I thought this is not necessarily an NHibernate problem, but related
to this issue.
In WPF or Silverlight, we need to implement those interfaces, this
dynamic proxy generation works great and we have the right hooks in
NHibernate to do it, but Do you know how to do something similar if we
need
OK, i wrote it a little confusing. Sorry.
If I set a null value to a property with NHV not-null constraint, and
try to save the object, a PropertyValueException[not-null property
references a null or transient value] is thrown instead of
InvalidStateException.
On Oct 15, 12:42 pm, Fabio Maulo
You should use WCF extensions point in that secenario rather than Nhibernate
extensions point.
You could use dynamicproxy in the desserialization proccess.
Have a look to IDataContractSurrogate. GetDesearilizedObject method.
BTW, Castle DP is compatible with silverlight
2009/10/19 Miguel
Too much Invarsion
I am a real newbee to this,,, but eager to learn. Can you explain
more??
On 18 Okt, 22:11, Fabio Maulo fabioma...@gmail.com wrote:
Too much invasion.
2009/10/18 LasseL lg.lindst...@gmail.com
Another thing raised to my mind.. regarding configuration of
Not sure if this is the recommended way, but I set autoflush to never
and manually call both flush and commit (though I have my base
repository commit call flush automatically) that way I know exactly
when these things happen. After reading ayende's article I realized
that is how I have been
Thanks for the reply,
Your advise is appreciated and i'm going to agree with you. My
question now is what stratagy would you recomend for DTO that
minimizes coding and can make use of existing entities, but not break
sepration? I'm really trying to organize, simplify, and standardize my
projects
You are integrating NHV with NH and in the Save/Update NH is working before
NHV.
2009/10/19 Fernando Sosa Balaguer fernandososa...@gmail.com
OK, i wrote it a little confusing. Sorry.
If I set a null value to a property with NHV not-null constraint, and
try to save the object, a
The rule for a good framework is : DON'T TOUCH MY CODE!!!The framework
should work without need to change your existing code.
2009/10/19 LasseL lg.lindst...@gmail.com
Too much Invarsion
I am a real newbee to this,,, but eager to learn. Can you explain
more??
On 18 Okt, 22:11, Fabio Maulo
What about this?
http://ayende.com/Blog/archive/2007/12/05/Object--Object-mapping.aspx
On Oct 19, 8:57 am, YankeeImperialistDog webbuilder...@gmail.com
wrote:
Thanks for the reply,
Your advise is appreciated and i'm going to agree with you. My
question now is what stratagy would you
I don't know that, because I even don't know why do you need a DTO.
DTO is the acronym of Data Transfer Object, should be simple, you don't
want to transfer something whit nhibernate inside.
Try in your service; or if you will use NHibernate to fill the DTO, in your
DAL.
Sompeople use AutoMapper
I have been pondering over this problem for quite a while and have not
come up with a satisfactory solution yet. Assume you have two ARs,
customer and order. I don't want the order to be part of the
customer AR, because I don't think that two users working on orders
simultaneously should engage
uh! sorry, I have some misspelled words!
with, some people
2009/10/19 José F. Romaniello joseromanie...@gmail.com
I don't know that, because I even don't know why do you need a DTO.
DTO is the acronym of Data Transfer Object, should be simple, you don't
want to transfer something whit
This is showing my lack of experience here: I am trying to do exactly that,
but don't know which tools or where the DTO's should live.
given this Ayende snipit:
public class OrderToOrderDTO
{
public delegate void Transformer(Order o, OrderDTO d);
ListTransformer transforms = new
That's ok, i forgot to add information. my question continued: my
first reaction is to create a new project specificly for DTO, but
complication is what i'm trying to avoid, so i think it would be
better to make it part of the Services project that handles commands.
My interfaces are there
The DTOs should live in the same project that defines your service
interfaces. The interfaces are the operations your service consumers
can request, and the DTOs are the messages passed into and out of
those service methods.
