--
Maxim Konovalov
+7 (910) 4293178
http://nginx.com/services.html
___
nginx mailing list
nginx@nginx.org
http://mailman.nginx.org/mailman/listinfo/nginx
On 5/14/13 3:27 PM, David Geistert wrote:
Hey,
I only want to ask, when the Debian Wheezy package will be released
in http://nginx.org/packages/debian/
As a follow-up:
http://mailman.nginx.org/pipermail/nginx/2013-May/039096.html
http://nginx.org/en/linux_packages.html
--
Maxim Konovalov
+7
___
nginx mailing list
nginx@nginx.org
http://mailman.nginx.org/mailman/listinfo/nginx
___
nginx mailing list
nginx@nginx.org
http://mailman.nginx.org/mailman/listinfo/nginx
--
Maxim Konovalov
http
page into the distribution
once it's ready?
I think it's a good idea while we manage to keep a single source for
both nginx.org docs and man page.
--
Maxim Konovalov
http://nginx.com
___
nginx mailing list
nginx@nginx.org
http://mailman.nginx.org
On 12/19/13 1:59 PM, athalas wrote:
Where would we find documentation on the fastopen parameter?
http://nginx.org/r/listen
--
Maxim Konovalov
http://nginx.com
___
nginx mailing list
nginx@nginx.org
http://mailman.nginx.org/mailman/listinfo/nginx
support in our roadmap
(http://trac.nginx.org/nginx/roadmap) and planning to finish this
project by the end of January, 2014.
During this work we will evaluate the Taobao patch too.
Thanks again,
Maxim Konovalov
--
Maxim Konovalov
http://nginx.com
://nginx.com/blog/nginx-and-the-heartbleed-vulnerability/
--
Maxim Konovalov
http://nginx.com
___
nginx mailing list
nginx@nginx.org
http://mailman.nginx.org/mailman/listinfo/nginx
On 6/18/14 4:21 PM, akurczyk wrote:
I am expecting lets say 20 connections per hour.
[...]
Personally I don't think that you need any optimizations for such load.
--
Maxim Konovalov
http://nginx.com
___
nginx mailing list
nginx@nginx.org
http
have been
addressed? It seems like a major stability concern.
Just install 1.7.4.
--
Maxim Konovalov
http://nginx.com
___
nginx mailing list
nginx@nginx.org
http://mailman.nginx.org/mailman/listinfo/nginx
NGINX_VERSION tmp/src/core/nginx.h
#define NGINX_VERSION 1.7.5
#define NGINX_VER nginx/ NGINX_VERSION
--
Maxim Konovalov
http://nginx.com
___
nginx mailing list
nginx@nginx.org
http://mailman.nginx.org/mailman/listinfo/nginx
in that
branch too, since it's still a current version?
We are working now on the another bugfix in the nginx resolver code
and will consider backporting these patches to 1.6.2 (ETA ~2 weeks).
--
Maxim Konovalov
http://nginx.com
___
nginx mailing list
nginx
On 8/26/14 5:18 PM, Maxim Konovalov wrote:
Hi Jason,
On 8/26/14 12:47 PM, Jason Woods wrote:
Hi,
Where do I need to ask if a bug fix will be treated as major and
ported to the 1.6 feature stable branch?
Specifically, the following is having a significant impact for us,
and makes using
in production (this is what we actually recommend
to do; e.g. nginx-plus based on 1.7 branch currently).
We will discuss merging this code to 1.6 for the next release but we
don't have a schedule for 1.6.3 yet.
--
Maxim Konovalov
http://nginx.com
___
nginx
On 2/18/15 6:57 PM, rik...@deds.nl wrote:
On 2/18/15 5:42 PM, rik...@deds.nl wrote:
You can't optimize a site to the max without SPDY.
That's doesn't match our experience.
Also, enabling SPDY doesn't make your site faster automagically. It
is not a silver bullet.
--
Maxim Konovalov
http
On 2/18/15 5:42 PM, rik...@deds.nl wrote:
You can't optimize a site to the max without SPDY.
That's doesn't match our experience.
