Current HEAD now requires vpnc 0.3.3

2005-05-20 Thread Dan Williams
Hi, I've just committed some backend improvements to the vpnc VPN service. These are: 1) Pass more VPN errors to NetworkManager and the applet 2) Write config options to vpnc's stdin, not a config file 3) Validate options received from NetworkManager before writing them to vpnc This means: a)

Re: Method "getActiveDevice" doesn't exist

2005-05-20 Thread Dan Williams
On Fri, 20 May 2005, Bastien Nocera wrote: > On Fri, 2005-05-20 at 16:10 -0400, Dan Williams wrote: > > On Fri, 2005-05-20 at 20:32 +0100, Bastien Nocera wrote: > > > Hey Dan, > > > > How can I debug the notification icon, to know why it's saying I don't > > > have any devices? > > > > First of a

Re: Method "getActiveDevice" doesn't exist

2005-05-20 Thread Dan Williams
On Fri, 20 May 2005, Bastien Nocera wrote: > On Fri, 2005-05-20 at 16:10 -0400, Dan Williams wrote: > > On Fri, 2005-05-20 at 20:32 +0100, Bastien Nocera wrote: > > > Hey Dan, > > > > How can I debug the notification icon, to know why it's saying I don't > > > have any devices? > > > > First o

Re: Method "getActiveDevice" doesn't exist

2005-05-20 Thread Bastien Nocera
On Fri, 2005-05-20 at 16:10 -0400, Dan Williams wrote: > On Fri, 2005-05-20 at 20:32 +0100, Bastien Nocera wrote: > > Hey Dan, > > How can I debug the notification icon, to know why it's saying I don't > > have any devices? > > First of all, you're sure you're running 'nm-applet' ? Yup. I tried

Re: Method "getActiveDevice" doesn't exist

2005-05-20 Thread Dan Williams
On Fri, 2005-05-20 at 20:32 +0100, Bastien Nocera wrote: > Hey Dan, > > On Fri, 2005-05-20 at 14:57 -0400, Dan Williams wrote: > > On Fri, 2005-05-20 at 19:32 +0100, Bastien Nocera wrote: > > > Heya, > > > > > > I was trying to get NetworkManager CVS running after seeing the new VPN > > > feature

Re: Method "getActiveDevice" doesn't exist

2005-05-20 Thread Bastien Nocera
Hey Dan, On Fri, 2005-05-20 at 14:57 -0400, Dan Williams wrote: > On Fri, 2005-05-20 at 19:32 +0100, Bastien Nocera wrote: > > Heya, > > > > I was trying to get NetworkManager CVS running after seeing the new VPN > > feature. However, the applet keeps telling me it can't find any devices. > > Y

Re: Method "getActiveDevice" doesn't exist

2005-05-20 Thread Dan Williams
On Fri, 2005-05-20 at 19:32 +0100, Bastien Nocera wrote: > Heya, > > I was trying to get NetworkManager CVS running after seeing the new VPN > feature. However, the applet keeps telling me it can't find any devices. > The problem seems to be deeper than that: Oh, one other thing: Are you running

Re: Method "getActiveDevice" doesn't exist

2005-05-20 Thread Dan Williams
On Fri, 2005-05-20 at 19:32 +0100, Bastien Nocera wrote: > Heya, > > I was trying to get NetworkManager CVS running after seeing the new VPN > feature. However, the applet keeps telling me it can't find any devices. > The problem seems to be deeper than that: > > $ ./nmtest > NM State: 4 > nmwa_d

Method "getActiveDevice" doesn't exist

2005-05-20 Thread Bastien Nocera
Heya, I was trying to get NetworkManager CVS running after seeing the new VPN feature. However, the applet keeps telling me it can't find any devices. The problem seems to be deeper than that: $ ./nmtest NM State: 4 nmwa_dbus_call_nm_method(): org.freedesktop.DBus.Error.UnknownMethod raised: Met

Re: dhcdbd licensing

2005-05-20 Thread Daniel Gryniewicz
On Fri, 2005-05-20 at 10:59 -0400, Dan Williams wrote: > On Fri, 2005-05-20 at 10:16 -0400, Jason Vas Dias wrote: > > > Best to have *some* license on it, rather than just "distributable". > > Why ? > > It removes any question as to what license the code is under. Ambiguity > is bad. It's worse

Re: dhcdbd licensing

2005-05-20 Thread Dan Williams
On Fri, 2005-05-20 at 10:16 -0400, Jason Vas Dias wrote: > > Best to have *some* license on it, rather than just "distributable". > Why ? It removes any question as to what license the code is under. Ambiguity is bad. > > The choice in the end is up to the copyright holder. Jason? > > > I'll pu

Re: dhcdbd licensing

2005-05-20 Thread Jason Vas Dias
On Fri, 2005-05-20 at 06:18, Tom Parker wrote: > On 19 May 2005 18:21:44 -0400, Jonathan Blandford <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > though putting this particular project under the GNU GPL makes a lot > > more sense to me. > > Given also the existing licensing of NetworkManager under the GPL, and >

Re: dhcdbd licensing

2005-05-20 Thread Tom Parker
On 19 May 2005 18:21:44 -0400, Jonathan Blandford <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > though putting this particular project under the GNU GPL makes a lot > more sense to me. Given also the existing licensing of NetworkManager under the GPL, and that some people (myself included) may well partially decid