Thanks, I had not heard of that solution so I will chase it down to see if we
can make it work.
As for the response, I assumed that was the case and what’s the point of SSL if
there was a way to bypass it…just wishful thinking…
___
Michael Friscia
Office
We have a problem where we have a large number of vanity domain names that are
redirected. For example we have surgery.yale.edu which redirects to
medicine.yale.edu/surgery. This works fine until someone tries to request
https://surgery.yale.edu. For administrative reasons, I cannot get a
Hello!
On Wed, Jul 18, 2018 at 03:10:54PM +, Friscia, Michael wrote:
> We have a problem where we have a large number of vanity domain
> names that are redirected. For example we have surgery.yale.edu
> which redirects to medicine.yale.edu/surgery. This works fine
> until someone tries to
Could you use letsencrypt to manage all those certs?
What you want can't work: the client makes an SSL request, you respond
(with a 301), the client detects that the interaction was not properly
authenticated, and so complains to the user. It's out of your hands,
which is the whole point of SSL
Maxim Dounin Wrote:
---
> The explanation on why it isn't working was in the first paragraph
> I wrote:
>
> : The limit_req directive doesn't try to limit requests already
> : limited, as well as subrequests within these requests. You should
Hello!
On Tue, Jul 17, 2018 at 05:23:44PM -0400, jarstewa wrote:
[...]
> So, I think you seem to be suggesting that throttling /auth should not be
> necessary, and may in fact be a bad idea. But I would still like to
> understand why it isn't working as I would expect.
The explanation on why
details: http://hg.nginx.org/nginx/rev/45e513c3540d
branches:
changeset: 7321:45e513c3540d
user: Ruslan Ermilov
date: Tue Jul 17 15:30:43 2018 +0300
description:
Fixed invalid access to location defined as an empty string.
diffstat:
src/http/modules/ngx_http_fastcgi_module.c |
details: http://hg.nginx.org/njs/rev/9322e8eab0b6
branches:
changeset: 560:9322e8eab0b6
user: Dmitry Volyntsev
date: Wed Jul 18 15:41:55 2018 +0300
description:
String.bytesFrom() method.
The method creates a byte string from an array containing octets:
String.bytesFrom(array).
Здравствуйте,
18.07.18 13:10, Vitaly Ponomarev wrote:
Добрый день.
Насколько допустимо посылать HUP сразу всем процессам nginx при условии, что в
данной виртуалке запущен только один демон nginx'а?
Т.е. делать вот так:
==
killall -HUP nginx
==
pkill -f "nginx: master" -HUP
Ну и/или другие
Hello!
On Wed, Jul 18, 2018 at 01:10:55PM +0300, Vitaly Ponomarev wrote:
> Насколько допустимо посылать HUP сразу всем процессам nginx при
> условии, что в данной виртуалке запущен только один демон
> nginx'а?
> Т.е. делать вот так:
> ==
> killall -HUP nginx
> ==
Конкретно HUP - рабочими
Добрый день.
Насколько допустимо посылать HUP сразу всем процессам nginx при условии, что в
данной виртуалке запущен только один демон nginx'а?
Т.е. делать вот так:
==
killall -HUP nginx
==
>Вторник, 17 июля 2018, 16:07 +03:00 от Maxim Dounin :
>
>Hello!
>
>On Tue, Jul 17, 2018 at 02:40:18AM
11 matches
Mail list logo