Also, enabling SPDY doesn't make your site faster automagically. It
is not a silver bullet.
--
Maxim Konovalov
http://nginx.com
. It works just well there.
--
Maxim Konovalov
http://nginx.com
___
nginx mailing list
nginx@nginx.org
http://mailman.nginx.org/mailman/listinfo/nginx
bug?
Put it in the same level as http. E.g.
...
http { foo }
stream { bar }
# EOF
--
Maxim Konovalov
http://nginx.com
___
nginx mailing list
nginx@nginx.org
http://mailman.nginx.org/mailman/listinfo/nginx
appriciated.
Regards,
This bugfix was merged to 1.6 and will be a part of 1.6.3 release
which is out today.
--
Maxim Konovalov
http://nginx.com
___
nginx mailing list
nginx@nginx.org
http://mailman.nginx.org/mailman/listinfo/nginx
On 6/10/15 1:06 PM, itpp2012 wrote:
Try the latest 1.9.2, in 191 is was added but not working.
http part is fully functional in 1.9.1. The author has different
issue and Lukas Tribus already answered.
--
Maxim Konovalov
http://nginx.com
___
nginx
On 6/4/15 1:16 AM, Thiago Farina wrote:
Thanks all devs who put Nginx together and made this awesome piece of work!
With it and freedns.afraid.org I was able to host my site from my home server.
Thanks for using nginx!
--
Maxim Konovalov
http://nginx.com
On 6/25/15 8:21 PM, Francis Daly wrote:
On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 06:55:05PM +0300, Maxim Konovalov wrote:
Hi there,
it seems that you start to learn Russian! :-)
That's the joy of machine translation :-)
I hope I didn't end up answering the wrong question.
Valentin wrote a good blog
/
There is a complete and simple configuration in the Configuring
Thread Pools section, near the end of the post.
Also, there is a russian version of this article on habrahabr.ru.
--
Maxim Konovalov
http://nginx.com
___
nginx mailing list
nginx@nginx.org
http
On 7/31/15 8:05 PM, Jerry Wyman wrote:
Hi,
I’m new to nginx and am trying to load-balance ssh sessions to an
autoscaling group of ECS instances in AWS.
[...]
Just curious: is it just a test or a real use-case? Why does anybody
want to load-balance ssh?
--
Maxim Konovalov
http://nginx.com
Hi,
[...]
Thank you, but the download doesn't start on my Firefox.
Check your mailbox instead. You should receive a link to the preview.
--
Maxim Konovalov
http://nginx.com
___
nginx mailing list
nginx@nginx.org
http://mailman.nginx.org/mailman
Hello,
Andrew Hutchings wrote a blog post about new debugging features you
can find in nginx 1.9.2 and later:
https://www.nginx.com/blog/new-debugging-features-probe-nginx-internals/
--
Maxim Konovalov
http://nginx.com
___
nginx mailing list
nginx
capability this weekend.
nginx admin guide(*) and blog.nginx.com is a good start
* https://www.nginx.com/resources/admin-guide/
--
Maxim Konovalov
Discover best practices for building delivering apps at scale.
nginx.conf 2015: Sept. 22-24, San Francisco. http://nginx.com/nginxconf
configured in NGINX through REST
monitoring API's?
please forward your requests regarding nginx-plus trials to
evaluati...@nginx.com.
Thanks,
Maxim Konovalov
--
Maxim Konovalov
http://nginx.com
___
nginx mailing list
nginx@nginx.org
http
here:
http://nginx.org/en/docs/welcome_nginx_facebook.html
--
Maxim Konovalov
___
nginx mailing list
nginx@nginx.org
http://mailman.nginx.org/mailman/listinfo/nginx
t; Lua? does/should it matter?
>> It doesn't matter.
>>
> Hello,
>
> Could you please clarify, is this module will be in main code base
> or should be installed as separate module?
>
It should be compiled in as an external module:
http://hg.nginx.org/njs/file/11d4d66851ed/READ
g/njs/
>
> This is preliminary version.
> No built-in JS objects, no closures.
> We appreciate your feedback on JS interface to nginx internals.