The Object - DTO transformers (aka mappers, aka assemblers) should
live
thanks you both for the help. Appreciated!
On Oct 19, 10:47 am, Chris Geihsler see...@gmail.com wrote:
The DTOs should live in the same project that defines your service
interfaces. The interfaces are the operations your service consumers
can request, and the DTOs are the messages passed into
i'm really going overbord with DTO's in my quest for the correct
way.
what do some of you consider correct for property naming?
given a Customer and CustomerDTO (class)
each with an id and a string for a Name property
Customer.ID
Customer.Name
what would the CustomerDTO properties be?
Hi,
If somebody is interested. I moved to Dynamic Proxy 2 and the problem
disappeared.
Apparently it is a bug in Castle Dynamic Proxy 1.
On Fri, Oct 16, 2009 at 10:26 AM, Humberto Marchezi hcmarch...@gmail.comwrote:
Hi,
I use Castle Dynamic Proxy to insert aspects in the system we are doing
Francisco,
Sorry for such a late reply, it was a busy time recently.
I have tried your suggestion and it did not help. I have completely
disabled Castle Logging Facility and even removed log4net config file.
Still, I get the alert in NHibernate Profiler.
I see that Jan involved Ayende in the
Hi Mathieu,
For a simple case like that, your class bridge should work like that (from
memory):
[Indexed]
[ClassBridge(typeof(ClassBridge))]
public class Entity
{
public string Foo{get;set;}
public string Bar{get;set;}
}
public class ClassBridge:IFieldBridge
{
I have the following model:
user belongs to an account M:1
account has an owner 1:1
account has many users 1:M
the owner of an account is also belongs to that account.
mapped with FNH
mapping.References( user = user.Account )
.Column( AccountId )
.Cascade.All();
( where mapping is
Comparing NHibernate's LINQ provider to the only other ORM I have
tried, which is LightSpeed, the performance of queries for NHIbernate
is horrible. It is at least 2 to 5 times slower for fairly basic
queries.
You guys really should focus on LINQ. Most people don't want to use
the Criteria api
I need to write mapping file for below classes. Problem is, I have no
table in database for Branch, just need an ıd for MAINBRANCHCODE
field. My mappin document is as below. Error is Could not find a
getter for property 'Information.MainBranch.Id' in class
'PromissoryNotes.Server.Data.Bundle'
I have a hierarchy of classes where Company and Person inherit from
the class Contact. Each of the 3 classes has a separate underlying
database table. The base Contact class has a boolean property
IsActive.
I created a simple filter with the condition Active = 1. The problem
is if I apply the
I am at a stage in my project where I cannot chnge to another ORM. My
application looks like :
1) Windows Forms - Presentation Layer
2) BusinessObjects-Entities/Custom,Generic-
BindableAndFilterableCollections/EntityMappings -Serializable objects
3) Server - DataRepository/UserAuthentication etc
=
I have table mytable where value of column myValue is null.
I have application where NHibernate calls Sybase Stored procedure.
In procedure,I have Case Statement where I check for null for a value.
Select Case myValue
when null then
0
I have the exact same problem with filters.
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
nhusers group.
To post to this group, send email to nhusers@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
I'm running into the same problem. When I strip down my code and only
insert into one table (mapped type), the batching works correctly.
Once I try to batch across a number of types, the statements no longer
are batched.
Is this by design? if it's just grouping sql statements together,
http://lkml.org/lkml/2000/8/25/132
Tuna Toksöz
Eternal sunshine of the open source mind.
http://devlicio.us/blogs/tuna_toksoz
http://tunatoksoz.com
http://twitter.com/tehlike
On Tue, Oct 20, 2009 at 1:30 AM, aemami aemam...@gmail.com wrote:
Comparing NHibernate's LINQ provider to the only
The batch is per persister.If you want you can try a different behaviour but
take care... don't feel so happy at the first success, try it in some
complex scenario saving objects graph with
different association/aggregation.
