How to find out if my WLAN uses WPA or WPA2 security?

2013-06-19 Thread Paul Menzel
Dear NetworkManager folks, following a discussion on the linux-wireless list [1], I want to find out if my WLAN uses WPA(1) or WPA2 security. In his reply Larry Finger suggests to use `iwlist scan` but I do want to avoid installing the package containing this and wonder if NetworkManager exposes

nmcli: »WE« instead of »WEP« shown In German output

2013-06-19 Thread Paul Menzel
Dear NetworkManager folks, while playing with nmcli $ LANG=C nmcli --version nmcli tool, version 0.9.4.0 I noticed, that »WE« instead of »WEP« is displayed. $ nmcli dev wifi list SSID BSSID MODUS FREQUENZ

Re: [PATCH] nm-device: Remove bogus warning

2013-06-19 Thread Paul Menzel
Dear Colin, thank you for the patch! Am Dienstag, den 18.06.2013, 16:47 -0400 schrieb Colin Walters: This code was broken when it landed with commit fcc441622ae2632b9b36f352621cfd3baf34dc85 ; it was then later updated with 2318b3c5252403a52973eae70c32ff715c7994e7 Hmm, I am not good at

Re: [PATCH] nm-device: Remove bogus warning

2013-06-19 Thread Dan Williams
On Tue, 2013-06-18 at 16:47 -0400, Colin Walters wrote: This code was broken when it landed with commit fcc441622ae2632b9b36f352621cfd3baf34dc85 ; it was then later updated with 2318b3c5252403a52973eae70c32ff715c7994e7 But the assertion is just clearly wrong - if we're going to clear the

Re: How to find out if my WLAN uses WPA or WPA2 security?

2013-06-19 Thread Dan Williams
On Wed, 2013-06-19 at 09:37 +0200, Paul Menzel wrote: Dear NetworkManager folks, following a discussion on the linux-wireless list [1], I want to find out if my WLAN uses WPA(1) or WPA2 security. In his reply Larry Finger suggests to use `iwlist scan` but I do want to avoid installing the

Re: [PATCH] nm-device: Remove bogus warning

2013-06-19 Thread Colin Walters
On Wed, 2013-06-19 at 08:11 -0500, Dan Williams wrote: It's more there because it's potentially a bug Ok, the logic seems odd because we're doing effectively: if (condition) { if (condition) warning (); deal_with_it (); } If the code had looked like: if (condition) {

Re: [PATCH] nm-device: Remove bogus warning

2013-06-19 Thread Colin Walters
Ok, how about this patch? From ab22ffd804ba7e91bd6d064cbf5627ab03981c3b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Colin Walters walt...@verbum.org Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2013 14:56:26 -0400 Subject: [PATCH] device: Queuing two transitions to the same state is not an error Just ignore this, since it happens in

Re: [PATCH] nm-device: Remove bogus warning

2013-06-19 Thread Dan Williams
On Wed, 2013-06-19 at 16:01 -0400, Colin Walters wrote: Ok, how about this patch? Yeah, that's better. Dan ___ networkmanager-list mailing list networkmanager-list@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/networkmanager-list

Re: [PATCH] nm-device: Remove bogus warning

2013-06-19 Thread Dan Williams
On Wed, 2013-06-19 at 18:05 -0500, Dan Williams wrote: On Wed, 2013-06-19 at 16:01 -0400, Colin Walters wrote: Ok, how about this patch? Yeah, that's better. Pushed, thanks. Dan ___ networkmanager-list mailing list networkmanager-list@gnome.org