>
.. and for readers in twitter: we are not going to kill lua or any
other great nginx modules.
--
Maxim Konovalov
__
or even some
> simple substitution, then splice() cannot be used.
>
It should fit in our stream quite nicely.
--
Maxim Konovalov
___
nginx mailing list
nginx@nginx.org
http://mailman.nginx.org/mailman/listinfo/nginx
On 12/16/15 7:52 PM, mex wrote:
> this one: https://www.nginx.com/blog/new-joomla-exploit-cve-2015-8562/
>
[...]
Thanks for feedback. I passed your comment to appropriate people.
--
Maxim Konovalov
___
nginx mailing list
nginx@nginx.or
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 12/24/15 12:24 PM, Dewangga Bachrul Alam wrote:
> Sorry I forgot something, I'm using Nginx Plus R7.
>
[...]
Hi Dewangga,
please open a support ticket. Our engineers will help you with that
in a minute.
- --
Maxim Konovalov
-BEG
e
> * ssl_stapling_responder
> * ssl_stapling_verify
> * ssl_trusted_certificate
> * ssl_verify_client
> * ssl_verify_depth
>
> Is there a reason why these are not included? Can we expect them being added?
>
The directives above cover several very different areas and
use-
On 6/6/16 1:00 PM, A. Schulze wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I'm using horde and observe similar errors since some weeks.
> Unsure if the same problem would be the reason.
>
> Maxim Konovalov:
>> It was fixed in 1.11.0 two weeks ago.
>
> I found one patch 'preread_
On 6/6/16 10:53 AM, ZaneCEO wrote:
> Thank you very much!! At least now I know what's going on! Let's wait for a
> patch...
>
It was fixed in 1.11.0 two weeks ago.
--
Maxim Konovalov
___
nginx mailing list
nginx@nginx.org
http://mailman.
ncourage use to click on that website
> link.)
>
Actually, a number of such complains is still surprisingly low.
> I think another mistake is to have the error page indicate the rev
> of nginx. That is an easy way for someone to spot a vulnerable rev
> of the nginx on a serv
ll route TCP calls to a single host:port to different host:port combos
> based on the hostname held in the SNI information.
>
Currently the stream (tcp/udp lb) module misses this feature.
However, we do have it in the short-term roadmap and hope to have it
implemented more or less soon.
-
e behaviour though:
https://www.nginx.com/resources/admin-guide/tcp-load-balancing/#hash
--
Maxim Konovalov
___
nginx mailing list
nginx@nginx.org
http://mailman.nginx.org/mailman/listinfo/nginx
e connection.
>
Not sure I understand your request.
For tcp nginx balances new connections based on the configured load
balancing discipline (rr by default).
> Frank
>
> On Thursday, June 23, 2016, Maxim Konovalov <ma...@nginx.com
> <mailto:ma...@nginx.com>> wrote:
>
t;>>
>>> ___
>>> nginx mailing list
>>> nginx@nginx.org
>>> http://mailman.nginx.org/mailman/listinfo/nginx
>>>
>>
>> ___
>> nginx mailing lis
On 2/22/16 2:56 PM, Evert Meulie wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I have obtained the sources via git
> from https://github.com/nginx/nginx , but seem to be missing a
> 'configure' script.
>
> Where/how do I get that?
>
http://hg.nginx.org/nginx/file/tip/auto/config
IPs for proxy_bind, or is there another workaround to have
> more connections to upstream server farm?
>
Yes, it's possible -- proxy_bind supports variables (this support
was added exactly for the use case above).
--
Maxim Konovalov
___
nginx mailing l
y;
> listen [::]:80 accept_filter=http_ready;
> listen 443 ssl accept_filter=data_ready;
> listen [::]:443 ssl accept_filter=data_ready;
>
[...]
They should be "httpready" and "dataready", see nginx.org/r/listen
for more details.
Also see man p
t;worker_processes auto".
http://nginx.org/r/worker_processes
--
Maxim Konovalov
___
nginx mailing list
nginx@nginx.org
http://mailman.nginx.org/mailman/listinfo/nginx
nginx.org/pipermail/nginx-devel/2016-March/008012.html
--
Maxim Konovalov
___
nginx mailing list
nginx@nginx.org
http://mailman.nginx.org/mailman/listinfo/nginx
sn't come from nginx.org.
