2010/1/11 José Queiroz zekk...@gmail.com:
Hi Daniel,
NM needs a lot of fixes and improvements, but I think that in this
case, it is completely innocent.
Your dhcp server is too lazy, as you can see: it only answered for the
initial DHCPDISCOVER on the third attempt, the same for the other
On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 10:02 PM, Dan Williams d...@redhat.com wrote:
On Mon, 2009-11-16 at 11:42 +0200, Graham Beneke wrote:
Does anyone have any thoughts or comments on building IPv6 transition
functionality into NM ?
So the first steps are to figure out what settings are actually needed
Forgot to hit reply all, sorry.
-- Forwarded message --
From: Benoit Boissinot bboissin+networkmana...@gmail.com
Date: Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 1:17 AM
Subject: Re: Internet connection sharing
To: Dan Williams d...@redhat.com
On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 10:56 PM, Dan Williams d
On Fri, Nov 13, 2009 at 12:28 AM, Fernando Pereira ferdonl...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks for the reply.
Hum... if it does NAT then how can users know about that? But actually, many
times I want to share the internet I get via wireless to my wired
connection. It acts the same way?
Yes you can
On Mon, Nov 02, 2009 at 01:34:14PM -0800, Dan Williams wrote:
On Mon, 2009-11-02 at 22:18 +0100, Benoit Boissinot wrote:
Yes, so I guess I should get the gateway by iterating the NMIP4Address's
from the config, and pick the first one with a gateway?
If you have the NMVPNConnection
On Mon, Nov 02, 2009 at 01:02:38PM -0800, Dan Williams wrote:
On Fri, 2009-10-30 at 17:58 +0100, Benoit Boissinot wrote:
Hi list,
I have a small feature request regarding the custom routing option.
Currently you can easily direct direct a subnetwork to a connection
(the use
Hi list,
First thanks for network-manager, I've been using it for a long time
and just began to use it's openvpn plugin, it's really nice!
I have a small feature request regarding the custom routing option.
Currently you can easily direct direct a subnetwork to a connection
(the use this
On Thu, May 29, 2008 at 1:15 AM, Michael Biebl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dan Williams schrieb:
On Fri, 2008-05-23 at 15:16 +0200, Michael Biebl wrote:
Hi,
after todays merges of Benoit's patches to use libnl directly instead of
ip, I was wondering why
move nm_system_device_flush_ip4_routes to a generic implementation
with libnl.
diff -r 119c572e331e src/NetworkManagerSystem.c
--- a/src/NetworkManagerSystem.cFri Apr 25 22:36:49 2008 +0200
+++ b/src/NetworkManagerSystem.cFri Apr 25 22:42:50 2008 +0200
@@ -559,3 +559,77 @@
nm_system_device_has_active_routes, nm_system_flush_loopback_routes,
nm_system_flush_arp_cache and nm_system_device_update_resolv_conf are
currently unused, kill them.
diff -r 42e27e385d32 src/NetworkManagerSystem.h
--- a/src/NetworkManagerSystem.hFri Apr 25 22:43:26 2008 +0200
+++
nm_generic_enable_loopback: use a libnl implementation instead of
iproute.
this was the last place which was calling /sbin/ip, it can probably be
removed from configure.in and the initscripts (if no plugin depends on
it).
diff -r 4e06865d776a src/backends/NetworkManagerGeneric.c
---
On Fri, Apr 25, 2008 at 12:07 PM, Simon Geard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 2008-04-24 at 09:22 -0500, Aaron Konstam wrote:
On Thu, 2008-04-24 at 11:45 +, Nick Byrne wrote:
Hi list,
I would like configure NM so that ignores my ethernet
interfaces, is this possible?
On Wed, Apr 23, 2008 at 12:23:45PM -0400, Dan Williams wrote:
On Fri, 2008-04-18 at 20:12 -0400, Benoit Boissinot wrote:
(depends on the cleanup of the frugalware backend)
Remove nm_system_device_replace_default_ip4_route from all
backends, implement it with libnl.
