Re: [PATCH] Allow using nodelay=N semantics in limit_req configuration

2018-10-31 Thread Щучкин Петр
Hello, Maxim! It takes me some time to express new parameter with words, but finally it is as simple as "start to delay after N requests". I agree it more suitable then nodelay= and there is no need to warn about delay>burst. Thank you, I'll be very happy to see this feature in upstream. PS There

Re: [PATCH] Allow using nodelay=N semantics in limit_req configuration

2018-10-29 Thread Maxim Dounin
Hello! On Sun, Oct 28, 2018 at 05:58:45PM +0300, Peter Shchuchkin wrote: > # HG changeset patch > # User Peter Shchuchkin > # Date 1540737213 -10800 > # Sun Oct 28 17:33:33 2018 +0300 > # Node ID 70c0d476999d9b893c644606624134248ac7abad > # Parent 874d47ac871a4b62fbe0ff5d469a8ad7bc5a4160

Re: [PATCH] Allow using nodelay=N semantics in limit_req configuration

2018-10-28 Thread Щучкин Петр
Hello! Sorry, I've duplicated this message. Additionally I've tried to send with hg email changes to nginx-test in the same thread, but I'm not sure I've succeed and instead new thread was created with changes in tests project. Please review this changes, I hope this may be really useful for

[PATCH] Allow using nodelay=N semantics in limit_req configuration

2018-10-28 Thread Peter Shchuchkin
# HG changeset patch # User Peter Shchuchkin # Date 1540737213 -10800 # Sun Oct 28 17:33:33 2018 +0300 # Node ID 70c0d476999d9b893c644606624134248ac7abad # Parent 874d47ac871a4b62fbe0ff5d469a8ad7bc5a4160 Allow using nodelay=N semantics in limit_req configuration This allows to use

[PATCH] Allow using nodelay=N semantics in limit_req configuration

2018-10-28 Thread Peter Shchuchkin
# HG changeset patch # User Peter Shchuchkin # Date 1540737213 -10800 # Sun Oct 28 17:33:33 2018 +0300 # Node ID 70c0d476999d9b893c644606624134248ac7abad # Parent 874d47ac871a4b62fbe0ff5d469a8ad7bc5a4160 Allow using nodelay=N semantics in limit_req configuration This allows to use