If you built your own package or compiled nginx from the nginx.org
sources you are safe with 1.8.1.
--
Maxim Konovalov
___
nginx mailing list
nginx@nginx.org
http://mailman.nginx.org/mailman/listinfo/nginx
r we can move
> forward with higher one ?
>
>
> Any help will be appreciated!
>
Does it help?
https://alas.aws.amazon.com/ALAS-2016-655.html
--
Maxim Konovalov
___
nginx mailing list
nginx@nginx.org
http://mailman.nginx.org/mailman/listinfo/nginx
On 3/1/16 3:46 PM, drhowarddrfine wrote:
> Do you know why FreeBSD does not do this? Is there a technical reason to not
> do that?
>
Just because you need someone to write this code for FreeBSD.
--
Maxim Konovalov
___
nginx mailing l
red in FreeBSD at this time?
>>>>>>
[...]
> My point is that I would like to see more rigorous, bullet-proof
> config parsing/testing on the part of nginx. This is one example.
> We can agree to disagree on its importance to users.
>
This is definitely something that makes perfect sense. We will try
to figure out how to fix it when time permits.
--
Maxim Konovalov
___
nginx mailing list
nginx@nginx.org
http://mailman.nginx.org/mailman/listinfo/nginx
or less
recent, i.e 1.9.2+, please run "nginx -T" command to collect the
configuration. Otherwise just find a folder with the nginx configs
and check for another error_log directives (e.g. grep -r error_log
/etc/nginx/).
Hope this helps,
M
on is supported. Especially if that support changes
>> over
>> time.
>
> I don't claim to know how "difficult" that would be, but with all
> the extremely talented coders in the Nginx group, I would think that
> "difficult" would not be a barrier to "doin
On 3/1/16 4:08 PM, drhowarddrfine wrote:
> Yes but is there a technical reason why it hasn't been done yet? Does
> FreeBSD have a reason to not do it? Just because Linux did does not mean it
> should be done.
>
Please approach FreeBSD developers.
--
Max
On 3/1/16 8:19 PM, Jim Ohlstein wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Mar 1, 2016, at 9:35 AM, Maxim Konovalov <ma...@nginx.com
> <mailto:ma...@nginx.com>> wrote:
>
>> On 3/1/16 5:23 PM, Jim Ohlstein wrote:
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> On 3/1/16 8:34 AM, Andr
solutions are:
>
> - use UNIX domain sockets (this works when you have everything on
> a single host);
>
> - add more local addresses on nginx side and use proxy_bind to
> balance users between these addresses.
>
+
https://www.nginx.com/blog/overcoming-ephemeral-port-ex
nginx
> (not Nginx Plus).
The blog post I sent has nothing -plus specific in this area.
--
Maxim Konovalov
___
nginx mailing list
nginx@nginx.org
http://mailman.nginx.org/mailman/listinfo/nginx
Hi Dewangga,
On 7/28/16 10:31 AM, Dewangga Bachrul Alam wrote:
> Hello!
>
> I've tried to build nginx 1.11.3 with --with-stream module parameter,
> but, attached below:
>
[...]
That was already fixed.
As a workaround you can add "--with-stream_ssl_module" to your
c
t; nginx mailing list
> nginx@nginx.org <mailto:nginx@nginx.org>
> http://mailman.nginx.org/mailman/listinfo/nginx
>
>
>
>
> ___
> nginx mailing list
> nginx@nginx.org
> http://mailman.nginx.org/mailman/l
$foo and $bar variables and set JavaScript
+# functions foo() and bar() from the included JavaScript
+# file as their handlers
+js_set $foo foo;
+js_set $bar bar;
+
+return $foo-$bar;
+ }
+}
forum.nginx.org/read.php?2,264913,272170#msg-272170
>
> ___
> nginx mailing list
> nginx@nginx.org
> http://mailman.nginx.org/mailman/listinfo/nginx
>
--
Maxim Konovalov
___
nginx
Hello,
On 1/13/17 10:46 PM, Maxim Konovalov wrote:
> On 1/13/17 12:51 PM, nginxsantos wrote:
>> Thanks Maxim.
