Re: [Nfs-ganesha-devel] zero-copy read

2018-03-11 Thread Matt Benjamin
No, you won't. Matt On Sun, Mar 11, 2018 at 7:15 AM, William Allen Simpson wrote: > On 3/10/18 11:18 AM, Matt Benjamin wrote: >> >> Marcus has code that prototypes using gss_iov from mit-krb5 1.1.12. I >> recall describing this to you in 2013. >> > That would

Re: [Nfs-ganesha-devel] zero-copy read

2018-03-11 Thread William Allen Simpson
On 3/11/18 7:15 AM, William Allen Simpson wrote: On 3/10/18 11:18 AM, Matt Benjamin wrote: Marcus has code that prototypes using gss_iov from mit-krb5 1.1.12.  I recall describing this to you in 2013. That would be surprising, as I didn't start working on this project until a year or so later

Re: [Nfs-ganesha-devel] zero-copy read

2018-03-11 Thread William Allen Simpson
On 3/10/18 11:18 AM, Matt Benjamin wrote: Marcus has code that prototypes using gss_iov from mit-krb5 1.1.12. I recall describing this to you in 2013. That would be surprising, as I didn't start working on this project until a year or so later than that Anyway, last year Marcus sent me a

Re: [Nfs-ganesha-devel] zero-copy read

2018-03-10 Thread Matt Benjamin
Marcus has code that prototypes using gss_iov from mit-krb5 1.1.12. I recall describing this to you in 2013. On Sat, Mar 10, 2018 at 11:12 AM, William Allen Simpson wrote: > On 3/10/18 10:24 AM, William Allen Simpson wrote: > > But as I delved deeper, I'll have

Re: [Nfs-ganesha-devel] zero-copy read

2018-03-10 Thread William Allen Simpson
On 3/10/18 10:24 AM, William Allen Simpson wrote: Finally, and what I'll do this weekend, my attempt to edit xdr_nfs23.c won't pass checkpatch commit, because all the headers are still pre-1989 pre-ANSI K Unfortunately, Red Hat Linux doesn't seem to have cproto built-in, even though it's on the

Re: [Nfs-ganesha-devel] zero-copy read

2018-03-10 Thread Matt Benjamin
Hi Bill, On Sat, Mar 10, 2018 at 10:24 AM, William Allen Simpson wrote: > Now that DanG has a workable vector i-o for read and write, I'm > trying again to make reading zero-copy. Man-oh-man, do we have > our work cut out for us > > It seems that currently