Some comments below regarding use of Raven for review of
detections/selections. Also, to answer Chris T-H's question about the
BirdCast transient detector and the energy detector in Raven, the
detector in Raven is a port of the old BirdCast detector to Java. They
should function similarly if
Hi All,
Even though we use Raven and XBAT to analyze our recordings, we also still
use GlassOFire to sort the clips as is a quicker and more efficient than
sorting within Raven. You will find with any program using settings for
export you will have files of slightly different lengths as you
I will look to see if we do..
Sent from my iPhone
On Aug 24, 2009, at 9:54 AM, Thomas Fowler wrote:
>
> Hi Everyone,
>
> I am an engineer chiming in.
>
> I have used this technique to clean up a signal. Technically, it is
> pretty simple to subtract out a "noise" signal.
> The hard part is
Hi Everyone,
I am an engineer chiming in.
I have used this technique to clean up a signal. Technically, it is pretty
simple to subtract out a "noise" signal.
The hard part is getting a signal which is the exact "noise" you want to
subtract. By exact I mean it has
the equivalent gain, and
I agree with Eric that work flow is a major consideration, and
GlassOFire is also a key tool for me. I set it up so that I see 36
sonograms on the screen at a time (2400 x 1600 twps). At these
settings I can easily separate the obvious noise and the calls, and I
can clear out the katydids