>> I am looking for a scenario to load balance the LWM2M server (my backend
>> servers would be LWM2M Servers). I am thinking of using the Nginx UDP
>> loadbal
mailman.nginx.org/mailman/listinfo/nginx
> <http://mailman.nginx.org/mailman/listinfo/nginx>
>
>
>
>
> ___
> nginx mailing list
> nginx@nginx.org
> http://mailman.nginx.org/mailman/listinfo/nginx
>
--
Maxim Konovalov
Join us at nginx.conf, Sept. 7-9, Austin, TX: http://nginx.com/nginxconf
___
nginx mailing list
nginx@nginx.org
http://mailman.nginx.org/mailman/listinfo/nginx
On 8/22/16 8:30 PM, Maxim Konovalov wrote:
> On 8/22/16 8:23 PM, Richard Stanway wrote:
>> See https://nginx.org/en/linux_packages.html#stable
>>
>> PGP key links are hard coded to http URLs:
>>
>>
>> For Debian/Ubuntu, in order to authent
On Wed, Aug 24, 2016 at 1:58 PM, Maxim Konovalov <ma...@nginx.com
> <mailto:ma...@nginx.com>> wrote:
>
> On 8/22/16 8:30 PM, Maxim Konovalov wrote:
> > On 8/22/16 8:23 PM, Richard Stanway wrote:
> >> See https://nginx.org/en/linux_
On 8/22/16 8:15 PM, Richard Stanway wrote:
> Could you at least fix the https download page, so it doesn't
> directly link to a HTTP PGP key?
>
It works correctly: https://nginx.org/en/download.html
> On Mon, Aug 22, 2016 at 6:49 PM, Maxim Konovalov <ma...@nginx.com
> <m
n when I can't download new version of
> OpenSSL using old
> version of OpenSSL is ridiculous, but they have configured
> openssl.org <http://openssl.org> that way.
> How I supposed to use Internet then?
>
> wbr, Valentin V. Bartenev
>
--
Maxim Konovalov
Join us at nginx.conf, Sept. 7-9, Austin, TX: http://nginx.com/nginxconf
___
nginx mailing list
nginx@nginx.org
http://mailman.nginx.org/mailman/listinfo/nginx
On 8/23/16 4:15 PM, B.R. wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 22, 2016 at 6:49 PM, Maxim Konovalov
> <ma...@nginx.com <mailto:ma...@nginx.com>> wrote:
> On 8/22/16 7:41 PM, B.R. wrote:
> > In 2016, stating that content served over HTTP is 'secure' blows my
> >
ted.
> Not plus vs community. Are there any plans on releasing the server
> push feature for the community version?
>
> On Tue, Nov 8, 2016 at 6:00 PM, Maxim Konovalov <ma...@nginx.com
> <mailto:ma...@nginx.com>> wrote:
>
> Andrei,
>
> On 11/8/16 6:53
if not some
> extraordinary delays with this feature as well considering it's
> marketing appeal and profit. You're better off doing like
> CloudFlare, and investing in some dev time if you want push
> support in the community version any time soon. The ground
...]
Yes, right, partially because HTTP/2 push was never "the primary
boost" for HTTP/2 but I agree that different people at different
time can have very different ideas about the same thing.
I'd also encourage to read the comments in this blog post.
--
Maxim Konovalov
the binary header preamble. Can
> someone confirm?
>
> https://thomas.glanzmann.de/tmp/nginx.pcap
>
Yes, that's right -- no support for the proxy proto v2.
--
Maxim Konovalov
___
nginx mailing list
nginx@nginx.org
http://mailman.nginx.org/mailman/listinfo/nginx
:22
>
> I also tried adding a log_format section in the event that was required. Any
> advice/suggestions welcome.
>
You are probably using an old version of nginx --
ngx_stream_log_module was added in nginx-1.11.4.
