. The patch

Re: [PATCH] dnsmasq: does handle more than one nameserver per domain

2013-07-09 Thread Pavel Simerda
From: Jack Bates u32...@nottheoilrig.com On 09/07/13 01:50 AM, Pavel Simerda wrote: Hi, +1 from me with a couple of minor issues: Thank you Pavel, I attempted to address the issues: * Name *i* is good enough for an integer counter. There are already some loops using *i* and if