Re: [ngram] Fwd: -1.1000(sic!) as result from rank.pl

2013-02-09 Thread Ted Pedersen
t; So, I don't think it is due to that the sets are too different, but >>> something that is beyond me. That's why I though it was important to report >>> it to you. >>> >>> /karin >>> >>> Karin Cavallin >>> PhD Student in Compu

Re: [ngram] Fwd: -1.1000(sic!) as result from rank.pl

2013-02-09 Thread Ted Pedersen
urg, Sweden >> >> -- >> *Från:* duluth...@gmail.com [duluth...@gmail.com] för Ted Pedersen [ >> tpede...@d.umn.edu] >> *Skickat:* den 6 februari 2013 03:35 >> *Till:* ngram@yahoogroups.com >> *Cc:* Karin Cavallin >> *Ämn

Re: [ngram] Fwd: -1.1000(sic!) as result from rank.pl

2013-02-06 Thread Ted Pedersen
ruari 2013 03:35 > *Till:* ngram@yahoogroups.com > *Cc:* Karin Cavallin > *Ämne:* Re: [ngram] Fwd: -1.1000(sic!) as result from rank.pl [1 > Attachment] > > Hi Karin, > > I think the problem you are having is due to the fact that you have > different number of word

Re: [ngram] Fwd: -1.1000(sic!) as result from rank.pl

2013-02-05 Thread Ted Pedersen
Hi Karin, I think the problem you are having is due to the fact that you have different number of word pairs in each list, and the fact that most of the word pairs are unique to each list. In general rank.pl expects that the two input files be made up of the same pairs of words (just ranked differ

[ngram] Fwd: -1.1000(sic!) as result from rank.pl [1 Attachment]

2013-02-05 Thread Ted Pedersen
-- Forwarded message -- From: Karin Cavallin Date: Tue, Feb 5, 2013 at 8:53 AM Subject: -1.1000(sic!) as result from rank.pl To: "tpede...@umn.edu" Dear professor Ted I didn't know whom to report this error to, so I hope you can forward this to the appropriate receiver. I have