On Mon, 2015-07-27 at 22:22 +0200, Jean-Christian de Rivaz wrote:
> Le 27. 07. 15 19:32, Dan Williams a écrit :
> > On Mon, 2015-07-27 at 19:24 +0200, Jean-Christian de Rivaz wrote:
> >> Le 27. 07. 15 16:36, Dan Williams a écrit :
> >>> On Mon, 2015-07-27 at 13:30 +0200, Jean-Christian de Rivaz wro
Le 27. 07. 15 19:32, Dan Williams a écrit :
On Mon, 2015-07-27 at 19:24 +0200, Jean-Christian de Rivaz wrote:
Le 27. 07. 15 16:36, Dan Williams a écrit :
On Mon, 2015-07-27 at 13:30 +0200, Jean-Christian de Rivaz wrote:
In this observation NetworkManager still think that eth0 is disconnected
w
On Mon, 2015-07-27 at 19:24 +0200, Jean-Christian de Rivaz wrote:
> Le 27. 07. 15 16:36, Dan Williams a écrit :
> > On Mon, 2015-07-27 at 13:30 +0200, Jean-Christian de Rivaz wrote:
> >> In this observation NetworkManager still think that eth0 is disconnected
> >> while he correctly logged the mess
Le 27. 07. 15 16:36, Dan Williams a écrit :
On Mon, 2015-07-27 at 13:30 +0200, Jean-Christian de Rivaz wrote:
In this observation NetworkManager still think that eth0 is disconnected
while he correctly logged the message 'link connected':
Just to make sure, the ethernet connection being used is
On Mon, 2015-07-27 at 13:30 +0200, Jean-Christian de Rivaz wrote:
> In this observation NetworkManager still think that eth0 is disconnected
> while he correctly logged the message 'link connected':
Just to make sure, the ethernet connection being used is
autoconnect=true, right?
nmcli con show
In this observation NetworkManager still think that eth0 is disconnected
while he correctly logged the message 'link connected':
Jul 27 07:46:24 x NetworkManager[2184]: Activation (ppp0)
successful, device activated.
Jul 27 08:20:09 x NetworkManager[2184]: (eth0): link disconnected
(deferrin
* Aleksander Morgado
> Having a single APN entry for provider in the serviceproviders.xml
> doesn't guarantee that that APN is the one the user needs to use... it
> may very well be; but if it isn't because the DB is not up to date,
> the user may be incurring in unexpected expenses...
Are there
> I, on the other hand, just want to be on-line whenever I can, so I
> simply use autoconnect=true for all available connections. Now I just
> need Aleksander to figure out what's going on in fdo#90973 and
> everything'll be just peachy. :-)
Speaking of which, I just got hit by a related issue in
On Wed, Jul 22, 2015 at 8:10 PM, Bastien Nocera wrote:
>> > While WiFi at least imply that the user select an SSID, there
>> > exists SIM
>> > cards that are delivered configured to not require a PIN code or a
>> > APN
>> > password from the user.
>>
>> This reminded me of something I've been wond
