Hi,
> Had to make some cosmetic patches to get it to compile with gcc4 and I
> am sure they are "wrong" but it compiled.
I think I fixed these issues in upstream CVS this morning.
___
NetworkManager-list mailing list
NetworkManager-list@gnome.org
http
Hi,
I am trying to use NetworkManager for NLD9 (~SuSE9.1). I
downloaded the sources from (http://people.redhat.com/dcbw/NetworkManager).
It says that NM is distribution and desktop agnostic, but I could not get to
compile the sources. When I ran “configure”
it says that SuSE is not yet
On Tue, 2005-03-15 at 11:54 -0500, Colin Walters wrote:
> > The problem here is that app status also depends on different subsystem
> > and external system status. In the other words, can I keep my TCP
> > connections after the reboot.
>
> No, but in laptop+suspend case TCP connections are often
On Tue, 2005-03-15 at 07:11 -0800, Tomislav Vujec wrote:
> No. What I care about is app & subsystem state. There are still a lot of
> applications that hold some kind of state, and don't require restart
> even if X and gdm are restarted. Any background applications (P2P file
> sharing, servers,
On Tue, 2005-03-15 at 08:01 -0500, Bill Rugolsky Jr. wrote:
> If it is some huge bloated behemoth that may die due to bugs,
Any software can crash due to bugs. The same is true for someone
writing some hypothetical D-BUS replacement on top of netlink or
whatever.
But you might notice that the
On Tue, 2005-03-15 at 07:57 -0500, Build System wrote:
> NetworkManager-0.4-1.cvs20050315.3.0
>
> * Tue Mar 15 2005 Ray Strode <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 0.4-1.cvs20050315
> - Pull from latest CVS HEAD (hopefully works again)
No it did not, but I thought, what the hec
On Tue, 2005-03-15 at 08:01 -0500, Bill Rugolsky Jr. wrote:
> If it is some huge bloated behemoth that may die due to bugs, or gets
> killed by the OOM-killer, etc., then apps must reliably reconnect. If
> it _can_ crash, it _will_ crash, quite often for certain workloads.
Well, there's no way to
On Tue, 2005-03-15 at 09:28 -0500, Colin Walters wrote:
> If you run a desktop system, you should include X and gdm in there.
> Neither are restarted automatically for security updates. I'm sure
> there are others too that I'm not thinking of.
>
> I would argue that there is really no fundamental
On Mon, 2005-03-14 at 17:14 -0800, Tomislav Vujec wrote:
> On Mon, 14 Mar 2005 18:22:26 -0500, Colin Walters wrote:
> > The system bus will be restarted on reboot, however often that happens.
> > For my personal system that's several times a day, as apm and acpi are
> > broken on my laptop.
>
> I
Hi,
I am trying to use NetworkManager for NLD9 (~SuSE9.1). I
downloaded the sources from (http://people.redhat.com/dcbw/NetworkManager).
It says that NM is distribution and desktop agnostic, but I could not get to
compile the sources. When I ran “configure”
it says that SuSE is not yet
On Mon, Mar 14, 2005 at 10:21:54PM -0500, Havoc Pennington wrote:
> I *strongly* agree with Colin's post for the session dbus. It's crazy to
> consider restarting that thing.
Fair enough.
> For the system dbus, I can imagine that the number of apps involved is
> small enough that we might adapt
On Mon, 14 Mar 2005 17:56:31 -0500, Colin Walters wrote:
>> > There's so
>> > many complicated issues in it, and it'll be a rarely-tested code path.
>> > Right now it's a bug that the Fedora D-BUS and NetworkManager RPM
>> > scripts restart after a package upgrade.
>> >
>> > You should just have
12 matches
Mail list logo