So this patch
On Wed, Apr 23, 2008 at 01:55:00PM -0400, Dan Williams wrote:
On Wed, 2008-04-23 at 19:26 +0200, Benoit Boissinot wrote:
On Wed, Apr 23, 2008 at 07:01:14PM +0200, Benoit Boissinot wrote:
On Wed, Apr 23, 2008 at 12:23:45PM -0400, Dan Williams wrote:
probably need to poke Thomas about
(resend)
(depends on the cleanup of the frugalware backend)
Remove nm_system_device_replace_default_ip4_route from all
backends, implement it with libnl.
diff -r 44a2c48934ef src/NetworkManagerPolicy.c
--- a/src/NetworkManagerPolicy.cWed Apr 16 00:35:47 2008 -0400
+++
(depends on the cleanup of the frugalware backend)
Remove nm_system_device_add_ip4_route_via_device_with_iface from all
backends, implement it with libnl.
Removes validate_ip4_route since we don't call system anymore
diff -r 630520f22ebb src/NetworkManagerSystem.c
---
(depends on the cleanup of the frugalware backend)
Remove nm_system_device_replace_default_ip4_route from all
backends, implement it with libnl.
diff -r 44a2c48934ef src/NetworkManagerPolicy.c
--- a/src/NetworkManagerPolicy.cWed Apr 16 00:35:47 2008 -0400
+++ b/src/NetworkManagerPolicy.c
Removes the AF_INET implementation of nm_system_device_set_ip4_route,
reimplement it with libnl.
The fifth argument is now the prefixlen, and no longer the netmask (it
was always called with 255.255.255.255)
diff -r a8b0359dcc78 src/NetworkManagerSystem.c
--- a/src/NetworkManagerSystem.c
While converting stuff to libnl, I've noticed that
nm_system_flush_arp_cache() is currently unused.
Should it be removed ?
regards,
Benoit
--
:wq
___
NetworkManager-list mailing list
NetworkManager-list@gnome.org
I'm not using Frugalware, but it calls /usr/sbin/ip directly to do the
same stuff as the generic backend, this patch move the Frugalware
backend closer to the generic implementation.
regards,
Benoit
diff -r 433564361ff1 src/backends/NetworkManagerFrugalware.c
---
) ?
=
# User Benoit Boissinot [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Only flush ipv4 routes and ipv4 addresses
diff -r 57f0b818c7bd -r 664781c94bdf src/NetworkManagerSystem.c
--- a/src/NetworkManagerSystem.cSat Apr 12 22:34:50 2008 -0400
+++ b/src/NetworkManagerSystem.cSat Apr 12 22:40:46 2008 -0400
On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 11:12:53AM -0400, Dan Williams wrote:
On Thu, 2008-03-13 at 23:49 +0100, Benoit Boissinot wrote:
I'd like to know what work is needed to get some IPv6 support in
NetworkManager.
My ISP has IPv6 support, it works like this:
IP address configuration and routing
On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 06:50:37PM +0100, Sjoerd Simons wrote:
On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 01:41:44PM -0400, Dan Williams wrote:
Or maybe the kernel does it automagically now for some reason if you poke
something in sysfs?
I've been using ipv6 since 2001 and the kernel has always done things
On Tue, Mar 11, 2008 at 2:08 PM, Dan Williams [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
0.6.x also combines APs with the same SSID in the UI. 0.7 splits them
out at the NetworkManager layer, while the applet combines APs that are
similar based on more than just SSID (SSID, security settings, band,
don't have the environment to test yet).
thanks,
Benoit Boissinot
Index: src/nm-netlink.c
===
--- src/nm-netlink.c(revision 3375)
+++ src/nm-netlink.c(working copy)
@@ -71,20 +71,8 @@
}
if (nl_connect
25 matches
Mail list logo
