On Tue, 2008-09-30 at 16:27 -0400, Andrew wrote:
On Tue, 2008-09-30 at 15:18 -0400, Andrew wrote:
On Tue, 2008-09-30 at 12:22 -0400, Andrew wrote:
On Tue, 2008-09-30 at 06:30 -0400, Andrew wrote:
On Mon, 2008-09-29 at 18:44 -0400, Andrew wrote:
On Sun, 2008-09-28 at 19:21 -0400,
However, could you please provide a quick hack to meet my rare need, to keep
my wifi class always enabled, regardless of what the BIOS is reporting? It
would be confined to my system strictly.
You could simply not schedule killswitch checks by commenting this code
in src/nm-hal-manager.c out:
this time. It's a policy decision; I made the decision to keep things
simple and direct and interpret the user's intent as disabling wireless
when the rfkill switch is turned on.
Dan,
even if I were some sort of C and networking guru and veteran member of your
development team, still i would
On Tue, 2008-09-30 at 06:30 -0400, Andrew wrote:
On Mon, 2008-09-29 at 18:44 -0400, Andrew wrote:
On Sun, 2008-09-28 at 19:21 -0400, Andrew wrote:
Hello,
I have appealed to the Fedora Forum, but no one seems to have a clue
there.
Here is the thread:
On Tue, 2008-09-30 at 06:30 -0400, Andrew wrote:
On Mon, 2008-09-29 at 18:44 -0400, Andrew wrote:
On Sun, 2008-09-28 at 19:21 -0400, Andrew wrote:
Hello,
I have appealed to the Fedora Forum, but no one seems to have a clue
there.
Here is the thread:
On Tue, 2008-09-30 at 12:22 -0400, Andrew wrote:
On Tue, 2008-09-30 at 06:30 -0400, Andrew wrote:
On Mon, 2008-09-29 at 18:44 -0400, Andrew wrote:
On Sun, 2008-09-28 at 19:21 -0400, Andrew wrote:
Hello,
I have appealed to the Fedora Forum, but no one seems to have a
clue
On Tue, 2008-09-30 at 15:18 -0400, Andrew wrote:
On Tue, 2008-09-30 at 12:22 -0400, Andrew wrote:
On Tue, 2008-09-30 at 06:30 -0400, Andrew wrote:
On Mon, 2008-09-29 at 18:44 -0400, Andrew wrote:
On Sun, 2008-09-28 at 19:21 -0400, Andrew wrote:
Hello,
I have appealed to
On Tue, 2008-09-30 at 15:18 -0400, Andrew wrote:
On Tue, 2008-09-30 at 12:22 -0400, Andrew wrote:
On Tue, 2008-09-30 at 06:30 -0400, Andrew wrote:
On Mon, 2008-09-29 at 18:44 -0400, Andrew wrote:
On Sun, 2008-09-28 at 19:21 -0400, Andrew wrote:
Hello,
I have appealed to
On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 10:27 PM, Andrew [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
(I say this in response to your mentioning upstream -- a word i've not
heard before but assume has something to do with committing code changes for
general use)
This concept basically refers to the water flowing. Upstream is
On Sun, 2008-09-28 at 19:21 -0400, Andrew wrote:
Hello,
I have appealed to the Fedora Forum, but no one seems to have a clue there.
Here is the thread:
http://forums.fedoraforum.org/showthread.php?t=199562
(A quick synopsis of the thread:
I've activated/deactivated everything i
On Sun, 2008-09-28 at 19:21 -0400, Andrew wrote:
Hello,
I have appealed to the Fedora Forum, but no one seems to have a clue there.
Here is the thread:
http://forums.fedoraforum.org/showthread.php?t=199562
(A quick synopsis of the thread:
I've activated/deactivated everything i
On Sun, 2008-09-28 at 19:21 -0400, Andrew wrote:
Hello,
I have appealed to the Fedora Forum, but no one seems to have a clue
there.
Here is the thread:
http://forums.fedoraforum.org/showthread.php?t=199562
(A quick synopsis of the thread:
I've activated/deactivated everything i
On Mon, 2008-09-29 at 18:40 -0400, Andrew wrote:
On Sun, 2008-09-28 at 19:21 -0400, Andrew wrote:
Hello,
I have appealed to the Fedora Forum, but no one seems to have a clue there.
Here is the thread:
http://forums.fedoraforum.org/showthread.php?t=199562
(A quick synopsis of
On Mon, 2008-09-29 at 18:44 -0400, Andrew wrote:
On Sun, 2008-09-28 at 19:21 -0400, Andrew wrote:
Hello,
I have appealed to the Fedora Forum, but no one seems to have a clue
there.
Here is the thread:
http://forums.fedoraforum.org/showthread.php?t=199562
(A quick synopsis of
14 matches
Mail list logo