2009/10/19 fknebels fkneb...@gmail.com
I'm running into the same
Most Urgent Issue!!!
2009/10/19 SGK himanshukodw...@gmail.com
I am at a stage in my project where I cannot chnge to another ORM. My
application looks like :
1) Windows Forms - Presentation Layer
2) BusinessObjects-Entities/Custom,Generic-
BindableAndFilterableCollections/EntityMappings
Something that doesn't take care of such things doesn't deserve to be
called architecture.
You have a jenga/yenga architecture, so you will not get a
simpler/pluggable/[put pretty words here] solution.
http://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jenga
http://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/JengaI don't know if this game
Due to the nature of your request and the timeframes within which you
appear to need said request satisfied, I think commercial NHibernate
support is probably your best option for getting this resolved. I
believe both Ayende and Fabio Maulo provide commercial consulting for
NHibernate problems
Ok thanks, my bigger problem is here:
http://groups.google.com/group/nhusers/browse_thread/thread/64d608afc2cd01c3
On Oct 19, 4:23 pm, Fabio Maulo fabioma...@gmail.com wrote:
your are calling Flush
2009/10/18 acl123 andrewclawre...@gmail.com
The following code demonstrates a misleading
By the way I am using Session-Per-Web-Request as this appears to be
the recommend way to use NHibernate with Asp .NET.
This means that I definitely don't want to be wrapping the entire
session in a transaction (the method that Ayende uses on his blog). I
want to be using TransactionScope
like
Take a look at this: http://nhforge.org/doc/nh/en/index.html#components
On Mon, Oct 19, 2009 at 9:01 AM, alish alikemalhas...@gmail.com wrote:
I need to write mapping file for below classes. Problem is, I have no
table in database for Branch, just need an ıd for MAINBRANCHCODE
field. My
Tuna - to be perfectly honest, that was a bullshit response on your part. I
really do not think ANYONE thinks the performance of NHibernate.Linq is on
par with L2S.
Not only that but using Nh.Linq is painful at best when it cannot do quite a
few things that L2S or L2O can do. Doing almost anything
I tend to agree with you Alec. The current Nh.Linq is rubbish. I still
use it for very basic queries, ie select name from customer where
customerid = 1, but any more and it is very close to useless. I really
really hope the new Linq provider Steve Strong is developing is close
to what L2S offers.
I'll defend the response of Tuna. Yes, I agree, the implementation of linq
is very immature compared to other frameworks. But, I think the first mail
is very immature too, because he is comparing performance without showing
the code... so the best answer is show me the code.
He doesn't say that
Personally I don't know what you are talking about.You can have x
transactions inside the same nh-session.
session-per-request is a pattern well documented and with thousands of
examples.
In your code the first transaction is rolled-back because the transaction is
disposed without commit that
What could go wrong that would cause NHibernate to not know the
persister for intrinsic types like Int64?
exception: No persister for: System.Int64
IListDeposit list = new ListDeposit();
list.Add(new Deposit());
foreach (Deposit o in list)
Are you joking ? Session.Save(Session.Save(o)); // throws exception
what you are expecting from that sentence ?
2009/10/19 Scott White scott.w.wh...@gmail.com
What could go wrong that would cause NHibernate to not know the
persister for intrinsic types like Int64?
exception: No persister
I know, i couldn't resist though :)
Tuna Toksöz
Eternal sunshine of the open source mind.
http://devlicio.us/blogs/tuna_toksoz
http://tunatoksoz.com
http://twitter.com/tehlike
On Tue, Oct 20, 2009 at 4:47 AM, Alec Whittington
alec.whitting...@gmail.com wrote:
Tuna - to be perfectly
Btw, Alec,
This message was his/her first message in the group, and it was just a
complaint without any offer to help, just complaints.
By show me the code, I meant, any help is appreciated. The way that I do
is might be rude, i admit, but sorry, this group is not for complaining but
for sharing.
44 matches
Mail list logo
