Am 09.01.20 um 13:26 schrieb Thomas Haller via networkmanager-list:
> Hi all,
>
>
> Currently, we have some LGPL vs. GPL license issue in libnm.
> This will be addressed by [1].
>
> However, I'd like not only to fix that particular issue, but instead
> collect agreement/disagreement of
On Thu, Jan 09, 2020 at 01:26:31PM +0100, Thomas Haller via
networkmanager-list wrote:
> Hi all,
>
>
> Currently, we have some LGPL vs. GPL license issue in libnm.
> This will be addressed by [1].
>
> However, I'd like not only to fix that particular issue, but instead
> collect
I have pushed a new MR[0] which adds the missing license to the meson build
files. Although all the meson build files have been modified in such MR,
there are some files that have not been created by me, so I suppose that an
explicit authorization is also required. These are the meson build files
On Fri, 2020-01-10 at 10:06 +0100, Francesco Giudici via
networkmanager-list wrote:
>
> On 09/01/20 15:40, Dan Williams via networkmanager-list wrote:
> > On Thu, 2020-01-09 at 09:14 -0500, Dan Winship via networkmanager-list
> > wrote:
> > > Thomas asked me to send email agreeing to the
On Fri, 2020-01-10 at 09:18 +0100, Iñigo Martínez via networkmanager-
list wrote:
> Hi,
>
> What about meson build files? Although usually the license is not included,
> there are some exceptions that they do[0].
>
> If necessary, I also agree with relicensing.
It's somewhat unfortunate that
On 09/01/20 15:40, Dan Williams via networkmanager-list wrote:
On Thu, 2020-01-09 at 09:14 -0500, Dan Winship via networkmanager-list
wrote:
Thomas asked me to send email agreeing to the relicensing. I am not
the
copyright holder of any code in NetworkManager and do not believe
that I
have
Hi,
What about meson build files? Although usually the license is not included,
there are some exceptions that they do[0].
If necessary, I also agree with relicensing.
BR,
[0] https://github.com/systemd/systemd/blob/master/meson.build
El jue., 9 ene. 2020 a las 15:40, Dan Williams via
On Thu, 2020-01-09 at 09:14 -0500, Dan Winship via networkmanager-list
wrote:
> Thomas asked me to send email agreeing to the relicensing. I am not
> the
> copyright holder of any code in NetworkManager and do not believe
> that I
> have any say in this decision, but if it turns out that I do,
Thomas asked me to send email agreeing to the relicensing. I am not the
copyright holder of any code in NetworkManager and do not believe that I
have any say in this decision, but if it turns out that I do, then,
sure, I agree.
-- Dan
___
On Thu, Jan 09, 2020 at 01:26:31PM +0100, Thomas Haller via networkmanager-list
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
>
> Currently, we have some LGPL vs. GPL license issue in libnm.
> This will be addressed by [1].
>
> However, I'd like not only to fix that particular issue, but instead
> collect
Hi all,
Currently, we have some LGPL vs. GPL license issue in libnm.
This will be addressed by [1].
However, I'd like not only to fix that particular issue, but instead
collect agreement/disagreement of copyright holders of NetworkManager
code, to perform this and future such relicensing.
I
11 matches
Mail list logo
