Nginx redirect quey string to url

I am trying to redirect a query string to url and I am using like this but it is somehow not working. Can somebody help? rewrite ^/abc/xyz/def.php?Id=13 http://www.example.com/fhu/foo permanent; rewrite ^/abc/xyz/def.php?Id=14 http://www.example.com/fhu/bar permanent; Posted at Nginx Forum:

Re: Measuring nginx's efficiency

Simply to reduce the attack surface, I would not use PHP if all that is served is static pages.  If you are just serving static pages, you may be able to reduce your verbs to "head" and "get". That is avoid "post." Again attack surface reduction. I put PHP in a "map" search and it is a

Re: Measuring nginx's efficiency

> Well, this php-engine is built into apache itself Just because apache do have a built in PHP handler such as mod_dso doesn't mean it's actually used to serve static files ( I can tell you that the php engine is never hit if you serve static files) > Anyway, considering only this fact, such a

Re: Measuring nginx's efficiency

If your current apache configuration serves static files via the php engine, then you're doing something very wrong. You might or might not see any speed gain depending on your apache configuration, but you should see a big difference in the amount of resources used to serve traffic. As

Re: Measuring nginx's efficiency

On Thu, 2017-06-29 at 16:16 +0300, Valentin V. Bartenev wrote: > On Thursday 29 June 2017 15:32:21 ST wrote: > > On Thu, 2017-06-29 at 15:09 +0300, Valentin V. Bartenev wrote: > > > On Thursday 29 June 2017 14:00:37 ST wrote: > > > > Hello, > > > > > > > > with your help I managed to configure

Re: Measuring nginx's efficiency

> If your current apache configuration serves static files via the php engine, > then you're doing something very wrong. Well, this php-engine is built into apache itself... Anyway, considering only this fact, such a bad apache configuration should not be significantly slower than that of nginx?

XSLT Error - parser error : Document is empty

I have been using the same XSLT files and proxy to an xml document for several generations without any problem. Recently (~1.11) I am getting an error when I do 'nginx -t': /etc/nginx/xsl/so.xslt:1: parser error : Document is empty error xsltParseStylesheetFile : cannot parse

Re: Strange issue after nginx update

Have you enabled the slowlog and request_slowlog_timeout directives in the php-fpm pool that this request is going to? These may provide a hint as to where the problem lies. On Fri, Jun 30, 2017 at 1:46 AM, Andrea Soracchi wrote: > Hi Richard, > > I have the same

Re: Nginx redirect quey string to url

rewrite and location matching do not include query strings. As a quick workaround, I believe you could do something like this: if ($request_uri = "/abc/xyz/def.php?Id=13") { return 301 " http://www.example.com/fhu/foo;; } Be aware that this matches the request exactly - query string parameters

Re: Nginx redirect quey string to url

Thanks Richard for replying but somehow this is not working. I see it is being redirected to http://www.example.com/fhu but not to http://www.example.com/fhu/foo and http://www.example.com/fhu/bar. As you mentioned I have matched the case exactly. Posted at Nginx Forum:

Re: set_real_ip_from, real_ip_header directive in ngx_http_realip_module

Hello! On Thu, Jun 29, 2017 at 09:08:40AM -0400, foxgab wrote: > if nginx is behind another proxy, that proxy set the X-Forwarded-for header > with the real client ip, and the configration of nginx is : > > location / { > proxy_set_header X-Forwarded-For $proxy_add_x_forwarded_for; >

Re: Strange issue after nginx update

set your worker_process to 1 and try again ___ nginx mailing list nginx@nginx.org http://mailman.nginx.org/mailman/listinfo/nginx

Re: Strange issue after nginx update

If you want to stream the upload directly to your backend, you should consider fastcgi_request_buffering[1]. The problem is most likely with your PHP backend though, you should examine why it takes so long to process the request. [1]

Re: Strange issue after nginx update

Hi Payam, the problem is between Nginx and Php-fpm, but I have set the debug level log to nginx and php-fpm. Nginx: 2017/06/29 10:05:14 [warn] 5252#5252: *1613 a client request body is buffered to a temporary file /var/lib/nginx/body/44, client: 192.168.18.18, server:

Re: Measuring nginx's efficiency

On Thursday 29 June 2017 14:00:37 ST wrote: > Hello, > > with your help I managed to configure nginx and our website now can be > accessed both - through apache and nginx. > > Now, how can I prove to my boss that nginx is more efficient than apache > to switch to it? How do I measure its

