[Nfs-ganesha-devel] Change in ffilz/nfs-ganesha[next]: gtest/test_getattrs_latency: getattrs latency microbenchmark

2018-02-22 Thread GerritHub
>From Girjesh Rajoria : Girjesh Rajoria has uploaded this change for review. ( https://review.gerrithub.io/400929 Change subject: gtest/test_getattrs_latency: getattrs latency microbenchmark ..

[Nfs-ganesha-devel] Change in ffilz/nfs-ganesha[next]: Remove unused fsal_read2() and fsal_write2()

2018-02-22 Thread GerritHub
>From Daniel Gryniewicz : Daniel Gryniewicz has uploaded this change for review. ( https://review.gerrithub.io/401041 Change subject: Remove unused fsal_read2() and fsal_write2() .. Remove unused fsal_read2()

[Nfs-ganesha-devel] Change in ffilz/nfs-ganesha[next]: ASYNC / vector API for read

2018-02-22 Thread GerritHub
>From Daniel Gryniewicz : Daniel Gryniewicz has uploaded this change for review. ( https://review.gerrithub.io/401028 Change subject: ASYNC / vector API for read .. ASYNC / vector API for read This is an API

Re: [Nfs-ganesha-devel] ACL support

2018-02-22 Thread J. Bruce Fields
On Thu, Feb 22, 2018 at 06:18:52AM -0800, Frank Filz wrote: > Ah, that might be an issue. It’s hard to gets POSIX<->NFS V4 ACL > conversion as best as possible (again, impossible to make it perfect, > even for POSIX->NFS V4). Well, POSIX->NFSv4 should be very close to perfect. (Name mapping

[Nfs-ganesha-devel] Change in ffilz/nfs-ganesha[next]: ASYNC / vector API for write

2018-02-22 Thread GerritHub
>From Daniel Gryniewicz : Daniel Gryniewicz has uploaded this change for review. ( https://review.gerrithub.io/401029 Change subject: ASYNC / vector API for write .. ASYNC / vector API for write This is an

Re: [Nfs-ganesha-devel] inconsistent '*' spacing

2018-02-22 Thread Frank Filz
> On 2/21/18 11:35 AM, Frank Filz wrote: > > There's a -n or --no-verify option that will bypass the commit hooks. I > > suggest > trying to commit without that first to make sure the only checkpatch > errors/warnings are for the spacing around * and then commit again with -n to > bypass

Re: [Nfs-ganesha-devel] ACL support

2018-02-22 Thread Frank Filz
Ah, that might be an issue. It’s hard to gets POSIX<->NFS V4 ACL conversion as best as possible (again, impossible to make it perfect, even for POSIX->NFS V4). It would be good to fix all these conversion issues (without copying code from the kernel – note the license differences…) Frank