--
Maxim Konovalov
___
nginx mailing list
nginx@nginx.org
http://mailman.nginx.org/mailman/listinfo/nginx
> UDP. So, I was thinking if I could offload the DTLS traffic here.
>
> Any thoughts?
>
OK, thanks for sharing this.
Indeed, we do have this item in the stream module roadmap. I wouldn't
promise any ETA for this specific feature, still need to figure out
the demand for it from the communi
sendfile2-to-freebsd/
--
Maxim Konovalov
___
nginx mailing list
nginx@nginx.org
http://mailman.nginx.org/mailman/listinfo/nginx
Hello,
On 1/12/17 2:26 PM, nginxsantos wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Does the opensource Nginx support DTLS offloading when acting as an UDP
> loadbalancer?
>
It doesn't.
--
Maxim Konovalov
___
nginx mailing list
nginx@nginx.org
http://mailman.ng
On 1/12/17 2:30 PM, Maxim Konovalov wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On 1/12/17 2:26 PM, nginxsantos wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Does the opensource Nginx support DTLS offloading when acting as an UDP
>> loadbalancer?
>>
> It doesn't.
>
Btw, it would be usefu
s communication has been maintained and nor is
> this communication free of viruses, interceptions or
> interference".'. If the disclaimer can't be applied, attach the
> message to a new disclaimer message.
>
>
>
> _____
ives the
> HTTP messages, it will parse the message and then put to those registerd TCP
> clients. Any idea how can this be done.
> Thanks, Santos
>
I'd check if nchan module suits your needs.
--
Maxim Konovalov
___
nginx mailin
On 20/04/2017 17:41, Kees Bos wrote:
> On do, 2017-04-20 at 17:12 +0300, Maxim Konovalov wrote:
>> Hi Kees,
>>
>> On 20/04/2017 17:06, Kees Bos wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> Does someone have experience with nginx-mail and the proxy
&
. There were no plans for that basically because nobody
asked before.
What's your backend software which supports proxy proto?
Thanks,
Maxim
--
Maxim Konovalov
___
nginx mailing list
nginx@nginx.org
http://mailman.nginx.org/mailman/listinfo/nginx
h slot could
> get out of balance
> over time.
>
>
> On Wed, Mar 8, 2017 at 3:20 AM, Maxim Konovalov <ma...@nginx.com> wrote:
>> On 3/7/17 10:50 PM, larsg wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> we are operating native nginx 1.8.1 on RHEL as a reverse proxy.
>&
;>>>
>>>>
>>>> I’m not sure if you can proxy web socket connections like http-connections.
>>>>
>>>> After all, they are persistent (hence the large number of connections).
>>>>
>>>> Why can’t you (OP) do the upgrade to 1.10? I thought it’s the only
>>>> „supported" version anyway?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ___
>>>> nginx mailing list
>>>> nginx@nginx.org
>>>> http://mailman.nginx.org/mailman/listinfo/nginx
>>> ___
>>> nginx mailing list
>>> nginx@nginx.org
>>> http://mailman.nginx.org/mailman/listinfo/nginx
>>
>> ___
>> nginx mailing list
>> nginx@nginx.org
>> http://mailman.nginx.org/mailman/listinfo/nginx
> ___
> nginx mailing list
> nginx@nginx.org
> http://mailman.nginx.org/mailman/listinfo/nginx
>
--
Maxim Konovalov
___
nginx mailing list
nginx@nginx.org
http://mailman.nginx.org/mailman/listinfo/nginx
rally: to overcome the 64k problem?
>
We ever wrote a blog post for you!
https://www.nginx.com/blog/overcoming-ephemeral-port-exhaustion-nginx-plus/
As a side note: I'd really encourage all of you to add our blog rss
to your feeds. While there is some marketing "
/www.nginx.com/resources/admin-guide/nginx-plus-modsecurity-waf-installation-logging/
https://www.nginx.com/blog/compiling-and-installing-modsecurity-for-open-source-nginx/
--
Maxim Konovalov
___
nginx mailing list
nginx@nginx.org
http://mailman.nginx.org/mailman/listinfo/nginx
x-oss source to compile dynamic modules for nginx-plus.
https://www.nginx.com/blog/compiling-dynamic-modules-nginx-plus/
--
Maxim Konovalov
___
nginx mailing list
nginx@nginx.org
http://mailman.nginx.org/mailman/listinfo/nginx
to approach -plus support channel. You can open a
support ticket just by forwarding this email.
