Hi,
I've written some code to use Unity as a DI container inside
NHibernate and all seemed to be well.
Today I tried to change a one-to-many mapping to a composite-element
inside a bag and I now get an exception in
NHibernate.Tuple.PocoInstantiator.Instantiate stating that the entity
has no
I haven't shared it yet, but it is based on bits and pieces of code
blog posts that I've put together.
Where and or how can I share?
On Aug 24, 8:05 am, Fabio Maulo fabioma...@gmail.com wrote:
where you have shared your code about the reflection optimizer using Unity ?
2009/8/23 Dawid dmost
Hi,
I'm trying out the new Linq provider, and everything is going well
except when I'm using classes that is mapped as IUserType.
My queries work when using criteria, but fails under linq with Could
not determine a type for class:
OldMutual.SalesGear.Domain.Work.WorkItems.Info.Category,
(Net4CollectionTypeFactory).AssemblyQualifiedName))
.BuildSessionFactory()
Any idea what might be causing this?
Best regards,
Dawid Ciecierski
On Wednesday, May 11, 2011 10:30:25 PM UTC+2, Ted P wrote:
José your code is working just fine.
I wasn't doing my ConfOrm:ing properly. :)
Thanks
()?
Has anyone used Net4Collections with Fluent and can confirm that it works?
Regards,
Dawid
On Thursday, July 12, 2012 6:13:32 PM UTC+2, SexualChocolate wrote:
I'm not sure what you're doing specifically in here:
.Mappings(m = m.FluentMappings.AddFromAssemblyOf
to document that for posterity.
Regards,
Dawid
On Thursday, July 12, 2012 6:13:32 PM UTC+2, SexualChocolate wrote:
I'm not sure what you're doing specifically in here:
.Mappings(m = m.FluentMappings.AddFromAssemblyOf
NhibernateDatabaseConfiguration());
I suspect that fluent isn't recognizing
, Dawid Ciecierski
dawid.ciecier...@gmail.com wrote:
As a side note, it seems that this has been
discussedhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/fluent-nhibernate/QM-X6_59rGg/discussionon
Fluent NHibernate group back in 2011... should have looked more closely.
Will try to see what solutions
polymorphism? If it
is the latter, how do I do that with Loquacious?
Kind regards,
Dawid Ciecierski
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
nhusers group.
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/nhusers/-/myDnPNC1ygkJ.
To post
Hello again,
We're closer to product completion, and are coming across this issue again.
Would love to know if the above is by design, and how we may be able to
overcome the problem with ComposedId made up of superclass properties.
Will be grateful for any advice at all.
Regards,
Dawid
are mapped properly.
Thank you again for your help!
Dawid Ciecierski
On Wednesday, October 31, 2012 3:53:45 PM UTC+1, aje...@gmail.com wrote:
Dawid,
It sounds like a bug to me too, which actually would not be terribly
surprising. In general, I've found that features that stray from
to be pulled that way, but there it is just in case
it makes someone's life easier.
Best regards,
Dawid
On Monday, November 5, 2012 4:05:45 PM UTC+1, aje...@gmail.com wrote:
Dawid,
That's great that you were able to figure it out, and thank you for
getting back to the group with your find
management methods, but fails when a simple DELETE is issued against
the database.
Dawid
On Thursday, May 15, 2014 12:58:12 PM UTC+2, Ricardo Peres wrote:
I have a similar mapping - Post and Tag - where one Post can have several
tags, which are just strings (sorry, don't have time to change
but not
too sure where and what to look for.
(Would I be correct to say that a LINQ query is later translated into HQL,
and therefore it would be best to transform the HQL rather than just the
LINQ expression to have maximum coverage — both LINQ and HQL queries?)
Regards,
Dawid Ciecierski
--
You
case, perhaps there is a way to force the same behaviour in an even
more (IMHO) straight-forward instance.
Dawid
On Thursday, May 15, 2014 6:27:28 PM UTC+2, Ricardo Peres wrote:
Meaning: if you want to have cascade actions on the database, you have to
add them yourself, maybe using auxiliary
.
Dawid
On Thursday, May 15, 2014 7:10:25 PM UTC+2, Ricardo Peres wrote:
There's the FetchMode, for which you can specify CollectionFetchMode.Join.
RP
On Thursday, May 15, 2014 5:31:56 PM UTC+1, Dawid Ciecierski wrote:
Hello,
I'm wondering if there is an extensibility point in NHibernate
Meant to link to Stack Overflow but forgot: here is the question and
explanationhttp://stackoverflow.com/questions/4468571/nhibernate-mapping-not-adding-on-delete-cascade-option-to-foreign-key-referenceI
wanted to mention.
On Thursday, May 15, 2014 6:38:48 PM UTC+2, Dawid Ciecierski wrote
, and their execution results in exceptions.
If I can confirm this with more poking around, I'll try to come up with
unit tests that demontrate the above later today and raise an issue on JIRA
in hopes of having this resolved before 4.0 RTMs.
Dawid
On Thursday, May 15, 2014 10:50:48 PM UTC+2, Dawid
explicitly fetch the items/collections you
want.
RP
On Friday, May 16, 2014 11:25:12 AM UTC+1, Dawid Ciecierski wrote:
Funny that — with further testing of the different querying strategies I
came across some pretty strange behaviour: configured collection fetch
strategies honoured only in some
help in fixing this.
On Friday, May 16, 2014 1:00:14 PM UTC+2, Dawid Ciecierski wrote:
If this is the case, then why do they attempt to honour
CollectionFetchMode.Subselect? The HQL and LINQ providers not honouring
some of the mappings behaviour does not seem to be mentioned
. Hence
hoping that NH masters will have more ideas as to why this is happening!
Will be grateful for any and all input that brings us a little closer to a
solution.
(Class definitions and mappings can be found on StackOverflow.)
Regards,
Dawid Ciecierski
--
You received this message because you
Anyone? :-) Still having this problem and not sure how to proceed. Will be
grateful for any and all ideas!
Regards,
Dawid
On Thursday, September 11, 2014 6:30:30 AM UTC+2, Dawid Ciecierski wrote:
This is a cross-post from StackOverflow, but doing it only because the
original question did
elements would fall under collection elements (step 4), while child
entities should be serviced by step 3 + step 5.
Regards,
Dawid
On Wednesday, January 7, 2015 2:20:54 PM UTC+1, Oskar Berggren wrote:
Are you calling Save() or similar on the new Profile?
Otherwise, it might be that Profile
time later today to test this on good old Sessions and perhaps come
back with a sample solution if NH still does not behave correctly.
Regards,
Dawid
On Wednesday, January 7, 2015 6:38:17 PM UTC+1, Ricardo Peres wrote:
TransactionScope has some (OK, a lot of) problems with NHibernate
23 matches
Mail list logo