Re: set_real_ip_from, real_ip_header directive in ngx_http_realip_module

if nginx is behind another proxy, that proxy set the X-Forwarded-for header with the real client ip, and the configration of nginx is : location / { proxy_set_header X-Forwarded-For $proxy_add_x_forwarded_for; real_ip_headerX-Forwarded-For; set_real_ip_from 192.168.0.0/16; } whether the

Re: Measuring nginx's efficiency

On Thursday 29 June 2017 15:32:21 ST wrote: > On Thu, 2017-06-29 at 15:09 +0300, Valentin V. Bartenev wrote: > > On Thursday 29 June 2017 14:00:37 ST wrote: > > > Hello, > > > > > > with your help I managed to configure nginx and our website now can be > > > accessed both - through apache and

Re: Measuring nginx's efficiency

On Thu, 2017-06-29 at 15:09 +0300, Valentin V. Bartenev wrote: > On Thursday 29 June 2017 14:00:37 ST wrote: > > Hello, > > > > with your help I managed to configure nginx and our website now can be > > accessed both - through apache and nginx. > > > > Now, how can I prove to my boss that nginx

RE: Help developing a block directive

I believe it happens because you changed cf->cmd_type, so when nginx tries to parse the second location, it thinks it’s in a scope of ‘my custom module conf’ and not in a scope of ‘server’, and therefore doesn’t recognize the location directive. Nginx doesn’t automatically parse the contents of

Re: [PATCH 2 of 3] PSK: add PSK identity variable

Hello! On Thu, Jun 22, 2017 at 01:24:57PM +, Karstens, Nate wrote: > # HG changeset patch > # User Nate Karstens > # Date 1498137207 18000 > # Thu Jun 22 08:13:27 2017 -0500 > # Node ID a4635fa4a0cabf5312cda617b8010ea14279ab1c > # Parent

RE: [PATCH 1 of 3] PSK: connection support

Maxim, Thanks for the comments. I'll try to start on those in a couple of days. My company uses Outlook/Exchange for email, so I don't think I'll be able to use hg email, do you have any other suggestions? Thanks also for your patience, I've used Git quite a bit but am new to Mercurial.

Re: [PATCH 1 of 3] PSK: connection support

Hello! On Thu, Jun 22, 2017 at 01:24:54PM +, Karstens, Nate wrote: > # HG changeset patch > # User Nate Karstens > # Date 1498137180 18000 > # Thu Jun 22 08:13:00 2017 -0500 > # Node ID 3fb3c4928d06029ca1d57853a163c9f56fa90bca > # Parent

Re: [PATCH 3 of 3] PSK: add identity hint config directive

Hello! On Thu, Jun 22, 2017 at 01:24:59PM +, Karstens, Nate wrote: > # HG changeset patch > # User Nate Karstens > # Date 1498137243 18000 > # Thu Jun 22 08:14:03 2017 -0500 > # Node ID b706695658216c88716904519467a36c1aac7ac9 > # Parent

Re: Dynamic Module Portability

Got it. Thank you so much! I'll probably do a mix of both by having an install script that parses the output of -V and provide guidance accordingly for the stray cows :D On Jun 29, 2017 7:07 AM, "Maxim Dounin" wrote: Hello! On Thu, Jun 29, 2017 at 12:27:50AM -0700, Joseph

Re: Dynamic Module Portability

Or, I can just require that the host version of nginx be installed with the --with-compat option. On Thu, Jun 29, 2017 at 12:38 AM, Joseph Spencer < spen...@kogosoftwarellc.com> wrote: > Looks like I can grep NGX_MODULE_SIGNATURE from the nginx binary itself. > Depending on the version of nginx,

Dynamic Module Portability

I'm looking to create a portable binary, and from everything I can read, it is almost impossible. The recommended approach seems to be to expose source code and require users to compile. This is painful because it requires the source code and gcc to be available: a hard sell for the lazy

Re: Dynamic Module Portability

Looks like I can grep NGX_MODULE_SIGNATURE from the nginx binary itself. Depending on the version of nginx, it could be a decent option. I'm literally only dependent on core and http. Most of the elements of the signature appear to be extraneous. On Thu, Jun 29, 2017 at 12:27 AM, Joseph Spencer

Re: Dynamic Module Portability

Hello! On Thu, Jun 29, 2017 at 12:27:50AM -0700, Joseph Spencer wrote: > I'm looking to create a portable binary, and from everything I can read, it > is almost impossible. The recommended approach seems to be to expose > source code and require users to compile. This is painful because it >