--
Maxim Konovalov
___
nginx mailing list
nginx@nginx.org
http://mailman.nginx.org/mailman/listinfo/nginx
/192.168.183.20:389>""
>
>
> Any ideas?
Out of the blue: this is your local packet filter/firewall rules.
By the way, it makes sense to approach nginx-plus support channel
with such questions.
Best regards,
Maxim
--
Maxim Konovalov
___
nginx mailing list
nginx@nginx.org
http://mailman.nginx.org/mailman/listinfo/nginx
metrics for any obvious limits.
Also, it makes sense to read the following great slides about udp
perf tuning from Toshiaki Makita from NTT:
http://textlab.io/doc/15478046/boost-udp-transaction-performance
--
Maxim Konovalov
___
nginx mai
ons!
We wish you and all your team success with your project.
--
Maxim Konovalov
___
nginx mailing list
nginx@nginx.org
http://mailman.nginx.org/mailman/listinfo/nginx
line in production.
--
Maxim Konovalov
"I'm not a software developer, but it doesn't seem as rocket
science"
___
nginx mailing list
nginx@nginx.org
http://mailman.nginx.org/mailman/listinfo/nginx
Hi Matthew,
If you are nginx-plus customer it makes sense to open a support ticket.
Thanks,
Maxim
--
Maxim Konovalov
___
nginx mailing list
nginx@nginx.org
http://mailman.nginx.org/mailman/listinfo/nginx
; from my upstream config. I was trying without the
> 64k.
>
>
> On 27/04/2018 19:36, Maxim Konovalov wrote:
>> Hi Matthew,
>>
>> If you are nginx-plus customer it makes sense to open a support ticket.
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Maxim
>>
>
option available
at this time.
Thanks,
Maxim
--
Maxim Konovalov
___
nginx mailing list
nginx@nginx.org
http://mailman.nginx.org/mailman/listinfo/nginx
2 release is anticipated this week.
Maxim
--
Maxim Konovalov
___
nginx mailing list
nginx@nginx.org
http://mailman.nginx.org/mailman/listinfo/nginx
't see this mentioned in the release notes?
>
You are probably talking about nginx-unit project, right?
--
Maxim Konovalov
___
nginx mailing list
nginx@nginx.org
http://mailman.nginx.org/mailman/listinfo/nginx
ny nginx variable in stream which
> supports hostname i am connecting.
>
This is simple not possible. TCP doesn't have any signs of the
original domain name that was used for connect(2) on the client side.
--
Maxim Konovalov
___
nginx mailing list
nginx@nginx.org
http://mailman.nginx.org/mailman/listinfo/nginx
cy":"brick dust"},
> {"name":"blue","fancy":"sea spray"}]}';
>>> var my_object = JSON.parse(my_data);
>>> my_object.colors[1].fancy;
> sea spray
>>>
>
>
> I found this in https://ww
pp/conf:4>
>
>
> This is my version:
>
> nginx version: nginx/1.12.2
>
>
> What do I make wrong? Since version 1.9.2 this option should be
> possible.
>
It is a part of paid version. From nginx.org/r/ntlm:
"This directive
us about the progress of releasing the official feature? And is
> it being supported in Nginx Plus?
>
have you tested the patch? Any feedback?
Thanks,
Maxim
--
Maxim Konovalov
___
nginx mailing list
nginx@nginx.org
http://mailman.nginx.org/mailman/listinfo/nginx
On 15/02/2018 14:50, Akhil Dangore wrote:
> Hello Team,
>
> Is there any to distinguish between nginx and nginx plus except
> "version check"(nginx -v) ?
>
Yes, there is. This is -plus:
$ nginx -v
nginx version: nginx/1.13.7 (nginx-*plus*-r14
1 - 100 of 300 matches
Mail list logo
