Looking at the reply code just above this, discovered never executed
code section. I'm surprised the compiler isn't giving a warning.
Checking the Lieb re-indent commit, there was a label handle_err.
I'll go ahead and remove it. It merely seems to be old logging
Just a head's up for somebo
Okay, sounds good. Will work towards getting this right.
Thanks,
Sriram
From: Frank Filz
Date: Friday, March 9, 2018 at 11:20 PM
To: Sriram Patil ,
"nfs-ganesha-devel@lists.sourceforge.net"
Subject: RE: [Nfs-ganesha-devel] About referrals in FSAL_VFS
Hmm, did I sow confusion about fs_locatio
Now that DanG has a workable vector i-o for read and write, I'm
trying again to make reading zero-copy. Man-oh-man, do we have
our work cut out for us
It seems that currently we provide a buffer to read. Then XDR
makes a new object, puts headers into it, makes another data_val
and copies da
Hi Bill,
On Sat, Mar 10, 2018 at 10:24 AM, William Allen Simpson
wrote:
> Now that DanG has a workable vector i-o for read and write, I'm
> trying again to make reading zero-copy. Man-oh-man, do we have
> our work cut out for us
>
> It seems that currently we provide a buffer to read. Then
>From :
william.allen.simp...@gmail.com has uploaded this change for review. (
https://review.gerrithub.io/403407
Change subject: (nfs_worker_thread) remove never executed logging
..
(nfs_worker_thread) remove never executed l
>From :
william.allen.simp...@gmail.com has uploaded this change for review. (
https://review.gerrithub.io/403408
Change subject: (xdr_nfs23.c) ANSI function prototypes
..
(xdr_nfs23.c) ANSI function prototypes
Also remove un
On 3/10/18 10:24 AM, William Allen Simpson wrote:
Finally, and what I'll do this weekend, my attempt to edit
xdr_nfs23.c won't pass checkpatch commit, because all the headers
are still pre-1989 pre-ANSI K&R-style.
Unfortunately, Red Hat Linux doesn't seem to have cproto built-in,
even though it'
Marcus has code that prototypes using gss_iov from mit-krb5 1.1.12. I
recall describing this to you in 2013.
On Sat, Mar 10, 2018 at 11:12 AM, William Allen Simpson
wrote:
> On 3/10/18 10:24 AM, William Allen Simpson wrote:
>
> But as I delved deeper, I'll have to make GSS work on vector i-o, as
> Looking at the reply code just above this, discovered never executed code
> section. I'm surprised the compiler isn't giving a warning.
>
> Checking the Lieb re-indent commit, there was a label handle_err.
>
> I'll go ahead and remove it. It merely seems to be old logging
> Just a head's
